Literature DB >> 21425041

Image Registered Gastroscopic Ultrasound (IRGUS) in human subjects: a pilot study to assess feasibility.

K L Obstein1, R S Estépar, J Jayender, V D Patil, I S Spofford, M B Ryan, B I Lengyel, R Shams, K G Vosburgh, C C Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a complex procedure due to the subtleties of ultrasound interpretation, the small field of observation, and the uncertainty of probe position and orientation. Animal studies demonstrated that Image Registered Gastroscopic Ultrasound (IRGUS) is feasible and may be superior to conventional EUS in efficiency and image interpretation. This study explores whether these attributes of IRGUS will be evident in human subjects, with the aim of assessing the feasibility, effectiveness, and efficiency of IRGUS in patients with suspected pancreatic lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective feasibility study at a tertiary care academic medical center in human patients with pancreatic lesions on computed tomography (CT) scan. Patients who were scheduled to undergo conventional EUS were randomly chosen to undergo their procedure with IRGUS. Main outcome measures included feasibility, ease of use, system function, validated task load (TLX) assessment instrument, and IRGUS experience questionnaire.
RESULTS: Five patients underwent IRGUS without complication. Localization of pancreatic lesions was accomplished efficiently and accurately (TLX temporal demand 3.7 %; TLX effort 8.6 %). Image synchronization and registration was accomplished in real time without procedure delay. The mean assessment score for endoscopist experience with IRGUS was positive (66.6 ± 29.4). Real-time display of CT images in the EUS plane and echoendoscope orientation were the most beneficial characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: IRGUS appears feasible and safe in human subjects, and efficient and accurate at identification of probe position and image interpretation. IRGUS has the potential to broaden the adoption of EUS techniques and shorten EUS learning curves. Clinical studies comparing IRGUS with conventional EUS are ongoing. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21425041      PMCID: PMC4054821          DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  23 in total

1.  The concept of image-guided therapy.

Authors:  Kirby G Vosburgh; Ferenc A Jolesz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: the clinical impact.

Authors:  William R Brugge
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Electromagnetic navigation during flexible bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Yehuda Schwarz; Atul C Mehta; Armin Ernst; Felix Herth; Ahuva Engel; Doron Besser; Heinrich D Becker
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.580

4.  A new visualization technique for laparoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  James Ellsmere; Jeffery Stoll; William Wells; Ron Kikinis; Kirby Vosburgh; Robert Kane; David Brooks; David Rattner
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Mental workload in air traffic control: an index constructed from field tests.

Authors:  Philippe Averty; Christian Collet; André Dittmar; Sylvie Athènes; Evelyne Vernet-Maury
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2004-04

Review 6.  Intraoperative ultrasonography: history, current state of the art, and future directions.

Authors:  Robert A Kane
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic tumor diagnosis.

Authors:  T Rösch; R Lorenz; C Braig; S Feuerbach; J R Siewert; V Schusdziarra; M Classen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers.

Authors:  S G Shah; B P Saunders; J C Brooker; C B Williams
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on patient tolerance and sedation requirements during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Syed G Shah; Jim C Brooker; Catherine Thapar; Noriko Suzuki; Christopher B Williams; Brian P Saunders
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Hands-free administration of subjective workload scales: acceptability in a surgical training environment.

Authors:  C Melody Carswell; Cindy H Lio; Russell Grant; Martina I Klein; Duncan Clarke; W Brent Seales; Stephen Strup
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.661

View more
  4 in total

1.  Fusion radiology in interventional endoscopy (FRIend): a new approach for pancreatic fluid collections.

Authors:  Romano Sassatelli; Simone Grillo; Marta Ottone; Giulia Besutti; Paolo Cecinato; Giuliana Sereni; Vincenzo Giorgio Mirante; Veronica Iori; Pierpaolo Pattacini; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Real-time computed tomography-based augmented reality for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery navigation.

Authors:  D E Azagury; M Ryou; S N Shaikh; R San José Estépar; B I Lengyel; J Jagadeesan; K G Vosburgh; C C Thompson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Endosonography in solid and cystic pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Somashekar G Krishna; Jeffrey H Lee
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-01

4.  A novel fusion imaging system for endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Lucian Gheorghe Gruionu; Adrian Saftoiu; Gabriel Gruionu
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.