Literature DB >> 2142486

Teicoplanin as modification of initial empirical therapy in febrile granulocytopenic patients.

I R Nováková1, J P Donnelly, C S Verhagen, B E De Pauw.   

Abstract

Teicoplanin at a dose of 400 mg per day was added to the initial empirical therapy of 65 of 202 febrile granulocytopenic episodes. Of 53 cases evaluable for outcome 23 (43%) responded. Responders and nonresponders were comparable in terms of time of starting teicoplanin treatment, duration of therapy and of granulocytopenia, number of granulocytopenic days after therapy was stopped and peak and through concentrations of the drug. Teicoplanin was given most often because of persistent fever or initial Gram-positive bacteraemia and only one-third of these cases responded. However, when teicoplanin was given because of proven or presumed Gram-positive infection 67% of cases were treated successfully. Patients with skin and soft tissue infections achieved a 78% response rate. The development of a lung infiltrate was the most common reason for failure to respond, although in most instances the aetiology was not determined. Serum concentrations of teicoplanin were predictable; peak and trough concentrations on the fourth day were 30.4 +/- 5.0 mg/l and 9.8 +/- 1.7 mg/l, respectively. Concentrations achieved in individual patients did not correspond to outcome. Hearing loss of 20 dB at 800 Hz was noted in one of 15 cases and transient liver or kidney disturbances attributable to the drug were observed in 4% of cases. Teicoplanin therapy was safe but only effective when used to treat infective episodes with a high probability of being due to Gram-positive bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2142486     DOI: 10.1093/jac/25.6.985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  6 in total

Review 1.  Teicoplanin. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of gram-positive infections.

Authors:  C M Spencer; H M Bryson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  A risk-benefit assessment of teicoplanin in the treatment of infections.

Authors:  F de Lalla; A Tramarin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Empirical antibiotics targeting gram-positive bacteria for the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

Authors:  Ofrat Beyar-Katz; Yaakov Dickstein; Sara Borok; Liat Vidal; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-03

4.  Ceftazidime as monotherapy or combined with teicoplanin for initial empiric treatment of presumed bacteremia in febrile granulocytopenic patients.

Authors:  I Nováková; J P Donnelly; B De Pauw
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Double-blind comparison of teicoplanin versus vancomycin in febrile neutropenic patients receiving concomitant tobramycin and piperacillin: effect on cyclosporin A-associated nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  A Kureishi; P J Jewesson; M Rubinger; C D Cole; D E Reece; G L Phillips; J A Smith; A W Chow
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Teicoplanin. A reappraisal of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  R N Brogden; D H Peters
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.