Literature DB >> 21425804

Molecular-level origins of biomass recalcitrance: decrystallization free energies for four common cellulose polymorphs.

Gregg T Beckham1, James F Matthews, Baron Peters, Yannick J Bomble, Michael E Himmel, Michael F Crowley.   

Abstract

Cellulose is a crystalline polymer of β1,4-D-glucose that is difficult to deconstruct to sugars by enzymes. The recalcitrance of cellulose microfibrils is a function of both the shape of cellulose microfibrils and the intrinsic work required to decrystallize individual chains, the latter of which is calculated here from the surfaces of four crystalline cellulose polymorphs: cellulose Iβ, cellulose Iα, cellulose II, and cellulose III(I). For edge chains, the order of decrystallization work is as follows (from highest to lowest): Iβ, Iα, ΙΙΙ(Ι), and II. For cellulose Iβ, we compare chains from three different locations on the surface and find that an increasing number of intralayer hydrogen bonds (from 0 to 2) increases the intrinsic decrystallization work. From these results, we propose a microkinetic model for the deconstruction of cellulose (and chitin) by processive enzymes, which when taken with a previous study [Horn et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 18089] identifies the thermodynamic and kinetic attributes of enzyme and substrate engineering for enhanced cellulose (or chitin) conversion. Overall, this study provides new insights into the molecular interactions that form the structural basis of cellulose, which is the primary building block of plant cell walls, and highlights the need for experimentally determining microfibril shape at the nanometer length scale when comparing conversion rates of cellulose polymorphs by enzymes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21425804     DOI: 10.1021/jp1106394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  45 in total

1.  Pre-steady-state kinetics for hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose by cellobiohydrolase Cel7A.

Authors:  Nicolaj Cruys-Bagger; Jens Elmerdahl; Eigil Praestgaard; Hirosuke Tatsumi; Nikolaj Spodsberg; Kim Borch; Peter Westh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Product binding varies dramatically between processive and nonprocessive cellulase enzymes.

Authors:  Lintao Bu; Mark R Nimlos; Michael R Shirts; Jerry Ståhlberg; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Glycosylated linkers in multimodular lignocellulose-degrading enzymes dynamically bind to cellulose.

Authors:  Christina M Payne; Michael G Resch; Liqun Chen; Michael F Crowley; Michael E Himmel; Larry E Taylor; Mats Sandgren; Jerry Ståhlberg; Ingeborg Stals; Zhongping Tan; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Increased enzyme binding to substrate is not necessary for more efficient cellulose hydrolysis.

Authors:  Dahai Gao; Shishir P S Chundawat; Anurag Sethi; Venkatesh Balan; S Gnanakaran; Bruce E Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Initial recognition of a cellodextrin chain in the cellulose-binding tunnel may affect cellobiohydrolase directional specificity.

Authors:  Pavan K Ghattyvenkatakrishna; Emal M Alekozai; Gregg T Beckham; Roland Schulz; Michael F Crowley; Edward C Uberbacher; Xiaolin Cheng
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Single-molecule imaging analysis of elementary reaction steps of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) hydrolyzing crystalline cellulose Iα and IIII.

Authors:  Yusuke Shibafuji; Akihiko Nakamura; Takayuki Uchihashi; Naohisa Sugimoto; Shingo Fukuda; Hiroki Watanabe; Masahiro Samejima; Toshio Ando; Hiroyuki Noji; Anu Koivula; Kiyohiko Igarashi; Ryota Iino
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Kinetics of cellobiohydrolase (Cel7A) variants with lowered substrate affinity.

Authors:  Jeppe Kari; Johan Olsen; Kim Borch; Nicolaj Cruys-Bagger; Kenneth Jensen; Peter Westh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Multiple functions of aromatic-carbohydrate interactions in a processive cellulase examined with molecular simulation.

Authors:  Christina M Payne; Yannick J Bomble; Courtney B Taylor; Clare McCabe; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Crystal structure and computational characterization of the lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase GH61D from the Basidiomycota fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium.

Authors:  Miao Wu; Gregg T Beckham; Anna M Larsson; Takuya Ishida; Seonah Kim; Christina M Payne; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley; Svein J Horn; Bjørge Westereng; Kiyohiko Igarashi; Masahiro Samejima; Jerry Ståhlberg; Vincent G H Eijsink; Mats Sandgren
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Single-molecule Imaging Analysis of Binding, Processive Movement, and Dissociation of Cellobiohydrolase Trichoderma reesei Cel6A and Its Domains on Crystalline Cellulose.

Authors:  Akihiko Nakamura; Tomoyuki Tasaki; Daiki Ishiwata; Mayuko Yamamoto; Yasuko Okuni; Akasit Visootsat; Morice Maximilien; Hiroyuki Noji; Taku Uchiyama; Masahiro Samejima; Kiyohiko Igarashi; Ryota Iino
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.