In the endoplasmic reticulum, calreticulin acts as a chaperone and a Ca(2+)-signalling protein. At the cell surface, it mediates numerous important biological effects. The crystal structure of the human calreticulin globular domain was solved at 1.55 Å resolution. Interactions of the flexible N-terminal extension with the edge of the lectin site are consistently observed, revealing a hitherto unidentified peptide-binding site. A calreticulin molecular zipper, observed in all crystal lattices, could further extend this site by creating a binding cavity lined by hydrophobic residues. These data thus provide a first structural insight into the lectin-independent binding properties of calreticulin and suggest new working hypotheses, including that of a multi-molecular mechanism.
In the endoplasmic reticulum, calreticulin acts as a chaperone and a Ca(2+)-signalling protein. At the cell surface, it mediates numerous important biological effects. The crystal structure of the humancalreticulin globular domain was solved at 1.55 Å resolution. Interactions of the flexible N-terminal extension with the edge of the lectin site are consistently observed, revealing a hitherto unidentified peptide-binding site. A calreticulin molecular zipper, observed in all crystal lattices, could further extend this site by creating a binding cavity lined by hydrophobic residues. These data thus provide a first structural insight into the lectin-independent binding properties of calreticulin and suggest new working hypotheses, including that of a multi-molecular mechanism.
Calreticulin (CRT) is an intriguing multi-compartmental protein involved in many
cellular processes with broad patho-physiological implications [1], [2]. In addition to its
well-characterized function as a carbohydrate and non-native-peptide-recognizing
chaperone and Ca2+-signaling molecule in the endoplasmic reticulum
[3], CRT was
shown to play a key role in the MHC class I assembly pathway [4], [5]. CRT also moves to the cell
surface and extracellular milieu, where it is involved in a variety of other
important functions, such as cell adhesion, migration and proliferation, or wound
healing [1], [2]. Finally CRT
was recently proposed to be a surface ‘eat-me’ signal of dying cells,
also conserved in drosophila [6]–[8]. The molecular and structural determinants involved in
these various CRT properties still need to be deciphered, except for the lectin
binding site [9].CRT and its membrane-bound homologue calnexin (CNX) both comprise an extended
proline-rich P-domain inserted between N- and C-terminal domains, called N and C,
the latter bearing a highly charged extremity (Figure 1). The pioneering crystallographic
analysis of a large fragment from CNX has revealed an extended P-domain inserted
into a globular legume lectin-like domain [10], but available structural data
for CRT have long been restricted to the NMR structure of its P-domain [11]. To gain
further structural insights on this protein, we have solved the X-ray structure of
the humanCRT globular domain. The structure is compared to that of CNX [10] and of the
lectin domain of mouseCRT released very recently [9]. Two patches of evolutionary
conserved surface residues are described, emphasizing their atypical properties and
functional roles. Careful analysis of the crystal packing interactions reveals that
the disordered N-terminal extension binds to the edge of the lectin site and that an
intriguing CRT molecular zipper could provide a larger binding platform. These
observations provide a new structural basis for the non-lectin chaperone activity of
CRT.
Figure 1
Structure of the human CRT globular domain.
(A) Representation of the linear structure of CRT and of the construct used
in this study. N, P, C, the discontinuous CRT segments as defined usually.
Amino acid numbering is that of the unprocessed polypeptide. HAT, His-tag;
fX cl., factor X cleavage site. (B) Two different views of the CRT globular
domain structure. Regions from the N and C segments are colored light blue
and dark blue, respectively. The Ca2+ ion is represented as
a golden sphere. The approximate location of the P-domain insertion is
indicated. (C) Structural alignment of human CRT and dog CNX. The positions
of ß-strands and α-helices are indicated. The N-terminal extension
and the linker are shown in pink. Grey italics show residues not defined in
the structure. Residues aligned (−) or defining the common core of
human CRT and rat CNX (+) are indicated. Residues included in the
conserved clusters 1 and 2 are labeled 1 (green) and 2 (red),
respectively.
Structure of the human CRT globular domain.
(A) Representation of the linear structure of CRT and of the construct used
in this study. N, P, C, the discontinuous CRT segments as defined usually.
Amino acid numbering is that of the unprocessed polypeptide. HAT, His-tag;
fX cl., factor X cleavage site. (B) Two different views of the CRT globular
domain structure. Regions from the N and C segments are colored light blue
and dark blue, respectively. The Ca2+ ion is represented as
a golden sphere. The approximate location of the P-domain insertion is
indicated. (C) Structural alignment of humanCRT and dogCNX. The positions
of ß-strands and α-helices are indicated. The N-terminal extension
and the linker are shown in pink. Grey italics show residues not defined in
the structure. Residues aligned (−) or defining the common core of
humanCRT and ratCNX (+) are indicated. Residues included in the
conserved clusters 1 and 2 are labeled 1 (green) and 2 (red),
respectively.
Results and Discussion
Designing a CRT fragment suitable for X-ray crystallography
Due to their flexible nature, the P-domain and the C-terminal extension of CRT
were expected to preclude crystallization of the full-length protein. We
therefore designed a truncated protein in which the P-domain was replaced by a
GSG linker and the C-terminal residues 369–417 were deleted (Figure 1A). The P-domain
boundaries were deduced from the X-ray structure of CNX and the NMR structure of
the ratCRT P-domain [10], [11]. These domain limits (residues 204–302)
slightly differ from those currently found in sequence databases (residues
197–308) (Figure 1A).
The size of the C-terminal deletion was more difficult to predict. Several
constructs were produced, and the fragment ending at Lys368 gave the best
results in terms of crystallization. A similar construct, with the same
C-terminal end, was used to solve the X-ray structure of the mouseCRT lectin
domain [9].In keeping with previous observations [12], monomeric CRT coexisted
with higher molecular weight forms after the affinity purification step, and
these were removed by gel filtration chromatography (see Methods). Mass
spectrometry analysis of the purified material yielded a value of 32,201 Da
(predicted mass: 32,202 Da). The thermal stability of the recombinant domain was
determined using a thermofluor assay [13], yielding a relatively
low Tm value (40°C), consistent with other analyses [9], [14]. As this domain contains a
Ca2+-binding site, calcium was used throughout the
purification process. Crystallization of this fragment proved to be successful
(see Methods), allowing crystallographic analyses.
High-resolution structure of the human CRT globular domain
The structure of the humanCRT globular domain (Figure 1B) was solved at a resolution of 1.55
Å and refined to R
work and
R
free values of 0.176 and 0.190, respectively
(Table 1). At such a
resolution, most of the residues are very clearly defined. Only residues
203–204 and 302–303, on either side of the linker, and the
C-terminal Leu-Lys residues were not clearly seen in the electron density. The
two crystal forms obtained at different pH (8.5–9.0 and 5.7–7.0)
yielded similar structures, except for their N-terminal extension.
Table 1
Data collection and refinement statistics.
1st crystal form
2nd crystal form
PDB code
3POS
3POW
Data collection
ESRF Beamline
Id29
Id23-eh2
Space group
P212121
P212121
Cell (a, b, c) Å
42.2, 91.1, 194.0
42.9, 70.4, 91.8
Resolution range high/low (Å)
1.65–20
1.55–10.0
Last resolution shell high/low (Å)
1.65–1.7
1.55–1.59
Observed reflections a
1416077 (20909)
187458 (14576)
Unique reflectionsa
88382 (6434)
39833 (3013)
Redundancya
16 (3.2)
4.7 (4.8)
Completeness (%)a
96.8 (83.0)
96.8 (99.9)
I/SigIa
18.8 (2.4)
15.2 (3.0)
Rsym (%)a
11.7 (45.4)
7.0 (53.5)
Refinement
Resolution range high/low Å
1.65–19.9
1.55–10.0
Last resolution shell high/low (Å)
1.65–1.69
1.55–1.59
Rwork/Rfree (%)a,b
17.0/20.7 (21.2/22.2)
17.6/19.0 (24.4/26.2)
R.m.s.d. Bound/Angle (Å/°)
0.01/1.07
0.009/1.16
Mean B factor (Å2)
19.3
16.8
Values in parentheses are for outermost shell.
5% of the structure factors were isolated to monitor
Rfree.
Values in parentheses are for outermost shell.5% of the structure factors were isolated to monitor
Rfree.Like its counterparts in CNX and mouseCRT, the humanCRT globular domain
exhibits a jelly-roll fold assembled from two anti-parallel ß-sheets, one
convex and one concave. Remarkably, the C domain inserts into the globular
domain, providing the central strands ß19 and ß20 of the
ß-sandwich structure (Figure
1B). The long C-terminal α3 helix is kinked at Thr346. Subtle
differences in this kink orientation induce a 1.5 Å displacement at the
end of α3 between different molecules of the first crystal form.
Interestingly, the free Cys163, mutated to Ser in the mouseCRT globular domain,
is not accessible in this conformation, as it is buried between residues from
strands ß7 and ß10. Otherwise, this structure is quite similar to
that of mouseCRT [9], with a r.m.s. deviation of only 0.4 Å based on
242 superposed Cα positions. Likewise, the Ca2+ ion is also
coordinated by 7 ligands contributed by the backbone carbonyls of Gln26, Lys62
and Lys64, two water molecules, and both side-chain carboxyl oxygens of
Asp328.The humanCRT and dogCNX globular domains exhibit an r.m.s. deviation of 1.6
Å based on 213 superimposed Cα positions, this value dropping to 0.77
Å when considering a common core defined by 142 Cα positions (see
Figure 1C). Despite this
overall homology, these two structures differ in certain regions (Figures 1B, 1C). CRT lacks the
N-terminal extension present in CNX, and thus its N- and C-terminal ends lie on
opposite faces of the structure. Compared to CNX, the C-terminal helix of CRT is
prolonged by a large extension (residues 347–366). Two other α-helical
structures, α1 (residues 29–35) and α2 (residues 196–199)
are present in CRT. The loop before strand ß2, and those between ß8
and ß9 are much shorter in CRT. Strand ß9 and the following loop are
slightly different in the two structures. Helix α1 observed in CNX is absent
in humanCRT.
Two surface patches are common to CRT and CNX
Although CRT and CNX have common folds, most of their surface-exposed side chains
are different, with the striking exception of two patches of residues. The most
extended patch is located on the concave ß-sheet surface (Figure 2A). From a functional
standpoint, this first cluster corresponds to the lectin site of CRT and CNX, as
identified by mutagenesis experiments and recently deciphered by the X-ray
structure of the mouseCRT lectin domain complexed to a tetrasaccharide [9]. The most
conserved residues in this patch are Cys105 and Cys137 engaged in a disulfide
bridge and the nearby Gly107; Tyr109, Pro134 and Asp135 in the middle of the
patch; Lys111 and the neighboring residues His145 and Ile147 on the edge. Less
conserved residues Trp319, Met131 and Tyr128 also contribute to the patch. This
cluster includes many charged residues that are mostly buried: Lys111
(>75% buried), Asp135 (>60%), Asp317 (about 80%). The
central Tyr109 is also buried (80%), except for its hydroxyl group that
is always protonated at physiological pH because of its high pKa value
(>12).
Figure 2
Surface patches common to CRT and CNX.
(A) The more extended patch, cluster 1, corresponding to the identified
lectin site [9]. (B) The smaller cluster 2. CRT and CNX
structures are in light blue and green, respectively. Labels correspond
to CRT residues, and red labels indicate the most conserved ones.
Hydrogen bonds are represented by dotted red lines. The two patches are
displayed using stereograms.
Surface patches common to CRT and CNX.
(A) The more extended patch, cluster 1, corresponding to the identified
lectin site [9]. (B) The smaller cluster 2. CRT and CNX
structures are in light blue and green, respectively. Labels correspond
to CRT residues, and red labels indicate the most conserved ones.
Hydrogen bonds are represented by dotted red lines. The two patches are
displayed using stereograms.A second smaller patch of conserved surface residues comprises Asp166 (233 in
CNX), His170 (237), Tyr172 (239), Asp187 (254) and Trp347 (456) (Figure 2B). These side-chains
are superimposed in CRT and CNX despite significant differences in the
conformation of the preceding loop (Figure 2B). In the central Asp/His/Asp triad, the His residue is
wedged in-between the two charged Asp side chains at H-bonding distances (Figure 2B). This atypical
environment had not been described so far. The strong sequence conservation of
these residues (Figures S1, S2) further suggests that they may have
functional implications. In accord with this hypothesis, the His170Ala mutation
was shown to dramatically impair the CRT chaperone function in
vivo
[15]. It was
initially proposed that this effect could be due to a conformational change that
would extend up to the lectin site [15]. However, this site is about 20 Å away from
His170, on the opposite side of the beta-barrel (Figure S3).
How this mutation could alter the lectin site at such a distance is therefore
unclear. The hypothesis of a large conformational change was based in part on
the observation that the His170Ala mutation induces changes in Trp fluorescence
and circular dichroism [15]. However, the circular dichroism spectra of the
wild-type and mutant proteins had similar shapes, and the mutant was produced
in vivo at the same level as the wild-type species [15]. In the X-ray
structure, Trp347 lies in close proximity to Asp187 (3.2 Å, Figure 2B). The His170Ala
mutation is therefore expected to modify the stability and charge of Asp187,
altering in turn the spectral properties of the neighboring Trp347. Therefore,
even a local destabilization of the DHD cluster is likely to alter the Trp
fluorescence and circular dichroism spectrum of CRT. Thus, although this
question warrants further experimental investigation, we believe that this
second patch of residues could also support a functional role, in light of its
striking structural and sequence conservation and in agreement with previous
in vivo data.
A peptide-binding site on the edge of the lectin site
CNX and CRT also act as chaperones on non-glycosylated substrates [3], [16] and the CNX
globular domain has been shown to bind peptides through a hitherto unidentified
site that has been proposed to be distinct from the lectin site [17]. In
this respect, our crystallographic analyses of the humanCRT globular domain
reveal interesting polypeptide-binding properties. The unfolded N-terminal
extension fused to CRT for purification purposes is indeed consistently found to
interact with the edge of the lectin site, and the quality of the electron
density shows that this interaction is specific. To achieve such an interaction,
this extension adopts a wide range of conformations, with some disordered parts,
emphasizing its flexible nature (Figure 3A). No crystal was obtained when the preceding HAT tag was
present. No interaction was observed in the crystal packing between this edge of
the lectin site and properly folded segments of the CRT molecules. Two different
modes of interaction were observed. The first mode involves H-bonding between
Asp135 and the hydroxyl group and peptide bond nitrogen of Ser13. Three such
interactions were observed in the first crystal form (Figure 3B). A distinct interaction mode,
involving an ionic bond between Asp317 and Arg17, was observed in the second
crystal form (Figure 3C).
Interestingly, inspection of the carbohydrate-free crystal form (pdb code 3O0V)
obtained by Kozlov et al (2010) also reveals an interaction
between the N-terminal Gly-Ser-Met extension and the edge of the lectin site.
Moreover, Ser16 and Met17 of the mouseCRT construct are strikingly superposed
to the corresponding residues Ser13 and Arg17 of our humanCRT construct, as
observed in the first and second crystal forms, respectively (Figure 3D). Altogether, these
independent observations convincingly map a peptide-binding site comprising
Phe74, Trp319, Cys105, Cys137, and Asp135 (Figures 3 and S3). This
site mainly contributes hydrophobic contacts, except for the polar interactions
described above. Phe46, at the bottom of the Met17 binding pocket, also
contributes to the hydrophobic environment. Additional contacts provided by
Met131, Asp317 (Figure 3B),
Gly106 (Figure 3C), or
Gly124 (Figure 3D) are also
observed but seem secondary to the main interaction site. Thus, we may have
identified two sub-sites of the hitherto unknown peptide-binding site of CRT.
This site overlaps the carbohydrate-binding site of the homologous mouseCRT
lectin domain recently identified by X-ray analysis [9], suggesting that different
types of ligands can bind to the edge of the lectin site. This would explain why
Trp319, involved in all the peptide-binding interactions depicted here, was
shown to be essential to the CRT in vivo chaperone activity and
to its in vitro ability to prevent thermal aggregation of MDH,
a non glycosylated substrate [18]. The same effect was also true, to a lesser extent,
for the Cys105–Cys137disulfide bond [18], which is also at the edge
of this common carbohydrate/peptide-binding area. On the other hand, several
mutations have been shown to suppress the lectin activity of CRT or CNX without
affecting other carbohydrate-independent functions, such as suppression of the
aggregation of thermally denatured non-glycosylated proteins [17], [19],
in vitro peptide-binding [17], and chaperoning of
class I histocompatibility molecules [20]. These mutations map a
particular area of the lectin domain, the one that specifically recognizes the
glucose unit (Figure S3). The corresponding residues include Y109, K111, Y128 and
D317 of CRT [19], [20], as well as Y166, M169, I184 of CNX, which are
homologous to Y128, M131 and I147 in CRT [17]. Interestingly, these
residues are located on the side opposite to the peptide-binding site described
above (Figure
S3), and their mutations into alanine will not affect the
peptide-binding property. Thus, even though the proposed peptide-binding site
lies on the edge of the lectin site, in an area where carbohydrate-binding also
occurs, this location is fully compatible with previous mutagenesis data.
Figure 3
The N-terminal extension of CRT interacts with the edge of the lectin
site.
(A) Superposed views of the N-terminal extensions. (B) The interaction
mode observed in the first crystal form. (C) The interaction mode
observed in the second crystal form. (D) Superposition of the
interacting regions of human CRT and the corresponding region of mouse
CRT. Labels correspond to interacting residues of human CRT in (B) and
(C), and to mouse CRT in (D). Hydrogen bonds and ionic interactions are
represented by dotted red lines. The blue dotted lines in (A) represent
disordered parts. F1, F2: crystal forms 1 and 2; m: mouse CRT. All items
are displayed as stereograms.
The N-terminal extension of CRT interacts with the edge of the lectin
site.
(A) Superposed views of the N-terminal extensions. (B) The interaction
mode observed in the first crystal form. (C) The interaction mode
observed in the second crystal form. (D) Superposition of the
interacting regions of humanCRT and the corresponding region of mouseCRT. Labels correspond to interacting residues of humanCRT in (B) and
(C), and to mouseCRT in (D). Hydrogen bonds and ionic interactions are
represented by dotted red lines. The blue dotted lines in (A) represent
disordered parts. F1, F2: crystal forms 1 and 2; m: mouseCRT. All items
are displayed as stereograms.
An intriguing CRT molecular zipper
Most of the residues in the proposed peptide-binding site are common to the CRT
and CNX families, but Phe74 is specific to CRT. It is conserved in most of the
CRT sequences, except for a group of plant CRTs (Figure S4).
Intriguingly, the preceding CRT-specific 69–73 SQDAR segment largely
contributes to a crystal packing interaction omnipresent in the crystal forms
obtained so far. Ionic bonds between Asp71 and Arg162, and between Arg73 and
Glu167 are central to this interaction. These are complemented by hydrophobic
contacts between Val50 and Pro139, and by H-bonding interactions bridging the
main-chain atoms of Ser69 and Asp71 to the tip of Lys142 and Asp165 side-chains,
respectively. These mainly polar interactions thus represent the most favorable
CRT/CRT interface, at least in the crystalline state, since they have been
observed three times in the first crystal form, and once in the second form. We
have also checked that these interactions occur consistently in the crystal
packing of the mouseCRT lectin domain (pdb codes 3O0V, 3O0W, 3O0X), thus
providing four additional observations. Finally, these interactions are observed
over a wide range of pH (5.5–9.0), whereas the interactions mediated by
the nearby His42 and His123 change polarity in this pH range, thus giving rise
to two different crystal forms in our study.Further analysis of this set of conserved interactions reveals intriguing
properties. First, a molecular zipper is formed when these interactions are
applied on both sides of the CRT domain (residues 71–73 and 162–167)
(Figure 4A). It is
composed of two lines of molecules with inverted orientations, one with the
ligand-binding site up, the other down (Figure 4A), the long C-terminal helices
providing both a flat basis and a flap (Figure 4C). Linear assemblies of CRT
molecules are also seen on electron micrographs (Figure 4B). A close inspection of the area of
the peptide-binding site reveals that it is next to a cavity formed by the 3
neighboring molecules (Figure
4D). Moreover, Trp319 comes across this cavity in relative proximity
(10 Å) to the Asp-His-Asp triad of the neighboring molecule (Figure 4E), despite the fact
that these elements lie on opposite sides of the same CRT molecule (Figure S3).
Given that both His170 and Trp319 were shown to be essential for the in
vivo chaperone activity of CRT [15], [18], this raises the intriguing
question of a possible functional relevance of such a proximity. In addition,
fully or partially exposed hydrophobic side-chains line the cavity in this area
(Figure 4E), which
further suggests that this may complement the above-described site for the
binding of unfolded peptides. The cavity may complement as well the lectin site,
introducing binding properties specific to CRT and distinct from those of CNX.
Finally, it should be stressed that this set of interactions can likely be also
achieved in full-length CRT, the C-terminal extension and the P-domain being
located on two lateral sides of the array of molecules (Figures 4C, 4D).
Figure 4
The CRT molecular zipper.
(A) Schematic representation of the zipper. A red circle indicates the
position of the binding site. Small circles locate the relative position
of the SQDAR segment (pink) and its interacting residues in the
neighboring molecule (yellow). The C-terminal helices are drawn in dark
blue. (B) Negative-staining electron micrograph of the CRT construct.
(C, D) Two orthogonal side- and top-views (the latter framed in A) of
the interactions between CRT molecules defining the molecular zipper as
seen in the crystal lattice. Residues involved in hydrogen and ionic
bonds are shown in pink (segment SQDAR) and yellow. P marks the
insertion position of the missing P domain. (E) Detailed view of the
pocket lining the binding site as framed in (D). Exposed hydrophobic
residues lining the pocket are in yellow; charged residues exposing a
large hydrophobic surface (>65 Å2), forming a
secondary shell, are in pale green; Residues shown by mutation to be
essential for the chaperone function of CRT are in red (W319) and orange
(H170).
The CRT molecular zipper.
(A) Schematic representation of the zipper. A red circle indicates the
position of the binding site. Small circles locate the relative position
of the SQDAR segment (pink) and its interacting residues in the
neighboring molecule (yellow). The C-terminal helices are drawn in dark
blue. (B) Negative-staining electron micrograph of the CRT construct.
(C, D) Two orthogonal side- and top-views (the latter framed in A) of
the interactions between CRT molecules defining the molecular zipper as
seen in the crystal lattice. Residues involved in hydrogen and ionic
bonds are shown in pink (segment SQDAR) and yellow. P marks the
insertion position of the missing P domain. (E) Detailed view of the
pocket lining the binding site as framed in (D). Exposed hydrophobic
residues lining the pocket are in yellow; charged residues exposing a
large hydrophobic surface (>65 Å2), forming a
secondary shell, are in pale green; Residues shown by mutation to be
essential for the chaperone function of CRT are in red (W319) and orange
(H170).
Conclusion
This high-resolution structure of the globular domain of humanCRT provides a
very accurate model for future investigations. Similar domain limits are
observed for the human and mouseCRT globular domains [9], which both include the
18–202 segment from the N domain and the 303–366 segment from the C
domain. Consistent structural domain limits must be used when dissecting CRT to
locate functional units and binding sites. Moreover, several independent
serendipitous observations lead to the first description of unfolded protein
segments bound to CRT, on the outer edge of the lectin site. Further
investigations of the binding specificity of this area might be possible by
specifically designing the sequence of the N-terminal extension of CRT. On the
edge of this peptide-binding site, the SQDAR segment, which is specifically
found in CRT sequences, exhibits a strong propensity for interaction, at least
with other CRT molecules. This raises the possibility for CRT to generate larger
peptide-binding platforms. The molecular zipper formed in the crystals through
the SQDAR-mediated interactions looks biologically relevant in several ways,
especially if one considers that CRT is often associated to membrane surfaces, a
situation that possibly stabilizes such elongated, thin and flat oligomers. As
such, these observations provide a structural basis to reconsider in part the
chaperone and other CRT functions as multi-molecular processes.
Materials and Methods
Protein expression and purification
All expression plasmids were derived from plasmid pHFX-CRT, containing the cDNA
encoding full-length humanCRT (MRC Gene Service, Cambridge, UK) fused at its
N-terminus to an HAT tag followed by a factor X cleavage site. The P-domain
(residues 204–302) was replaced by a GSG linker, as described elsewhere
[21],
and truncation of the C-terminal segment after residue 368 was obtained using
the primer 5′-GGACAAACAGGACGAGGAGCAGAGGCTTAAGTAGTAAGCTTGCGGCCGCACTCGAGC-3′
and reverse. Transformed Rosetta 2(DE3) cells (Novagen) were optimally grown at
37°C and protein production was induced by 0.1 mM IPTG for 16–20 h at
20°C. Cells were lysed in 20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.3 M NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2,
10 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, using the FAST Prep matrix (MP Biomedicals).
Purification was performed in the same buffer by affinity chromatography on a
Ni2+-Sepharose resin (HiTrap™, Amersham). Fractions
containing the CRT domain were further purified on a S75 16/60 prep grade gel
filtration column (GE/Amersham). Fractions containing pure monomeric CRT, as
checked by non-denaturing SDS-PAGE, were concentrated to 12 mg/mL. Control of
the sample thermostability was performed at the EMBL htxlab facility using
thermal-shift assays.
Crystallization
Initial crystallization conditions were determined using the EMBL htxlab facility
and commercial screens (QIAGEN), allowing generation of needle-like crystals.
Optimal conditions were reproduced manually using the vapor diffusion method, at
4°C. Crystal form I was obtained using a reservoir solution containing
30% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4000, 0.1–0.2 M sodium acetate, 0.1 M
Tris-HCl, pH 8.5 or 9.0. Crystal form II was obtained using 30% PEG 4000,
0.2 M ammonium acetate, 10 mM magnesium acetate, and either 0.05 M MES, pH 5.7
or 6.0, or 0.05 M HEPES, pH 7.0.
X-ray structure determination
The initial best diffracting crystal had a long needle-like shape (>250
µm) that allowed us to translate it to record several data sets at
different exposure times. Data processing and scaling were performed using XDS
[22]. The
three most coherent data sets could be merged to obtain a highly accurate and
redundant unique data set at 1.7 Å resolution. Data collection statistics
are listed in Table 1. In
this first crystal form, the space group is
P212121, with cell dimensions
a = 42.4 Å, b = 91.5 Å,
c = 194.8 Å. The solvent content is about 40%,
and the asymmetric unit contains 3 molecules. The structure was solved by
iterative molecular replacements. The core structure comprising the main
secondary structure elements of the CNX lectin domain [10] was used as a starting
search model. After careful inspection of the electron density, a smaller search
model was defined, restricted to the 130 best fitting residues. The correct
molecular replacement solution was obtained using this second search model on
the CaspR website (www.igs.cnrs-mrs.fr/Caspr2/index). Although the initial R-factor
was high after the AMORE step [23], it dropped to 0.45 after 200 minimization steps
using CNS refinement [24] at 3 Å resolution. That this solution was valid
was confirmed by the observation of several residue substitutions in the
electron density map, convergence of the CNS refinement minimizations steps
using non-crystallographic restraints at 1.6 Å resolution, and improved
iterative automatic reconstruction of this model using the ARP/wARP procedure
[25].
Iterative reconstruction of the model was carried out using O [26], CNS, and
the ARP/wARP procedure until recovery of most of the residues. Standard
iterative rounds of manual building and refinement steps were finally carried
out using BUSTER and Coot [27], [28].Crystal form II diffracted to 1.55 Å. The space group is
P212121, with cell dimensions
a = 42.9 Å, b = 70.4 Å,
c = 91.8 Å. The solvent content is about 45%,
with a single molecule per asymmetric unit. The structure was easily solved
using the Phaser molecular replacement software [29], using the structure of one
molecule of crystal form I as a search model.
Structure analysis
Two clusters of conserved surface residues were initially identified by visual
inspection of the superimposed CNX and CRT structures. Comparison of the crystal
contacts in the two crystal forms obtained in this study also revealed a CRT
segment that is involved in the same crystal packing interactions.The sequence conservation of the residues belonging to these particular clusters
and segment was then carefully analyzed. For this purpose, several redundant
tools have been used to analyze the degree of sequence conservation in the
CRT/CNX family: CONSURF [30] and several other multiple sequence alignments
generated on the PipeAlign website ([31], http://igbmc.u-strasbg.fr/PipeAlign) were used. Buried acidic
and basic groups have long been known to be more particularly present at
functionally important sites. Detection of such buried charged residues and
prediction of their pKa value was performed using the ProPKA web server
(http://propka.ki.ku.dk) [32].Sequence alignments of surface residues of cluster 2. This
sequence alignment shows how the residues displayed in Figure 2B (highlighted in yellow) are
strongly conserved in the CRT/CNX sequence family. More detailed information
about the sequence names is provided in Figure
S2.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.Description of the set of sequences of the CRT/CNX family. The
following information about the sequence names is indicated: main protein
name (when defined), source and alignment score of the whole sequence to the
human globular domain sequence. The sequences have been automatically
assigned to several groups using the pipealign procedure [30]. In the
alignments, the sequence names directly coming from the Swissprot database
have the SW prefix; the other protein sequences, translated from the gene,
have the SPT prefix.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.Relative locations of the glucose-binding site, the peptide-binding
site, cluster 2 and the main mutations affecting the
chaperone
properties. A. Zoom on the lectin site. B. The lectin site and
cluster 2 are located on two opposite sides of the beta-barrel. Mutations
affecting only the lectin activity, which line the glucose-binding site
(GBS) are colored magenta in A and green in B. The proposed peptide-binding
site is colored orange in A, red and yellow in B. The red and orange
residues in B highlight the mutations affecting the in vivo
chaperone properties.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.Sequence alignments of the SQDAR 69–73 segment. This
sequence alignment shows how the residues highlighted in yellow are well
conserved in the CRT groups 1 and 2; less conserved in groups 3 and 4; and
not conserved in the group 5. The following F74 (green) is found in most of
the CRT-like sequences, except for the plant group 4. It is not present in
the CNX-like group 5 sequences. Details corresponding to the sequence names
are given in Figure S2.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: A T Brünger; P D Adams; G M Clore; W L DeLano; P Gros; R W Grosse-Kunstleve; J S Jiang; J Kuszewski; M Nilges; N S Pannu; R J Read; L M Rice; T Simonson; G L Warren Journal: Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr Date: 1998-09-01
Authors: Breanna S Ireland; Ulf Brockmeier; Christopher M Howe; Tim Elliott; David B Williams Journal: Mol Biol Cell Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 4.138
Authors: C A Ogden; A deCathelineau; P R Hoffmann; D Bratton; B Ghebrehiwet; V A Fadok; P M Henson Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2001-09-17 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read Journal: J Appl Crystallogr Date: 2007-07-13 Impact factor: 3.304
Authors: Ronnie Lum; Samar Ahmad; Seo Jung Hong; Daniel C Chapman; Guennadi Kozlov; David B Williams Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Sanjeeva Joseph Wijeyesakere; Jessica K Gagnon; Karunesh Arora; Charles L Brooks; Malini Raghavan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 11.205