BACKGROUND: Interleukin-8 (IL-8, CXCL8) is readily produced by human malignant cells. Dendritic cells (DC) both produce IL-8 and express the IL-8 functional receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2. Most human colon carcinomas produce IL-8. IL-8 importance in malignancies has been ascribed to angiogenesis promotion. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: IL-8 effects on human monocyte-derived DC biology were explored upon DC exposure to recombinant IL-8 and with the help of an IL-8 neutralizing mAb. In vivo experiments were performed in immunodeficient mice xenografted with IL-8-producing human colon carcinomas and comparatively with cell lines that do not produce IL-8. Allogenic T lymphocyte stimulation by DC was explored under the influence of IL-8. DC and neutrophil chemotaxis were measured by transwell-migration assays. Sera from tumor-xenografted mice contained increasing concentrations of IL-8 as the tumors progress. IL-8 production by carcinoma cells can be modulated by low doses of cyclophosphamide at the transcription level. If human DC are injected into HT29 or CaCo2 xenografted tumors, DC are retained intratumorally in an IL-8-dependent fashion. However, IL-8 did not modify the ability of DC to stimulate T cells. Interestingly, pre-exposure of DC to IL-8 desensitizes such cells for IL-8-mediated in vitro or in vivo chemoattraction. Thereby DC become disoriented to subsequently follow IL-8 chemotactic gradients towards malignant or inflamed tissue. CONCLUSIONS: IL-8 as produced by carcinoma cells changes DC migration cues, without directly interfering with DC-mediated T-cell stimulation.
BACKGROUND:Interleukin-8 (IL-8, CXCL8) is readily produced by human malignant cells. Dendritic cells (DC) both produce IL-8 and express the IL-8 functional receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2. Most humancolon carcinomas produce IL-8. IL-8 importance in malignancies has been ascribed to angiogenesis promotion. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:IL-8 effects on human monocyte-derived DC biology were explored upon DC exposure to recombinant IL-8 and with the help of an IL-8 neutralizing mAb. In vivo experiments were performed in immunodeficientmice xenografted with IL-8-producing humancolon carcinomas and comparatively with cell lines that do not produce IL-8. Allogenic T lymphocyte stimulation by DC was explored under the influence of IL-8. DC and neutrophil chemotaxis were measured by transwell-migration assays. Sera from tumor-xenografted mice contained increasing concentrations of IL-8 as the tumors progress. IL-8 production by carcinoma cells can be modulated by low doses of cyclophosphamide at the transcription level. If human DC are injected into HT29 or CaCo2 xenografted tumors, DC are retained intratumorally in an IL-8-dependent fashion. However, IL-8 did not modify the ability of DC to stimulate T cells. Interestingly, pre-exposure of DC to IL-8 desensitizes such cells for IL-8-mediated in vitro or in vivo chemoattraction. Thereby DC become disoriented to subsequently follow IL-8 chemotactic gradients towards malignant or inflamed tissue. CONCLUSIONS:IL-8 as produced by carcinoma cells changes DC migration cues, without directly interfering with DC-mediated T-cell stimulation.
In a previous study [1] we showed that 111Indium-labeled DC when
injected into tumor lesions of patients suffering advanced digestive carcinomas
[2] tended
to remain inside the injected lesion. An explanation for such a retention was
proposed in the sense that the humantumors abundantly produce IL-8 [1], [3] and DC express
CXCR1 and CXCR2 functional IL-8 receptors on their plasma membrane [1], [4], [5]. However, no
definitive proof was provided for the role of IL-8 in intratumoral retention of DC
[1].An IL-8 homologue is absent from the mouse genome and these precludes incisive
definitive genetic experimentation on the role of IL-8 in murinetumor models.
However there are reports suggesting that mouseCXCR1 is activated by humanIL-8,
hence permitting to some extent experiments in xenografts [6].Chemokine receptors guide DC in physiology and in inflammation [7], [8]. DC migration from
inflamed/infected [9] or malignant tissues [10], [11] is important for the
orchestration of immune responses. Chemokine receptors do not only regulate motility
but also control other cellular functions such as activation or survival in various
cell types [11],
[12].
Therefore it would not be a surprise if the chemokine microenvironment modified DC
functions other than migration [12].Humantumor cells produce IL-8 in most cases [1], [13] as a biological dirty trick
played by the malignant tissue to promote angiogenesis [3], [13], [14], [15] and possibly to support
the type of smoldering inflammation that promotes tumor progression and metastasis
[14], [16], [17]. Tumor growth in
humanpatients statistically correlates with IL-8 serum concentrations [3], [18]. Recently, a role
for IL-8 has been described in the resistance to antiangiogenic VEGF signal blockade
with sunitinib [19]. Importantly escape from sunitinib can be thwarted by
co-treatment with neutralizing anti-IL8 mAb [19].IL-8 was originally discovered as a powerful attractor of polymorphonuclear
leukocytes (PMNs) [20], [21] in acute inflammation [21], but may act on other
leukocyte subtypes [1], [22] and on endothelial cells [15]. In turn, DC are both
responsive to IL-8 [4], [5], and produce IL-8 either when inactive or more overtly so,
when activated/matured [1]. Injecting DC inside tumors has been intended to enhance
antitumor activity for therapeutic purposes in animal models [11], [23] and in the clinic [2], [24], [25]. One of the
hurdles faced is that the tumor microenvironment is rich in substances impairing DC
functions [11],
[26]. DC
migration into lymph nodes is of critical importance in cancer immunotherapy based
on DC [27], [28], [29]. If retained
intratumorally, DC would be prey for tumor microenvironmental factors such as
TGF-β for longer periods of time [11], thereby causing damage to the
induction of anti-tumor immunity.Here we show that xenografts of humantumors retain DC inside the injected tumors by
means of IL-8-mediated chemoattraction, that can also recruit DC to the malignancy
when injected in the subcutaneous connective tissue in the vicinity of the tumor.
However, the same functional recombinant IL-8 that attracts DC and PMNs does not
impair the abilities of DC to induce T-cell activation and proliferation either
in vitro or in vivo. Interestingly,
pre-exposure of DC to IL-8 restrains subsequent migration towards IL-8
chemo-attractive gradients indicating desensitization of the receptors.
Methods
Ethics statement
Animal studies have been performed in accordance with Spanish legislation under
specific approval from the institutional ethics board by the
Comité de Ética para la Experimentación Animal
of the University of Navarra (Study 03/007 approval). Human cells
are obtained from Blood donors (public blood bank of Navarra) under written
informed consent for research.
Dendritic cell generation
Dendritic cells were generated from filter buffy coats (FBC)-derived monocytes
donated by healthy donors [30] who explicitly sign a written informed consent. To
generate immature DCs from monocytes, human peripheral blood was isolated by
Ficoll-Paque gradient centrifugation from FBC. Isolated mononuclear cells from
these sources were subjected to positive selection using anti-CD14-conjugated
paramagnetic beads and purified using the AutoMacs system according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany).
Purified monocytes were cultured for 7 days in RPMI-1640 with 5% (v/v)
heat inactivated FCS. To differentiate dendritic cells from
CD14+ cells, culture medium was supplemented with GM-CSF
(1000 U/mL; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) and IL-4 (500 U/mL; R&D Systems,
Minneapolis, MN). DCs were matured adding clinical grade TNF-α (50 ng/mL;
Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany), IFN-α (1,000 IU/mL;
Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) and Poly I:C (10 µg/mL; Ampligen,
Bioclones, Tokai, South Africa) for 48 h.
Cell lines and IL-8 concentrations in mouse serum and culture
supernatants
HT29, CaCo2 and SW48 colon carcinoma cell lines were obtained from American Type
Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Cell lines were cloned by limiting dilution
in 96-well plates and subcultures (105 cells) were tested for the
concentration of IL-8 in the 24 h supernatants from these subcultures by means
of ELISA (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA). Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) was
purchased in our hospital pharmacy.
Semiquantitative RT-PCR for IL-8
Total cellular RNA was extracted with Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according
to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. First-strand cDNA was synthesized
from 1 µg total cellular RNA using an RNA PCR kit (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu,
Japan) with random primers. Thereafter, cDNA was amplified using 30, and 28
cycles for IL-8 and for β-actin, respectively. The specific primers used
were as follows: IL-8, forward primer 5′-ATGACTTCCAAGCTGGCCGTG -3′ and reverse primer
5′-TTATGAATTCTCAGCCCTCTTCAAAAACTTCTC-3′; and
for β-actin, forward primer 5′-GTGGGGCGCCCCAGGCACCA-3′ and reverse primer
5′-CTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTC-3′. The product
sizes were 300 bp for IL-8, and 548 bp for β-actin. The thermocycling
conditions for the targets were as follows: denaturing at 94°C for 30 s for
IL-8, and β-actin, annealing at 60°C for 30 s for IL-8 and β-actin,
and extension at 72°C for 90 s for IL-8 and β-actin. The PCR products
were fractionated on 2% agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide
staining. The quantity of a band was measured by the area under its intensity
profile curve using BioRad Quantity One 1-D Analysis Software (Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). β-actin was employed to normalize the
amount of RNA used in each reaction.
Mouse tumors
Nude mice, Rag−/− or Rag−/−
IL-2Rγ−/− were obtained from The Jackson
Laboratory. Animal experiments were in accordance to Spanish laws and approval
was obtained from the animal experimentation committee of the University of
Navarra (Study 03/007 approval). These mice were injected with the tumor cell
lines HT29 (5×106 cells), CaCo2 (107 cells) or SW48
(5×106) to induce subcutaneous tumors. IL-8 in serum
samples was sequentially measured by ELISA (BD Biosciences). When indicated 3
mg/mouse of cyclophosphamide were injected i.p.
In vivo migration
Female nude mice, Rag−/− or Rag−/−
IL-2Rγ−/− as indicated, were subcutaneously
injected with 5×106 HT29 (n = 4),
10×106 CaCo2 (n = 4) or 106
SW48 (n = 3) tumor cells. When tumors reached about 1 cm
diameter, 106 mature DCs were labelled with 2.5 µM CFSE (Sigma,
Barcelona, Spain) or 4×10−6 M PKH26 (Sigma), washed and
injected intratumorally. Mouse IgG (100 µg, BD Pharmingen) or neutralizing
anti-humanIL-8 mAb (100 µg, BD Pharmingen) were coinjected within the
same syringe into the tumors. In case of HT29 and SW48, cell suspensions from
the tumors were generated with the GentleMacs dissociator device (Miltenyi
Biotec). Cell suspensions were analysed by FACS and fluorescent cells counted.
In the case of CaCo2 xenografts, three days later, tumors were mechanically
homogenized. Tissue homogenates were cleared from debris by centrifugation and
fluorescence was measured using a plate fluorimeter (Polarstar Galaxy, BMG).
Migration was calculated as fluorescence in the tumor divided by total input
fluorescence injected (fluorescence was quantified in arbitrary units).
Cytokine production by maturing DC
For in vitro stimulations, 105 DC were cultured 48 h
with medium alone (control), LPS (1 µg/mL) purchased from Sigma, R-848imidazoquinoline (1 mM) purchased from Pharmatech (Shangai, China) or sCD40L at
200 ng/mL purchased from Abnova (Taipei, Taiwan). After culture for 48 h,
supernatants were collected and the cytokine concentration was determined by
immunoassay. Commercially available ELISA kits were used for the detection of
IL-12p70 and IL-10 (BD Bioscience).
FACS analysis
FITC and PE-labeled mAb specific for the DC maturation markers: CD80, CD83, CD86
and HLA-DR (BD Bioscience) and isotype-matched labeled controls were used to
characterize cell surface phenotypes by flow cytometry. Dendritic cells
(105) were washed in cold PBS and incubated 15 min at 4°C
with specific FITC or PE-labeled Abs. MAbs against IL-8 receptors (CXCR1 and
CXCR2) were used by indirect fluorescence developed with a rabbit anti-mouse
antiserum tagged with FITC (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, West Grove, PA).
In vitro and in vivo MLR
In vitro MLR were performed as described [26]. Briefly, a total of
2×105 lymphocytes from a distinct donor were added on day 9
at different T cell∶DC ratios (1280∶1, 640∶1, 320∶1,
160∶1, 80∶1 and 40∶1). After 3 days, the
[methyl-3H]thymidine uptake was determined by the addition of 1
µCi of [methyl-3H]thymidine.Female Rag−/− IL-2Rγ−/− were
subcutaneously injected with 5×106 HT29 cells. When tumors
reached approximately 1 cm in diameter, these mice and tumor-free mice were
intraperitoneally injected with 1×106 DC and
5×106 PKH2-labeled PBLs. After 4 days, cells were obtained
by intraperitoneal lavages and samples were analysed using a FACSCalibur Flow
Cytometer (Becton Dickinson). The number of T cell divisions is proportional to
the dilution of PKH2 intensity and was found to be negligible in the absence of
DC (data not shown). For FACS analysis lymphocytes were gated based on FSC/SSC
features.
PMN purification and fluorescence labelling
In vitro neutrophil and DC migration was measured in Transwell
Chambers (5 µm; Corning Costar, Corning, NY). PMN cells were enriched by
sedimentation of peripheral blood mixed in a dextran (6% v/v) solution.
After sedimentation, floating fractions were collected. Red cells in the
resuspended pellets were osmotically lysed. The remaining cell suspensions were
layered onto Ficoll-Paque gradients and pellets were collected and washed after
centrifugation. Neutrophil purity was >95% (CD15bright
neutrophils)
In vitro chemotaxis assay
In vitro neutrophil and DC migration was measured in Transwell
Chambers (5 µm; Corning Costar, Corning, NY). Both PKH26-DCs
(105) and PKH2-labeled neutrophils (105) or only
PKH2-labeled neutrophils were added to the upper chamber and migration stimuli
were placed in the lower chamber. In this experiment IL-8 (R&D Systems) was
used at 20 ng/mL as positive control. In other cases PKH26-DCs with or without
IL-8 neutralizing mAb or IgG as control (BD Pharmigen) at 20 µg/mL was
placed in the lower chamber as indicated. Transmigrated cells in the lower
chamber were quantified using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) or
fluorescence microscopy imaging of the lower chamber. In some cases the lower
chamber contained a subconfluent monolayer of HT29 cells. The chemotactic index
was calculated as the number of migrated cells in the experimental conditions
divided by number of migrated cells in the negative control, which is complete
culture medium. In the experiments with HT29 cell in the lower chamber number of
PKH2-fluorescent DC per microscopic field (×20) in the lower chamber were
quantitated in triplicate wells by a blinded observer. Recombinant MIP3α was
from R&D.
Statistics
Comparisons were made with paired student's t tests. Values of p are given
in the corresponding experiments.
Results
HT29 and CaCo2 tumor cell lines xenografted into immunodeficient mice
generate tumors that produce IL-8
A panel of humancolon carcinomas was tested in order to identify cultures that
produce high amounts of IL-8 to the supernatant [1]. All clonal subcultures of
HT29 showed high homogeneous outputs of IL-8 while the SW48 cell line did not
reach detectable levels in any experiment, and CaCo2 subcultures showed around
one half of the production when compared to the levels attained by HT29 cells
cultured at identical density for the same period of time (Figure S1).
Microenvironment conditions and therapy may modify the ability of tumor cells to
produce IL-8. Figure 1A
shows that the production of IL-8 secreted to culture supernatants by viable
HT29 cells was reduced in 24 h by exposure to low concentrations
cyclophosphamide, while cells still preserved membrane integrity (>90%
viability by trypan blue exclusion). Interestingly, the low range of
cyclophosphamide concentrations was more effective at preventing IL-8
bioproduction and secretion to the supernatant. Gemcitabine and radiation did
not or more weakly affected IL-8 secretion (Figure 1A and data not shown). Moreover, in a
repeated set of experiments semiquantitative RT-PCR for IL-8 in comparison with
the house keeping mRNA β-actin showed that cyclophosphamide inhibits IL-8
production at the mRNA level in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1B), in such a way that low dose
cyclophosphamide was better at mediating this effect than higher
concentrations.
Figure 1
HT29 cells when xenografted secrete IL-8 to the plasma of the
mice.
ELISA determination of IL-8 in the supernatant of HT29 confluent cultures
in the presence of indicated concentrations of cyclophosphamide (1000 to
0.001 µg/mL), or gemcitabine (1000 to 0.1 µg/mL) during the
24 h prior to supernatant collection. When indicated the solution
vehicle of both drugs was added at the highest concentration. Results
represent mean±SEM from three experiments. (B) Separate set of
experiments as in A but in this case HT29 were collected and IL-8 mRNA
was quantified by RT-PCR. PCR bands are shown in the upper panel and
densitometry quantitative data given in the lower panel representing
relative expression of IL-8 mRNA in comparison with β-actin mRNA.
(C) Subcutaneously xenografted HT29 cells in
Rag−/− IL-2Rγ−/−
mice gave rise to progressing tumors (left axis depicting mean tumor
diameter) and increasing serial serum concentrations of human IL-8
(right axis). Results represent mean±SEM of three independent
experiments with 6 mice per experiment. Similar results were observed
with CaCo2 tumors xenografted in the peritoneal cavity (Figure
S1). (D) IL-8 serum concentrations of three individual
Rag−/− IL-2Rγ−/−
mice bearing HT29 tumors for seven days before a single intraperitoneal
injection of 3 mg of cyclophosphamide and 24 and 48 h after treatment.
The percentages of reduction at 24 h are indicated. Experiments were
repeated at least three times with the exception of (D) that was
performed with three individual animals.
HT29 cells when xenografted secrete IL-8 to the plasma of the
mice.
ELISA determination of IL-8 in the supernatant of HT29 confluent cultures
in the presence of indicated concentrations of cyclophosphamide (1000 to
0.001 µg/mL), or gemcitabine (1000 to 0.1 µg/mL) during the
24 h prior to supernatant collection. When indicated the solution
vehicle of both drugs was added at the highest concentration. Results
represent mean±SEM from three experiments. (B) Separate set of
experiments as in A but in this case HT29 were collected and IL-8 mRNA
was quantified by RT-PCR. PCR bands are shown in the upper panel and
densitometry quantitative data given in the lower panel representing
relative expression of IL-8 mRNA in comparison with β-actin mRNA.
(C) Subcutaneously xenografted HT29 cells in
Rag−/− IL-2Rγ−/−
mice gave rise to progressing tumors (left axis depicting mean tumor
diameter) and increasing serial serum concentrations of humanIL-8
(right axis). Results represent mean±SEM of three independent
experiments with 6 mice per experiment. Similar results were observed
with CaCo2tumors xenografted in the peritoneal cavity (Figure
S1). (D) IL-8 serum concentrations of three individual
Rag−/− IL-2Rγ−/−
mice bearing HT29 tumors for seven days before a single intraperitoneal
injection of 3 mg of cyclophosphamide and 24 and 48 h after treatment.
The percentages of reduction at 24 h are indicated. Experiments were
repeated at least three times with the exception of (D) that was
performed with three individual animals.These results open the possibility that IL-8 production can be acutely reduced by
cyclophosphamide for therapeutic purposes. Indeed, metronomic cyclophosphamide
is becoming an attractive alternative for cancer management [31] and
potentiation of a variety of immunotherapies [32].When HT29 was xenografted in athymic nude mice, it gave rise to subcutaneous
nodules that grew steadily over time (Figure 1C). Sequential sera samples from such
animals contained increasing concentrations of IL-8 (Figure 1C) that correlated with tumor
progression as reported in humanpatients [3].CaCo2 failed to graft as subcutaneous nodules in two thirds of cases (data not
shown), but grafted homogeneously as multiple peritoneal nodules if injected
intraperitoneally (Figure S2). CaCo2-grafted animals also showed
circulating IL-8 (Figure S2) but at lower concentrations if
compared to HT29-bearing mice, as expected from the productions of IL-8 in the
cell line cultures. Apart from this quantitative difference, the tendency was
similar in tumors from both cell lines.Importantly, treatment of mice with a single dose of 3 mg/mouse of
cyclophosphamide reduced the serum concentration of IL-8 in the next 24 h in a
range from 48 to 100% (Figure 1D), while those concentrations rapidly rebound in
48–72 h. It is of note that for this experiment mice with 7-day palpable
tumor xenografts were used, so the concentrations of IL-8 in plasma were still
low.In conclusion, xenografted colon carcinomas retain the property of producing high
amounts of humanIL-8, and our results indicate that such a function could be
modified by cyclophosphamide.
Exogenously injected human DC inside xenografted HT29 tumors are retained by
IL-8 in the tumor microenvironment
In order to study whether IL-8-producing tumors would retain intratumorally DC
injected inside the lesion, we first chose the HT29 xenografts because of their
higher bioproduction of IL-8.Human DC were derived from CD14+ monocytes in the presence of
GM-CSF and IL-4 and labeled with PKH26. Fluorescent DC were injected into HT29tumor nodules subcutaneously implanted into Rag−/−
IL-2Rγ−/− mice. In some of the mice, DC were
injected with control polyclonal mouse IgG antibody, while in other cases were
resuspended with 100 µg/mL of an anti-humanIL-8 neutralizing mAb. 72 h
after DC injection, tumors were removed and a single cell suspension was
generated. The number of fluorescent humanCD11c+ cells versus
total cells was quantified. As can be seen in figure 2A, IL-8 indeed retained DC
intratumorally since the neutralizing anti-IL-8 mAb decreased the number of
cells that remained inside the tumor by more than one half (Figure 2A). FACS analysis representing two
cases are shown in figure 2B
as an example. These results were confirmed in athymic nude mice bearing
subcutaneous CaCo-2 tumors (Figure S3) indicating that the phenomenon was
not exclusive of HT29-derived tumors.
Figure 2
IL-8 produced by tumor cells in vivo retains DC
inside xenografted tumor nodules.
(A) HT29 was xenografted into Rag−/−
IL-2Rγ−/− double KO mice. Tumor nodules,
8–12 mm in diameter, were injected with 5×106
PKH26-labeled monocyte-derived DC. When indicated, the 100 µL DC
suspensions contained 100 µg/mL of mouse IgG (control antibody) or
anti-IL-8 neutralizing mAb. The figure shows the proportion of
PKH26+ events with respect to total tumor cells upon
FACS analysis, three days after DC injection. Four mice with two
bilateral xenografted tumors each per condition were used. Of note, DC
cultured in the presence of the anti-IL-8 mAb at 100 µg/mL did not
show loss of viability at least in 72 h (data not shown). (B)
Representative FACS dot plots from A in two tumor nodules from two mice
are shown as an example. Similar data were obtained with xenografts of
the CaCo2 cell line (Figure S2). (C) Absence of
PKH26-labeled DC in 3 out of 3 SW48 xenografts processed as in A,
following injection of fluorescence labeled human DC. In the left
dot-plot, the fluorescence intensity of injected PKH26-labeled DC is
shown for reference. Dot plots are from representative experiment of two
actually performed with three animals per group each.
IL-8 produced by tumor cells in vivo retains DC
inside xenografted tumor nodules.
(A) HT29 was xenografted into Rag−/−
IL-2Rγ−/− double KO mice. Tumor nodules,
8–12 mm in diameter, were injected with 5×106
PKH26-labeled monocyte-derived DC. When indicated, the 100 µL DC
suspensions contained 100 µg/mL of mouse IgG (control antibody) or
anti-IL-8 neutralizing mAb. The figure shows the proportion of
PKH26+ events with respect to total tumor cells upon
FACS analysis, three days after DC injection. Four mice with two
bilateral xenografted tumors each per condition were used. Of note, DC
cultured in the presence of the anti-IL-8 mAb at 100 µg/mL did not
show loss of viability at least in 72 h (data not shown). (B)
Representative FACS dot plots from A in two tumor nodules from two mice
are shown as an example. Similar data were obtained with xenografts of
the CaCo2 cell line (Figure S2). (C) Absence of
PKH26-labeled DC in 3 out of 3 SW48 xenografts processed as in A,
following injection of fluorescence labeled human DC. In the left
dot-plot, the fluorescence intensity of injected PKH26-labeled DC is
shown for reference. Dot plots are from representative experiment of two
actually performed with three animals per group each.SW48 cells, that failed to produce IL-8 as shown in figure S1,
were xenografted in Rag−/− mice. In this case, the tumors
could not retain DC labeled with the fluorescent dye PKH26. Figure 2C shows representative dot plots from
three mice 72 h post intratumoral injection along with the fluorescence of input
DC (left dot-plot of figure
2C). These results on the colon cancer cell line that does not
produce IL-8 further indicate that this chemokine was important for the
retention of DC inside the tumor upon intratumoral release.
Lack of IL-8 effects on DC-mediated T-cell stimulation
Functional response to IL-8 involves signalling pathways that might alter DC
functions, since these cells are known to express CXCR1 and CXCR2 [1]. We explored
this question in detail using Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction (MLR) assays in which DC
were co-cultured in decreasing amounts with fully allogeneic Peripheral Blood
Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) containing alloreactive T-cells. When added during the
MLR reaction, IL-8 did not change the proliferation of T cells (Figure 3A) or the ensuing
production of INF-γ to the supernatant (data not shown).
Figure 3
IL-8 does not impair T cell stimulation by DC that express functional
CXCR1 and CXCR2.
(A) Human monocyte-derived DC and T-cells were seeded in the indicated
proportions. Functional recombinant IL-8 was added at different
concentrations as indicated in the graph legends. T-cell proliferation
was measured by 3H-thymidine incorporation 3 days later. A
representative case out of three independently performed experiments
with cells from different combinations of donors is shown. (B)
Experiments as in A, but in this case DC were incubated with the
indicated amounts of IL-8 added to monocytes during the 7-day
differentiation culture in the presence of GM-CSF+IL-4. A
representative experiment out of at least three is shown. (C) Similar
experiments as in B but in this case IL-8 at the indicated
concentrations was added during the maturation 48 h culture onto
differentiated DC matured for 48 h with IFN-α, TNF-α and poly
I:C. A representative experiment out of at least three performed is
shown. As a control every IL-8 batch was shown to readily attract human
PMNs in chemotaxis assays (Figure S3). (D) Mature DC as those
used for the MLRs were tested by indirect immunofluorescence for the
expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2. Incubation with 100 ng/mL of IL-8 during
2 h resulted in a loss of fluorescence intensity upon immunostaining of
the surface receptors indicating receptor internalization. The mean
fluorescence intensity (MFI) of each histogram is provided. FACS
Experiments were repeated in two occasions with similar results.
IL-8 does not impair T cell stimulation by DC that express functional
CXCR1 and CXCR2.
(A) Human monocyte-derived DC and T-cells were seeded in the indicated
proportions. Functional recombinant IL-8 was added at different
concentrations as indicated in the graph legends. T-cell proliferation
was measured by 3H-thymidine incorporation 3 days later. A
representative case out of three independently performed experiments
with cells from different combinations of donors is shown. (B)
Experiments as in A, but in this case DC were incubated with the
indicated amounts of IL-8 added to monocytes during the 7-day
differentiation culture in the presence of GM-CSF+IL-4. A
representative experiment out of at least three is shown. (C) Similar
experiments as in B but in this case IL-8 at the indicated
concentrations was added during the maturation 48 h culture onto
differentiated DC matured for 48 h with IFN-α, TNF-α and poly
I:C. A representative experiment out of at least three performed is
shown. As a control every IL-8 batch was shown to readily attract human
PMNs in chemotaxis assays (Figure S3). (D) Mature DC as those
used for the MLRs were tested by indirect immunofluorescence for the
expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2. Incubation with 100 ng/mL of IL-8 during
2 h resulted in a loss of fluorescence intensity upon immunostaining of
the surface receptors indicating receptor internalization. The mean
fluorescence intensity (MFI) of each histogram is provided. FACS
Experiments were repeated in two occasions with similar results.DC were derived from CD14+ monocytes in the presence of GM-CSF
and IL-4 and during this process we had observed that tumor-derived compounds
impair differentiation [26]. However, in the case of IL-8 as a recombinant
protein, resulting DC stimulated allogenic MLRs as strongly as those DC derived
in the absence of the IL-8 chemokine (Figure 3B).Alternatively, IL-8 could alter the maturation/activation of DC [29]. To induce
maturation, DC were incubated for 48 h with a mixture of INF-α, TNF-α
and Poly I:C in the presence or absence of IL-8. No change was observed again in
the ability of DC to induce proliferation of allogeneic T lymphocytes (Figure 3C). To rule out
alterations of the recombinant protein used, in every case, IL-8 was controlled
for functionality since it readily attracted human neutrophils, as shown in
chemotaxis assays (Figure S4).We had previously shown that DC expressed CXCR1 and CXCR2 [1]. We observed that the
exposure to the ligand for two hours induced the modulation/internalization of
both receptors (Figure 3D)
in the very same DC used to set up the T-cell allostimulation experiments.
Therefore, the pathways guiding IL-8-directed migration and those governing the
capabilities for T-cell stimulation seem to be fairly independent in the DC.The absence of effects on T cell∶DC co-cultures suggested that the
molecular factors employed by the DC for T cell activation were not affected by
IL-8.Indeed, table
S1 shows that IL-8 at various concentrations does not alter the level
of expression the maturation markers CD80, CD83, CD86 and MHC class II on mature
and immature DC. Moreover, IL-8 did not alter the production of IL-12 and IL-10
upon maturation as induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) plus the R-848imidazoquinoline or recombinant CD40L (Figure S5).Furthermore, we explored the issue of whether immunodeficient animals bearing
IL-8-producing tumors would impair MLR alloreactions of human leukocytes seeded
inside their peritoneal cavities. For this purpose, we grafted HT29 tumors for
5–7 weeks and co-injected PKH2-labeled PBL and allogeneic DC inside the
peritoneal cavity. As can be seen in figure 4, T cells readily proliferated in
tumor-free mice within 4 days and such proliferative responses were clearly
downsized by the presence of subcutaneous tumors.
Figure 4
Impairment of DC-induced human T-cell proliferation inside the
peritoneum of HT29 xenografted mice.
(A) Rag−/− IL-2γR−/−
mice (3 per group) were xenografted with HT29 cells or remained
tumor-free. Four weeks later mice received intraperitoneal injections of
human PKH2-labeled PBLs and fully allogenic mature DC (ratio 5∶1
to a total of 6×106 cells). Proliferation was monitored
four days later by dye dilution on FACS-gated lymphocytes from
peritoneal lavages by dilution of the fluorescent dye. In the group of
indicated mice an intraperitoneal injection of 100 µg of
neutralizing anti-IL-8 mAb was provided immediately following the
injection of PBLs and DC. Percentages of dividing lymphocytes in each
log cursor interval are shown in the histograms. Fluorescence intensity
in the input undivided PBL was over 95% above the third log
interval (upper histogram). (B) Similar experiments as in A, quantifying
PKH2-dilution as the percentage of cells that reach the 3rd
and 4th log scales of the flow cytometry histograms. Log
regions are depicted in the upper histogram of A. Data from animals
bearing subcutaneous SW48 xenografts, that do not produce IL-8, have
been included. Data represent mean±SD.
Impairment of DC-induced human T-cell proliferation inside the
peritoneum of HT29 xenografted mice.
(A) Rag−/− IL-2γR−/−
mice (3 per group) were xenografted with HT29 cells or remained
tumor-free. Four weeks later mice received intraperitoneal injections of
human PKH2-labeled PBLs and fully allogenic mature DC (ratio 5∶1
to a total of 6×106 cells). Proliferation was monitored
four days later by dye dilution on FACS-gated lymphocytes from
peritoneal lavages by dilution of the fluorescent dye. In the group of
indicated mice an intraperitoneal injection of 100 µg of
neutralizing anti-IL-8 mAb was provided immediately following the
injection of PBLs and DC. Percentages of dividing lymphocytes in each
log cursor interval are shown in the histograms. Fluorescence intensity
in the input undivided PBL was over 95% above the third log
interval (upper histogram). (B) Similar experiments as in A, quantifying
PKH2-dilution as the percentage of cells that reach the 3rd
and 4th log scales of the flow cytometry histograms. Log
regions are depicted in the upper histogram of A. Data from animals
bearing subcutaneous SW48 xenografts, that do not produce IL-8, have
been included. Data represent mean±SD.If neutralizing anti-IL-8 mAb was co-injected with the PBL and the allogenic DC,
no recovery of proliferation was observed. This is interpreted in the sense that
factors other than IL-8 down-regulate T-cell proliferation. This is in agreement
with the lack of IL-8 effects on DC-mediated T-cell stimulation in the
in vitro alloreactive co-cultures.In addition, we performed experiments (shown in figure 4B) that demonstrate that treatment of
the HT29-xenografted mice with cyclophosphamide did not improve the alloreactive
T-cell stimulation. Moreover SW48 xenografts, that do not produce IL-8, also
inhibit the intraperitoneal alloreactive response to an extent comparable to
that observed with HT29 (Figure
4B).Regardless the fact that there is no IL-8 homologue gene in the mouse genome,
humanIL-8 exerts at least some agonist activity on mouseCXCR1 as described
[6]. Indeed,
we were able to observe IL-8 chemotactic activity on mouse bone marrow-derived
DC (Figure
S6A). Therefore we set up experiments in which we activated
CD4+ TCR-transgenic OT-2 T cells responding to ovalbumin in
the peritoneal cavity of Rag−/−
IL-2Rγ−/− mice. DC were pulsed with the cognate
peptide and the mice were bearing or not established HT29 subcutaneous tumors.
As shown in figures S6B and C, HT29 tumors also suppressed proliferation of the
mouse T cells in this setting, although such an inhibition was not affected
again by IL-8 neutralizing antibodies. Our data further indicate the existence
of immunosuppressive factors in the tumor bearing mice which are different from
IL-8.
Pre-exposure of DC to IL-8 disorient DC to subsequently follow IL-8-guided
migration
DC in tumor bearing subjects would be chronically exposed to IL-8. As we have
shown in figure 3D, exposure
of DC to IL-8 determines receptor downregulation. Therefore we hypothesized that
pre-incubation of DC with IL-8 could inhibit subsequent responses to IL-8
gradients.In figure 5, chemotactic
experiments were set up plating IL-8-producing HT29 cells in the lower chamber
and PKH2-labelled DC in the upper chamber. The colon carcinoma cell line induced
migration of DC in 16 h that was abolished by anti-IL8 neutralizing mAb.
Interestingly, if DC had been pre-exposed for 24 h to recombinant IL-8,
migration was also abolished indicating that desensitized DC could not migrate
towards the IL-8-producing carcinoma cells. Data are quantified in figure 5B, which also shows
that monolayers of the SW48 (the cell line that does not produce IL-8) also fail
to attract DC. Likewise, pre-treatment of the HT29 cells with low concentrations
of cyclophosphamide decreased the ability of HT29 to attract DC because of
reducing IL-8 secretion (Figure
5C).
Figure 5
DC pre-exposed to IL-8 become desensitized to respond to
carcinoma-derived IL-8 as a chemoattractant.
(A) Chemotaxis assays were set up with HT29 confluent monolayers in the
lower chamber and fluorescent DC in the upper chamber. Phase contrast
microscopy images and the corresponding UV fluorescence microscopic
fields of the lower chamber are shown. When indicated the lower chamber
contained neutralizing anti-IL-8 mAb (20 µg/mL) or the DC had been
pre-exposed for 24 h to recombinant IL-8 (1 µg/mL). (B) In the
upper panel representation of data from three independent experiments
similarly performed to those in A with HT29 cells represented as
mean±SD in which four random fields were counted for each
triplicate well. In the lower panel experiments performed as in A, but
in this case the confluent monolayers in the lower chamber were formed
by SW48 cells that do not produce IL-8. (C) Experiments as in A, but in
this case HT29 cells had been pretreated with various cyclophosphamide
concentrations for 24 h as indicated in the figure. Results represent
mean±SD.
DC pre-exposed to IL-8 become desensitized to respond to
carcinoma-derived IL-8 as a chemoattractant.
(A) Chemotaxis assays were set up with HT29 confluent monolayers in the
lower chamber and fluorescent DC in the upper chamber. Phase contrast
microscopy images and the corresponding UV fluorescence microscopic
fields of the lower chamber are shown. When indicated the lower chamber
contained neutralizing anti-IL-8 mAb (20 µg/mL) or the DC had been
pre-exposed for 24 h to recombinant IL-8 (1 µg/mL). (B) In the
upper panel representation of data from three independent experiments
similarly performed to those in A with HT29 cells represented as
mean±SD in which four random fields were counted for each
triplicate well. In the lower panel experiments performed as in A, but
in this case the confluent monolayers in the lower chamber were formed
by SW48 cells that do not produce IL-8. (C) Experiments as in A, but in
this case HT29 cells had been pretreated with various cyclophosphamide
concentrations for 24 h as indicated in the figure. Results represent
mean±SD.Therefore while IL-8 seems to leave T cell stimulation by DC unimpaired, chronic
exposure to IL-8 may profoundly affect the migration capabilities of DC towards
IL-8 gradients and possibly of other leukocyte subsets as well.In a previous study we reported that DC produce IL-8 [1]. Figure S7A
confirms that DC produce IL-8 at the protein and mRNA level. It was conceivable
the autocrine IL-8 may downregulate CXCR1 and CXCR2 expression, as seen in figure 3D with exogenously
added IL-8. Indeed, we observed brighter immunofluorescence specific for CXCR1
and CXCR2 when IL-8 was neutralized with a specific mAb (Figures S7B and
C) and when DC were cultured at very low cell densities upon
agitation to dilute the secreted IL-8 (Figures S7B, C and D). Therefore autocrine
IL-8 determines the level of receptor surface expression in DC providing an
interesting mode of regulation.
IL-8 produced by DC retains and attracts neutrophils
A function of IL-8 could be to favor a rendezvous between polymorphonuclear (PMN)
cells and DC by co-attracting both subsets of leukocytes. In our hands, both
immature and mature DC produce abundant IL-8, although mature DC produce about
four-five-fold more quantity on a per cell basis (Figure
S7).Classical chemotaxis assays were set up to determine if IL8 could regulate DC and
PMN migration in a concerted fashion. As can be seen in figure 6A and figure S4,
neutrophils are attracted by recombinant IL-8. However, if neutrophils are
seeded together with DC (at 1∶1 ratio), neutrophil migration as induced by
IL-8 was abolished. These data might indicate that DC have a means to attract
and/or retain PMNs that otherwise would migrate away.
Figure 6
DCs retain neutrophils in migration assays towards IL-8 and attract
neutrophils in an IL-8-dependent fashion.
(A) Transwell chemotaxis assays were set up with PKH2-labeled
neutrophils. Neutrophils migrated to recombinant IL-8 added to the lower
chamber. However, if neutrophils are seeded in the upper chamber
together with DC (1∶1) migration is totally impaired. Of note
there is IL-8 by the DC as shown in figure
S6A. This experiment is representative of two independently
performed in triplicate wells with migration lasting for 120 min. (B)
Percentage of migration of PKH2-labeled neutrophils that were seeded
into the upper chamber of transwell migration assays towards recombinant
IL-8 or DC placed in the lower chamber. When indicated,
IL-8-neutralizing mAb (20 µg/mL) was added to the lower chamber
along with the DC. Migration was analyzed at 120 minutes. Similar
experiments analyzed as early as 60 minutes rendered similar results
(data not shown). Results are representative of two separate triplicate
experiments independently performed. Asterisks indicate statistical
significance p<0.01 in student's t tests.
DCs retain neutrophils in migration assays towards IL-8 and attract
neutrophils in an IL-8-dependent fashion.
(A) Transwell chemotaxis assays were set up with PKH2-labeled
neutrophils. Neutrophils migrated to recombinant IL-8 added to the lower
chamber. However, if neutrophils are seeded in the upper chamber
together with DC (1∶1) migration is totally impaired. Of note
there is IL-8 by the DC as shown in figure
S6A. This experiment is representative of two independently
performed in triplicate wells with migration lasting for 120 min. (B)
Percentage of migration of PKH2-labeled neutrophils that were seeded
into the upper chamber of transwell migration assays towards recombinant
IL-8 or DC placed in the lower chamber. When indicated,
IL-8-neutralizing mAb (20 µg/mL) was added to the lower chamber
along with the DC. Migration was analyzed at 120 minutes. Similar
experiments analyzed as early as 60 minutes rendered similar results
(data not shown). Results are representative of two separate triplicate
experiments independently performed. Asterisks indicate statistical
significance p<0.01 in student's t tests.If the assays were set up with PMNs in the upper and DC in the lower chamber,
neutrophils were attracted by DC seeded into the lower chamber. Importantly,
addition of neutralizing anti-IL-8 mAb eliminated most of the attraction of
fluorescence-labeled neutrophils by the DC seeded in the lower chamber (Figure 6B) while control
antibody exerted no effect.Our results as a whole indicate that although IL-8, abundantly produced by
tumors, would not damage DC-mediated stimulation of T-cells. However,
tumor-derived IL-8 would alter migration and interactions with other leukocyte
subtypes such as neutrophils. For instance, if DC are prevented from migrating
towards MIP3α gradients by HT29 supernatants they would reach the
inflammatory focus in lesser numbers and as a result would stimulate T cells
less efficiently (Figure S8). IL-8-disoriented migration could
thereby contribute to weaken immune responses to cancer.
IL-8 produced by tumor xenografts attracts DC to the tumor tissue unless they
have been desensitized by pre-exposure to IL-8
As seen in figure 1, HT29
xenografts are sites of intense IL-8 production. Therefore we reasoned that DC
injected in the subcutaneous tissue 5 mm away from the tumor (Figure 7A) should be attracted
to the tumor nodule. Indeed, fluorescence-labelled DC were recovered from the
tumor tissue and such migratory behaviour was inhibited if DC were co-injected
with the neutralizing anti-IL-8 mAb (Figure 7B). More importantly, pre-exposure of
the DC cultures to IL-8 for 24 h prior to injection also greatly impaired the
migration towards the tumor. Therefore tumors can attract DC by means of IL-8
but chronic exposure to IL-8 desensitizes DC for this in vivo migration. Owing
to these effects, IL-8 produced at malignant lesions profoundly impairs the
migratory orientation of DC.
Figure 7
HT29 xenografts attract human DC injected in the subcutaneous tissue
which surrounds the tumor.
(A) Mice bearing HT29 established xenografts as the one shown in the
pictures were injected approximately 5 mm away from the tumor lesion
with 5×106 human immature DC labelled with PKH2 that
were resuspended in 50 µl of saline buffer to form a small
subcutaneous bump which disappeared in less than 2 hours. (B) 24 hours
later tumors were surgically removed and a cell suspension was obtained
in which the number of fluorescent DC were enumerated by flow cytometry
and normalized as the percentage of injected DC that were recovered from
the tumor. When indicated DC were pre-treated for 24 hours in culture
with 1 µg/ml of rIL-8 or DC were co-injected with 100 µg of
neutralizing anti-IL8 mAb.
HT29 xenografts attract human DC injected in the subcutaneous tissue
which surrounds the tumor.
(A) Mice bearing HT29 established xenografts as the one shown in the
pictures were injected approximately 5 mm away from the tumor lesion
with 5×106 human immature DC labelled with PKH2 that
were resuspended in 50 µl of saline buffer to form a small
subcutaneous bump which disappeared in less than 2 hours. (B) 24 hours
later tumors were surgically removed and a cell suspension was obtained
in which the number of fluorescent DC were enumerated by flow cytometry
and normalized as the percentage of injected DC that were recovered from
the tumor. When indicated DC were pre-treated for 24 hours in culture
with 1 µg/ml of rIL-8 or DC were co-injected with 100 µg of
neutralizing anti-IL8 mAb.
Discussion
By producing IL-8, tumors may profoundly alter the migration-guiding gradients of
this important chemokine in the tissues of tumor-bearing hosts [33]. Indeed, the chemokine
network is well known to modify cancer biology in multiple ways from metastasis and
angiogenesis to the attraction of a nurturing leukocyte infiltrates [33]. In this
study, we demonstrate that IL-8 as produced by humantumor cells is capable of
attracting (or retaining) human DC in vivo, but that IL-8 does not
functionally affect the ability of DC to stimulate alloreactive T cells.We found that at least in vitro, IL-8 production by tumor cells can
be decreased by low dose cyclophosphamide at the protein and mRNA level. In
vivo this is reflected by transient decreases in the serum
concentration of the chemokine in circulating blood. The rapid decrease and recovery
of serum concentrations indicate the rapid turnover in blood of a polypeptide below
the renal filtration threshold and with a short half-life [34]. We are exploring the
therapeutic implications of low-dose cyclophosphamide effects on IL-8
patho-phisiology. In fact, this effects on IL-8 output can be a factor behind the
beneficial effects of the described metronomic dosing of the drug [31], [32]. In
addition acute reductions in IL-8 output as induced by cyclophosphamide might be
exploited to support intratumoral injections of DC in order to favor migration to
lymph nodes.In a clinical trial IL-8 was suspected to mediate intratumoral retention of DC
artificially delivered in such locations by image-guided procedures of injection
[1]. However,
the role of IL-8 at in vivo retention could not be experimentally
documented. In this study, we observe that DC are retained inside xenografted colon
carcinomas by IL-8. The evidence was generated by means of a neutralizing anti-IL-8
mAb injected alongside the DC. These findings further support our interpretations
with regard to the apparent retention of intratumorally injected DC in patients
according to scintigraphic scans [1], [2].In our mouse xenograft system, we do not yet understand whether migration out of
tumors is the result of chemotaxis driven by mouse factors or random migration. What
we document is that IL-8 mediates the retention inside the tumor microenvironment.
This is not a surprise since IL-8 receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, are expressed on DC
and are functional in classical chemotaxis assays [1]. The production of IL-8 by DC
themselves could be also operating in an autocrine or paracrine fashion in this
intratumoral setting. Nonetheless, we clearly observe that HT29tumor xenografts are
capable to chemoattract DC when injected in the connective tissue that surrounds the
malignancy.The IL-8 receptors, when ligated, turn on various signaling pathways [35] and rearrange
the cytoskeleton [13]. IL-8 could thereby potentially alter the functional
performance of DC. Therefore we hypothesized that DC under the influence of IL-8 in
the tumor, would be poorer T cell stimulators. However, fully functional IL-8 (as
checked in migration assays) was completely incapable of decreasing T-cell
allostimulation as mediated by DC. This is in agreement with the fact that IL-8 does
not affect the expression of costimulatory receptors or T-cell stimulating
cytokines. It remains to be seen if IL-8 alters the antigen presenting machinery or
other biological activities of DC that are not required for alloreactive
stimulation. Although not formally ruled out, this possibility is considered
unlikely.Nonetheless, if DC were retained in the tumor milieu by IL-8, those DC would remain
under the concentrated influence of tumor-derived factors that repress DC functions
[26], [36], [37], [38]. Evidence for this
phenomenon also comes out from our alloreactive reactions of human lymphocytes
inside the peritoneum of immunodeficientmice bearing HT29 and SW48 xenografts [39]. Some of the
malignant tissue immunorepressor molecules include TGF-β [40], [41], VEGF [42], [43], interleukin-13 [44],
prostaglandins, kynurerines [40] and most likely other unknown polypeptide moieties [26], as well as
certain lipids [45].Collectively, our data can be interpreted in the sense that IL-8 retains DC in the
precise location where such antigen presenting cells are most efficiently damaged in
their function by tumor-derived biomolecules. Our results regarding the in
vivo inhibition of T-cell allostimulation in animals xenografted with
humantumors offer a useful experimental system to dissect tumor-dependent
mechanisms of inhibition that are operating distantly from the tumor implant. This
experimental tool is employed in our laboratory [39].DC intratumoral retention has been described as an evasion strategy in breast cancers
[46]. We can
observe in in vitro chemotaxis that if HT29 cells prevent DC from
migrating to MIP3α mimicking an inflammatory focus then fewer DC reach the
location to stimulate T cells and the immune response is accordingly less
intense.These phenomena certainly pose an obstacle for the intratumoral route of DC
administration in human immunotherapy [11], an approach that has been
described to be very successful in a number mouse models [47], [48], [49], [50]. From the therapeutic point of
view, low doses of cyclophosphamide can be useful to reduce IL-8 output by viable
tumor cells. Neutralization of IL-8 with mAb could be also therapeutically feasible.
This has been recently demonstrated in a situation in which tumor xenografts escape
from sunitinib-induced anti-angiogenesis by means of an IL-8-dependent mechanism
[19].IL-8 attracts neutrophils and possibly immature forms such as myeloid derived
suppressor cells [37], [51]. Interestingly, DC secrete IL-8 that may act in an
autocrine fashion [1]. Apart from these largely unexplored autocrine effects
that modulate CXCR1 and CXCR2 surface levels; we show that DC are capable of
attracting or retaining neutrophils in an IL-8-dependent fashion. The physiological
consequences of DC-neutrophil interactions [52] in the tumor context are
currently being actively explored in our laboratory, with emphasis on the
implications for cross-presentation of tumor antigens [53], [54].What seems also plausible is that under high circulating levels of IL-8, as occurs in
HT29-xenografted mice or patients with bulky disease, migration-driving gradients of
IL-8 would be disrupted and thereby DC-production of IL-8 might be overwhelmed in
its ability to attract neutrophils and other leukocytes. Indeed, we have obtained
evidence in the sense that overwhelming pre-exposure to IL-8 results in
desensitization of the DC to the chemotactic effects of IL-8. In other words, this
could mean that DC chronically exposed to IL-8 in the context of tumor-bearing hosts
would become disoriented and thus unable to follow migration cues set up by IL-8
concentration gradients. In vivo evidence of desensitization for
migration further supports this notion. Such immune disorientation as caused by the
abundantly and ectopically expressed chemokine may result in disordered immune
responses and ought to have relevant prognostic consequences for patients.Colon carcinoma cell lines HT29 and CaCo2 produce high levels of IL-8
in a clonal stable fashion while SW48 does not produce IL-8.
Clonal limiting dilution subcultures (four for each cell line) of the colon
cancer-derived cell lines HT29, CaCo2 and SW48 were tested for the
production of IL-8 as measured in 24 h culture supernatants by ELISA.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.CaCo2carcinoma cells xenografted in immunodeficientmice develop
progressive intraperitoneal tumors that correlate with raising serum
concentrations of IL-8. Intraperitoneally xenografted CaCo2 cells
developed progressive peritoneal colon carcinomas in athymic nude mice
(measured as weight increase in the left axis) and accumulated increasing
concentrations of serum IL-8 (right axis).(TIF)Click here for additional data file.DC are retained inside CaCo2tumors in a IL-8-dependent fashion.
CaCo2 cells were xenografted in athymic nude mice. Only 1/3 of such animals
successfully xenografted tumor lesions. Tumor nodules, 8–12 mm in
diameter, were injected with CFSE-labeled human DC derived from monocytes,
as in A. DC were injected in 100 µL of saline buffer with control
antibody or neutralizing anti-IL-8 mAb. In these cases, tumors were
homogenated and cleared of debris by centrifugation. Fluorescence in the
lysate was measured in a fluorimeter. The amount of fluorescence remaining
in the tumor compared to that present in the lysate from an identical number
of DC before being injected in the tumor was quantitated. Data are presented
as the percentage of fluorescence lost from the tumor. Experiments were
performed with four mice bearing a single tumor nodule. The inset shows a
correlation of fluorescence (arbitrary units) and number of DC in lysates
containing increasing amounts of CFSE-labeled DC.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Recombinant IL-8 rendering negative results at modifying DC
functionality is capable of attracting PMNs. Migration transwell
assays with purified neutrophils in the upper chamber and different
concentrations of the recombinant IL-8 in the lower chamber to prove that
IL-8 used in figure 3A, B, C
and D was fully functional.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.IL-8 does not modify IL-12 nor IL-10 secretion by DC matured in the
presence of LPS+R848 or trimerized CD40L. IL-12 and IL-10
were quantified in the supernatant of DC cultures treated with the indicated
concentrations of IL-8 during the 48 h maturation culture. Concentrations
(mean±SD) represent triplicate wells from a single experiment.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Activation of antigen specific murineCD4 T cells by DC in mice bearing
HT29 tumors is suppressed by factors distinct from IL-8. (A)
Mouse BM-derived DC [50], [55] were subjected to classical transwell chemotaxis
assays towards culture medium (control), 105 heat-inactivated E.
coli bacteria used as a positive control, or recombinant IL-8 as indicated.
Data show a modest but reproducible attraction of mouse DC by human
recombinant IL-8. (B) Schematic representation of experiments in which
HT29-bearing Rag−/−
IL-2Rγ−/− mice were injected in the
peritoneal cavity with 5×106 CFSE-labelled CD4 OT-2 cells
[56]
and 106 syngeneic DC pulsed with the OVA323-339 synthetic
peptide. (C) Assessment of OT-2 T-cell proliferation by dilution of CFSE as
in figure 4. Experiments
were performed in mice bearing or not HT29 tumors with or without cognate
peptide stimulation by the DC (n = 3 mice per group).
When indicated 100 µg of anti-IL8 mAb were co-injected into the
peritoneal cavity.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.DC produce IL-8 and such autocrine IL-8 modulates in part the surface
expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2. (A) Left axis: IL-8 concentration
in the supernatant of mature (mDC) and immature DC (iDC); Right axis: mRNA
encoding IL-8 in the corresponding DC cultures assessed by semi quantitative
RT-PCR. (B and C) IL-8 concentration in the supernatant (left axes) and
CXCR1 (B) and CXCR2 (C) surface expression as mean fluorescence intensity
(MFI) analyzed by FACS (right axes). In B and C a mAb neutralising IL-8 (20
µg/ml) was added when indicated, or the DC were cultured under gentle
agitation at the cellular densities given. Results are presented as
mean±SD from triplicate experiments. IL-8 neutralisation or lower IL8
concentrations in the supernatants correlate with higher MFIs for CXCR1 and
CXCR2 on the DC. (D) Shows representative FACS histograms from B and C.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.IL-8 in conditioned supernatants from HT29 cells impedes DC from
migrating to MIP3α gradients. As a consequence fewer DC
reaching the lower chamber results in less T-cell allostimulatory activity
at this location. In order to model whether DC-disoriented migration would
give rise to less T cell stimulation, we set up in the left panel chemotaxis
assays in which DC migrated towards recombinant MIP3α (100 µg/ml).
Data are presented as mean±SD of the chemotactic index normalized
with culture medium without MIP3α (Neg). DC were seeded in the upper
chamber with or without conditioned medium of HT29 cells or SW48 cells as
indicated. When indicated an IL-8 neutralising antibody was added. In the
right panel DC recovered from the lower chamber were used to stimulate
allogenic PBL, and T-cell proliferation was recorded three days later as
c.p.m. in 3H-Thy incorporation assays. Data represent three
independent replicates.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Lack of IL-8 effect on surface expression of dendritic cell maturation
markers. Mean fluorescence intensity of the indicated surface
markers of DC upon FACS analyses in human DC (mean±SD from three
different experiments) using either immature (iDC) or LPS+R848 matured
DC (mDC), that were cultured in the absence or the presence of increasing
concentrations of IL-8 as indicated in the columns. Experiments are
representative of three similarly performed with different donors.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Ingrid U Schraufstatter; Khanh Trieu; Ming Zhao; David M Rose; Robert A Terkeltaub; Meike Burger Journal: J Immunol Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Alfonso MartIn-Fontecha; Silvia Sebastiani; Uta E Höpken; Mariagrazia Uguccioni; Martin Lipp; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Federica Sallusto Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2003-08-18 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Vivek Subbiah; Ravi Murthy; David S Hong; Robert M Prins; Chitra Hosing; Kyle Hendricks; Deepthi Kolli; Lori Noffsinger; Robert Brown; Mary McGuire; Siquing Fu; Sarina Piha-Paul; Aung Naing; Anthony P Conley; Robert S Benjamin; Indreshpal Kaur; Marnix L Bosch Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Carlos Alfaro; Natalia Suarez; Carmen Oñate; Jose L Perez-Gracia; Ivan Martinez-Forero; Sandra Hervas-Stubbs; Inmaculada Rodriguez; Guiomar Perez; Elixabet Bolaños; Asis Palazon; Miguel Fernandez de Sanmamed; Aizea Morales-Kastresana; Alvaro Gonzalez; Ignacio Melero Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jiamin Zhou; Yi Xiang; Teizo Yoshimura; Keqiang Chen; Wanghua Gong; Jian Huang; Ye Zhou; Xiaohong Yao; Xiuwu Bian; Ji Ming Wang Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Felipe Melo-Gonzalez; Thomas M Fenton; Cecilia Forss; Catherine Smedley; Anu Goenka; Andrew S MacDonald; David J Thornton; Mark A Travis Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 5.157