Literature DB >> 21430572

Lower incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion found with those fusing C5-6 and C6-7 than those leaving C5-6 or C6-7 as an adjacent level.

Shingo Komura1, Kei Miyamoto, Hideo Hosoe, Nobuki Iinuma, Katsuji Shimizu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of adjacent disc degeneration (ADD) after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ADF).
OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the influence of the number of levels fused in ADF on the incidence of ADD. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ADD is known as a complication associated with ADF. However, how the number of levels fused affects the incidence of ADD is not well understood.
METHODS: One hundred and two patients with cervical degenerative disease, who underwent ADF and were followed for more than 24 months, were retrospectively analyzed. They were classified into 2 groups, a long group (L group) consisting of 50 cases with ADF of 4 or more disc levels, and a short group (S group) consisting of 52 cases with ADF of 3 or fewer disc levels. Furthermore, the patients were also divided into 2 groups according to inclusion or exclusion of C5-6 and C6-7 (C group: including both, NC group: not including both). The incidence of ADD, and that of symptomatic ADD (sADD), was compared between the 2 classifications.
RESULTS: In the L group, there were 13 cases of ADD (26.0%), including 1 case of sADD (2.0%), whereas in the S group, there were 22 cases of ADD (42.3%), including 11 cases of sADD (21.2%). The incidence of sADD was significantly lesser in the L group (P=0.024). Three cases with sADD in the S group required revision surgery, whereas no additional surgery related to ADD was performed on patients in the L group. In addition, in the C group, ADD occurred in 20 of 71 cases (28.2%) and sADD occurred in 4 of 71 cases (5.6%), whereas in the NC group, ADD occurred in 15 of 31 cases (48.4%) and sADD occurred in 8 of 31 cases (25.8%). The incidence of ADD and sADD were significantly lesser in the C group (P=0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: ADD occurs less frequently among patients in whom C5-6 and C6-7 are fused than among those in whom C5-6 or C6-7 is left at an adjacent level, irrespective of the length of the fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21430572     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31820bb1f8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  12 in total

1.  Adjacent Segment Pathology After Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Part 2: Clinical Results at 7-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Pierce D Nunley; Eubulus J Kerr; David A Cavanaugh; Phillip Andrew Utter; Peter G Campbell; Rishi Wadhwa; Kelly A Frank; Kyle E Marshall; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

2.  Artificial intelligence in predicting early-onset adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Samuel S Rudisill; Alexander L Hornung; J Nicolás Barajas; Jack J Bridge; G Michael Mallow; Wylie Lopez; Arash J Sayari; Philip K Louie; Garrett K Harada; Youping Tao; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Matthew W Colman; Frank M Phillips; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 3.  Strategies to Achieve Spinal Fusion in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: An Overview.

Authors:  Michael H McCarthy; Joseph A Weiner; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-12-09

Review 4.  Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingde Kong; Junming Cao; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Multilevel cervical disc replacement versus multilevel anterior discectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ting-Kui Wu; Bei-Yu Wang; Yang Meng; Chen Ding; Yi Yang; Ji-Gang Lou; Hao Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Different surgical approaches for the treatment of adjacent segment diseases after anterior cervical fusion: A retrospective study of 49 patients.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Peng Wang; De-Chao Miao; Wei Du; Yong Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Correlation of neural foraminal motion after surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy with long-term patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Timothy Baumer; Daniel Oravec; Azam Basheer; Michael J Bey; Stephen W Bartol; Victor Chang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-03

Review 8.  Operative outcomes for cervical degenerative disease: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kazuya Nishizawa; Kanji Mori; Yasuo Saruhashi; Yoshitaka Matsusue
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2012-01-16

Review 9.  Adjacent Segment Pathology after Anterior Cervical Fusion.

Authors:  Jae Yoon Chung; Jong-Beom Park; Hyoung-Yeon Seo; Sung Kyu Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-06-16

10.  In-Depth Analysis on Influencing Factors of Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Cervical Fusion.

Authors:  Chaojie Yu; Xiaoping Mu; Jianxun Wei; Ye Chu; Bin Liang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.