Literature DB >> 21425386

Screening for distress and supportive care needs during the initial phase of the care process: a qualitative description of a clinical pilot experiment in a French cancer center.

Sylvie Dolbeault1, Béatrice Boistard, Jocelyne Meuric, Laure Copel, Anne Brédart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a qualitative description of a clinical pilot experiment in a French cancer center, conducted by a nurse after the treatment decision consultation attended by new cancer patients during the initial phase of the care process.
METHODS: The Psychological Distress Thermometer (PDS) and a problem checklist were administered to 255 patients before nurse consultation, helping her to manage the clinical interview, explore patient's distress and supportive care needs, and finally refer the patients in need to the required Supportive Care units.
RESULTS: Patients were primarily referred to the social service unit (35% patients), followed by the physiotherapy unit (23.9%) and the psycho-oncology unit (19.6% of patients). In cases of significant distress (43% patients with PDS>3), the percentage of patients referred to the psychosocial units increased (44% referred to the Social Unit, 35% to the Psycho-Oncology Unit). However, the main interest of our screening procedure resides in its qualitative and didactic dimension, based on clinical training and cooperation with healthcare professionals during the process of investigating patients' distress and their supportive care needs. Difficulties and limitations are also described.
CONCLUSIONS: This first clinical experiment conducted among dedicated nurses involved in a Therapeutic Decision Consultation in a French cancer center has provided evidence in support of the idea that non-specialist professionals are able to identify patients' distress and their Supportive Care needs (particularly in the psychosocial field) provided that they have received appropriate training.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21425386     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  5 in total

1.  Removing the stress from selecting instruments: arming social workers to take leadership in routine distress screening implementation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rohan
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2012

2.  Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Michelle B Riba; Kristine A Donovan; Barbara Andersen; IIana Braun; William S Breitbart; Benjamin W Brewer; Luke O Buchmann; Matthew M Clark; Molly Collins; Cheyenne Corbett; Stewart Fleishman; Sofia Garcia; Donna B Greenberg; Rev George F Handzo; Laura Hoofring; Chao-Hui Huang; Robin Lally; Sara Martin; Lisa McGuffey; William Mitchell; Laura J Morrison; Megan Pailler; Oxana Palesh; Francine Parnes; Janice P Pazar; Laurel Ralston; Jaroslava Salman; Moreen M Shannon-Dudley; Alan D Valentine; Nicole R McMillian; Susan D Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Evaluation of Distress and Stress in Cancer Patients in AMIR Oncology Hospital in Shiraz.

Authors:  A Mansourabadi; M Moogooei; S Nozari
Journal:  Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

4.  Understanding why cancer patients accept or turn down psycho-oncological support: a prospective observational study including patients' and clinicians' perspectives on communication about distress.

Authors:  Diana Zwahlen; Theresa Tondorf; Sacha Rothschild; Michael T Koller; Christoph Rochlitz; Alexander Kiss
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Perceived utility of an integrated psychological intervention for gynaecological cancer patients admitted for surgery: preliminary data.

Authors:  Paola Arnaboldi; Serena Oliveri; Valeria Vadilonga; Luigi Santoro; Angelo Maggioni; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2017-02-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.