Literature DB >> 21423218

Genomic evolution in Barrett's adenocarcinoma cells: critical roles of elevated hsRAD51, homologous recombination and Alu sequences in the genome.

J Pal1, R Bertheau, L Buon, A Qazi, R B Batchu, S Bandyopadhyay, R Ali-Fehmi, D G Beer, D W Weaver, R J Shmookler Reis, R K Goyal, Q Huang, N C Munshi, M A Shammas.   

Abstract

A prominent feature of most cancers including Barrett's adenocarcinoma (BAC) is genetic instability, which is associated with development and progression of disease. In this study, we investigated the role of recombinase (hsRAD51), a key component of homologous recombination (HR)/repair, in evolving genomic changes and growth of BAC cells. We show that the expression of RAD51 is elevated in BAC cell lines and tissue specimens, relative to normal cells. HR activity is also elevated and significantly correlates with RAD51 expression in BAC cells. The suppression of RAD51 expression, by short hairpin RNA (shRNA) specifically targeting this gene, significantly prevented BAC cells from acquiring genomic changes to either copy number or heterozygosity (P<0.02) in several independent experiments employing single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays. The reduction in copy-number changes, following shRNA treatment, was confirmed by Comparative Genome Hybridization analyses of the same DNA samples. Moreover, the chromosomal distributions of mutations correlated strongly with frequencies and locations of Alu interspersed repetitive elements on individual chromosomes. We conclude that the hsRAD51 protein level is systematically elevated in BAC, contributes significantly to genomic evolution during serial propagation of these cells and correlates with disease progression. Alu sequences may serve as substrates for elevated HR during cell proliferation in vitro, as they have been reported to do during the evolution of species, and thus may provide additional targets for prevention or treatment of this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21423218      PMCID: PMC3406293          DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


Introduction

Carcinogenesis is understood to be a complex and stepwise process (Farber, 1984) in which a normal cell undergoes a variety of genetic alterations and acquires a set of unique characteristics that enable it to progress from normal to benign-cancer and then to malignant phenotypes. Ongoing and evolving genomic changes progressively lead to development of more aggressive and drug-resistant states. The genomes of normal diploid cells are quite stable, whereas genetic alterations at both the nucleotide-sequence and chromosomal-rearrangement levels are frequently seen in cancer (Pathak ; Lengauer , 1998). The types of abnormalities observed at diagnosis continue to accumulate with progression of disease (Lengauer ), indicating a striking and ongoing genomic evolution. The evaluation of genomic changes in premalignant polyp and sporadic colorectal cancer cells has indicated that genetic instability is probably a cause rather than a consequence of oncogenic transformation (Stoler ). Ongoing genomic evolution not only enables cancer cells to progress to more malignant stages of disease but also makes both diagnosis and treatment challenging tasks (Ye ). Most human cancers show multiple mutations, arising as independent events (Neiman and Hartwell, 1991), frequently observed in genes, such as c-myc, APC, c-K-ras, DCC, MCC, p53, Rad51, BRCA1, BRCA2 and related genes. For example, gastric cancer is commonly associated with mutations in c-K-ras (Miki ), APC (Horii ) and p53 (Yamada ), whereas hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is known to feature mutations in DNA mismatch-repair genes, such as hMLH1, hPMS1, hMSH2 and hMSH6 (Lynch and Lynch, 1998; Lynch ). Development of colorectal carcinoma (Tsancheva, 1997) appears to require the accrual of seven or more such mutations. Progression from a benign tumor to colorectal cancer may require as long as two decades, whereas further progression to metastasis can occur in <2 more years (Jones ). According to a recent report, changes in up to 20 genes are required for oncogenic transformation of a normal cell (Beerenwinkel ). With availability of new genome-wide analytical tools, it is now becoming obvious that genomic evolution in cancer cells is more widespread than previously thought. For example, it has been accepted for many years that chronic lymphocytic leukemia is associated with specific molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities, and genomic changes in this cancer do not often evolve during the course of disease. However, Stilgenbauer recently demonstrated that a subgroup of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients displays an ongoing genomic instability, associated with poor clinical outcome and shorter survival of these patients. Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma is a cancer associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease. The cancer develops gradually and progressively from specialized intestinal metaplasia of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) (Spechler and Goyal, 1986), a pre-malignant lesion, and passes through stages of low-grade to highgrade dysplasia, before finally emerging as adenocarcinoma (Spechler and Goyal, 1986). Data from a number of laboratories indicate that genetic instability arises early, at the BE stage, and gradually intensifies—leading to a series of genomic changes, some of which underlie progression through successive stages of dysplasia. Rabinovitch et al. evaluating specimens of Barrett’s adenocarcinoma (BAC) for DNA amounts, proposed in 1989 that aneuploidy caused by genetic instability in a subset of cells is associated with progression of BE to adenocarcinoma. Finley using probes against centromeres and specific regions of chromosomes 9, 11 and 17, demonstrated that chromosomal instability arises early in the etiology of BE. Consistent with these observations, genome-wide analyses of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) also identified multiple alterations in a majority of both the BE and BAC specimens examined (Akagi ). Changes in length of short repetitive DNA sites, indicative of microsatellite instability, as well as loss of heterozygosity (LOH), have also been reported in all stages of BAC including pre-malignant BE (Cai ). A comprehensive study, utilizing image cytometry to evaluate DNA content in a large number of specimens of normal esophagi and various stages of BAC, indicated that aneuploidy is detected in a subset of BE specimens, and increases in frequency and severity from BE to low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and then to BAC. Evaluation of the genome by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) indicated that relatively large deletions and amplifications were rare in early stages of disease but more frequent and spanned larger chromosomal regions in high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma (Croft ; Paulson ). It is therefore clear that genomic instability arises early in BAC and increases over time, leading to accumulation of mutations and accompanied by progression of disease. Some of the mutations occurring in early stages of BAC affect antioncogenes, such as p16 and p53 (Koppert ). Mechanisms of genomic instability in cancer are not fully understood, and identification of these mechanisms could furnish novel targets for cancer prevention and treatment. It has been shown that tumorigenicity of cancer cell lines correlates with their karyotypic instability (Gee and Harris, 1979), suggesting that genomic rearrangements may have an important role in the development and/or progression of cancer. Although genetic recombination has been implicated in diverse aspects of maintaining the cell’s genetic integrity, including DNA repair (Resnick ) and proper segregation of chromosomes in meiosis (Baker ), aberrant or deregulated recombination activity can mediate genomic rearrangements and is likely involved in LOH (Honma ), gene amplification (Windle ) and chromosomal translocation (Cheng ; Honma ; Shammas ) and therefore is a presumed mechanism for both oncogene activation and the LOH that inactivates the second copy of a mutated antioncogene. Consistent with this, recombination activity is altered by a variety of chemicals, carcinogens, radiation and oncogenic viruses (Rodarte-Ramon, 1972; Radman ; Sengstag, 1994; Galli and Schiestl, 1995; Cheng ; Li ). Homologous recombination (HR) depends on extensive sequence homology between participating DNA molecules and is an important repair mechanism, which has a vital role in maintaining genomic integrity of a cell. Impairment or deregulation of HR can also be deleterious because it has the potential to cause unnecessary and ongoing genomic rearrangements. We have shown that HR activity is constitutively elevated in multiple myeloma and mediates genomic instability and development of drug resistance in myeloma cells (Shammas ). Repetitive sequences in the genome, such as Alu, which provide abundant, interspersed substrates for the HR machinery, may adversely affect the consequences of an overactive recombination pathway. The purpose of this study was to study genomic evolution in BAC cells and elucidate the roles of recombinase (hsRAD51), HR activity and repetitive DNA sequences in the genome. We show that recombinase (RAD51) expression is markedly elevated in BAC cell lines and tissue specimens, relative to normal cells. HR activity, as assessed by a plasmid-based assay, is also significantly elevated in BAC cells. Both RAD51 and HR are further upregulated by exposure of BAC cells to a carcinogen, known to be recombinogenic. Genome-wide analyses by both SNP (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and CGH (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) arrays show that the suppression of RAD51 consistently reduces HR and significantly prevents the genomic evolution observed in BAC cells, in multiple independent experiments. We also show that mutational frequencies correlate well with Alu frequencies and their locations on individual chromosomes.

Results

Recombinase (hsRAD51) is overexpressed in Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines and tissue specimens

We analyzed RAD51 protein expression in BAC and other cancer cell lines, human BAC tissue specimens, and corresponding normal cells, using western blot and immunohistochemical analyses. RAD51 expression was near background level in normal fibroblasts, and very low or absent in normal human esophageal epithelial cells (HEEC), but was elevated 3.5- to 6-fold in two BAC cell lines, FLO-1 and OE33, relative to HEEC levels (Figures 1a and b). Treatment of FLO-1 cells with a known carcinogen and recombinogen, nickel chloride (Li ; Shammas ), led to a further twofold induction of RAD51 expression. To evaluate levels of RAD51 in tissue specimens, sections of paraffin-embedded BE and BAC tissues (from the Tissue Core at the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA) were deparaffinized, blocked, and incubated with mouse monoclonal antibody against RAD51. The samples were then treated with a fluorescence- or horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody. Both immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical analyses indicated that RAD51 protein was either low or absent in four normal tissue sections of primary esophageal epithelium, but highly expressed in five of six BAC specimens tested (Figures 1c and d).
Figure 1

Recombinase (hsRAD51) is overexpressed in Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma (BAC) cell lines and tissue specimens. (a) RAD51 protein expression was analyzed by western blotting in normal human fibroblasts (FIBS), normal primary HEEC, BEAC cell lines (FLO-1, OE33), FLO-1 treated with recombinogen nickel chloride (0.6 mg/ml) for 3 h, normal human colonic smooth muscle cells (HCSMCs) and colonic adenocarcinoma cell lines (SW480, SW620, HCT116). (b) Bar graph showing fold elevation in RAD51 in the adenocarcinoma cell lines of panel (a), relative to control cells. (c) RAD51 immunostaining within BEAC, vs normal tissue. Sections of paraffin-embedded BAC tissues were deparaffinized and treated with anti-RAD51 mouse monoclonal antibody. The samples were then treated with Alexa-Fluor 488-labeled goat anti-mouse secondary antibody and viewed under a fluorescence microscope. The pictures show fluorescence merged with transmitted-light images. (d) Table showing relative expression of RAD51 in all human tissue specimens examined, including those of panel (c). BE, Barrett’s esophagus; BAC Barrett’s adenocarcinoma. A full colour version of this figure is available at the Oncogene journal online.

HR activity is elevated in Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma cells, concordant with RAD51 expression

Using a plasmid-based assay, we have shown that HR activity is significantly elevated in hematologic cancer cells (Shammas ). For this study, we used an improved HR substrate plasmid in which HR generates a functional firefly luciferase gene, Fluc, while Gaussia luciferase (Gluc) serves as an internal standard, which remains unaffected by HR. The plasmid is introduced into test cells, which are harvested after appropriate incubation, and HR is assessed by the ratio of FLuc to GLuc luciferase activities. Assessment of HR in various cell lines with the new substrate plasmid was consistent with our previously used plasmid substrate, R=0.993 (not shown). Consistent with recombinase protein assays, HR activity was near background level in two human diploid fibroblast strains, low in normal primary HEEC, but elevated 11-, 9- and 15- fold in OE33, FLO-1 and SW480 cells relative to normal fibroblasts (Figure 2a). Moreover, treatment of cells with nickel chloride, which induced the expression of recombinase protein in FLO-1 cells (Figures 1a and b), also led to a further twofold induction of HR activity in these cells (Figure 2a).
Figure 2

HR activity is constitutively elevated in BEAC cells and correlates with RAD51 expression. (a) HR activity was assessed in normal diploid fibroblasts, primary HEECs (ScienCell), BEAC cell lines (OE33, FLO-1), FLO-1 treated with a known recombinogen, nickel chloride (0.6 mg/ml) for 3 h, and colonic adenocarcinoma cell line SW480, using a plasmid-based assay as described in Materials and methods section. Error bars represent s.e.m. of triplicate assays. (b) Correlation between HR activity and RAD51 expression levels was assessed using the data presented in Figures 1b and 2a. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of 0.84 (P=0.009) for linear regression (panel I) and a Spearman coefficient, rs, of 0.94 (P=0.016) for rank-order regression (panel II) is shown. (c) Normal fibroblasts were transfected with HR substrate plasmid and exposed for 10 min to either bile (sodium glycochenodeoxycholate, 200 μM) or acid (by adjusting the pH of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) to 4 with HCl). Cells were washed twice with regular growth medium (RGM) and incubated in RGM for further 36 h at 37 °C, and evaluated for HR.

HR activity in various normal and BAC cells tested was highly concordant with the expression of RAD51 (Figure 2b), with a Pearson correlation coefficient (R) of 0.84 (P=0.009) for linear regression (Figure 4b, panel I), and a Spearman coefficient, R, of 0.94 (P=0.016) for rank-order regression (panel II).
Figure 4

Suppression of RAD51 prevents the acquisition of copy-number changes in BEAC cells. BEAC (FLO-1 and OE33) cells were transduced with lentivirus particles producing either control CS or RAD51-specific RS shRNAs. For each cell line, just before transduction, an aliquot of cells was harvested and stored at −150 °C to be used as baseline reference ‘B’. Transduced cells were allowed to recover, selected in puromycin for 3 days, and continued in cultured. Cells were harvested at various intervals, genomic DNA from these and baseline reference cells isolated, and evaluated for copy-number changes using 500K or 6.0 SNP arrays (Affymetrix) and software dChip (Kolomietz ; Graves, 2004; Steinemann and Steinemann, 2005), as described in Materials and methods section. SNP hybridization intensities of baseline (day 0) cells were used to define the copy-number baseline, departures from which identified changes in transduced cells. A mutational event was then defined as a detectable change in copy number, in three or more consecutive SNPs. (a) Impact of RAD51 suppression on acquisition of copy-number changes in FLO-1 cells: panel (I) figure showing relative copy numbers in a region of chromosome 22, in baseline ‘B’ cells and those which were transduced with control CS or RAD51-specific RS shRNAs and cultured and harvested at two different time points, that is, day 14 or day 30. Color scale at the bottom shows relative copy numbers. Panel (II): for the experiment in panel (a), the number of copy-change events (that is, detectable change in three or more consecutive SNPs) detected throughout the genome, in transduced relative to baseline cells, is presented. Panel (III): bar graph shows prevention of copy-number changes in RAD51-suppressed RS cells, in four independent experiments; error bars represent s.e.m. CNCEs in transduced (CS and RS cells) relative to baseline cells are presented as percent of control shRNA-transduced CS cells. Panel (IV): line graph showing growth rates of control and RAD51-suppressed cells. (b) Impact of RAD51 suppression on acquisition of copy-number changes in OE33 cells: panel (I): OE33 cells were transduced with CS or RS shRNAs, cultured for 25 days and genomic changes evaluated. Relative copy numbers in chromosome 11 are shown as example. The color scale at the bottom shows relative copy numbers. Panel (II): for the experiment shown in panel (I), copy change events (that is, detectable change in three or more consecutive SNPs) detected throughout the genome, in treated relative to baseline cells, are presented as percent of control shRNA-treated CS cells. A full colour version of this figure is available at the Oncogene journal online.

As BAC is associated with acid reflux, we assessed whether HR in normal cells is affected by short-term exposure to acid or bile. Normal fibroblasts (described above) were transfected with HR substrate plasmid and exposed for 10 min to either bile (sodium glycochenodeoxycholate, 200 μM) or acid (by adjusting the pH of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium to 4 with HCl). Cells were washed twice with regular growth medium and incubated in regular growth medium for further 36 h at 37 °C, and evaluated for HR. Although short-term exposure to bile led to only 1.4-fold induction of HR, the exposure to acid caused a 4-fold induction of HR in normal human cells (P=0.004) (Figure 2c).

Suppression of HsRAD51 in BAC cells and impact on HR and gene expression

To evaluate the role of elevated recombinase and increased HR activity in evolving genomic changes in BAC cells, FLO-1 cells were transduced with lentiviruses, producing either control short hairpin RNA (shRNA) ‘CS’ or HsRAD51-targeting shRNA ‘RS’. Following recovery and selection in puromycin, at day 6 after transduction, the cells were evaluated for gene transcript levels using Human Gene 1.0 ST Arrays (Affymetrix). The color scale in Figure 3a represents percent change in expression of 31 genes associated with HR and genomic instability, in cells treated with RAD51 shRNA ‘RS’ relative to control cells expressing shRNA ‘CS’. Only HsRAD51, of all the HR and genomic-instability genes examined, had expression reduced by ≥40% in R-transduced cells, consistent with direct and specific silencing of the intended target.
Figure 3

Impact of RAD51 suppression on expression profile and HR activity in BAC cells. (a) FLO-1 cells were transduced with lentiviruses, expressing control shRNA CS or RAD51-targeting shRNA RS. Following recovery and selection in puromycin, the cells were evaluated for gene expression, using Human Gene 1.0 ST Arrays. The color scale at the bottom of the figure represents % change in expression of HR and genomic instability associated genes in cells transduced with RAD51 shRNA ‘RS’, relative to control cells transduced with shRNA CS. (b) Panel (I): a representative western blot, showing Rad51 protein in FLO-1 cells transduced with control CS or RAD51 shRNA RS, at day 6 after transduction. Panel (II): bar graph showing relative expression of RAD51 following normalization with β-actin; error bars indicate s.e.m. of four independent experiments, each involving a new transduction. (c) HR activity is reduced in RAD51-suppressed cells. HR activity was assessed at day six after transduction, using a plasmid-based assay as described for Figure 2. Relative HR activity in RAD51-suppressed RS cells is shown as percentage of activity in control shRNA transduced CS cells: error bar indicates s.e.m. of four independent experiments.

In four independent experiments, transduction with RAD51-specific shRNA (RS) was associated with a 47% mean reduction in HsRAD51 protein in FLO-1 cells (P<0.01) (Figure 3b). Commensurate with decreased recombinase expression, HR activity was also reduced by 47% (P=0.001), in four independent experiments, each involving a new lentiviral transduction (Figure 3c).

Suppression of hsRAD51 and HR slows the acquisition of new genomic changes in BAC cells

We showed previously that cancer cell lines with constitutively elevated HR activity acquire new genomic changes over time; suppression of HR in these cells slows the acquisition of genomic changes whereas further induction by recombinogen treatment significantly increased the mutation rate (Shammas ). We have consistently observed that cancer cells with higher HR levels acquire more genomic changes over time than do those with lower HR activity (Shammas and unpublished data). To evaluate the role of elevated hsRAD51 and increased HR in evolving genomic changes in BAC cells, FLO-1 and OE33 cells transduced with control (CS) or RAD51-specific (RS) shRNAs were cultured for varying intervals before harvesting. An aliquot of cells was harvested and frozen at the beginning of each experiment (day 0), providing a baseline control. Accrual of genomic changes, in cells transduced with control vs RAD51 shRNA, was monitored by genome-wide microarray screens for heterozygosity using SNP arrays (Affymetrix), and for copy-number variation using both SNP arrays and CGH arrays (Agilent). Figure 4a shows representative copy-number experiment based on relative signal intensity in SNP arrays probed with genomic DNA fragments. FLO-1 cells, transduced with control (CS) or RAD51 (RS) shRNAs and then maintained by serial subculture, were harvested at two time points: day 14 and day 30. Copy-number changes in cells transduced with CS or RS shRNA, are compared with baseline (B) cells for a region of chromosome 22 (Figure 4a, panel I) and summarized for the entire genome (Figure 4a, panel II). Copy-number change events (CNCEs, where one event is here defined as an observed change in three or more consecutive SNPs) increased over time in cells transduced with control shRNA, but remained constant in RAD51-suppressed cells (Figure 4a). Combining results from four independent experiments, RAD51 suppression reduced the accumulation of CNCE in FLO-1 cells by an average of 70±17%(Figure 4a, panel III). Similar results were obtained with another BAC cell line, OE33, in which RAD51 suppression reduced the time-dependent accrual of CNCE by 62% (Figure 4b). When results are compiled for both BAC lines (FLO-1 and OE33), shRNA suppression of RAD51 reduced the accumulation of genome-wide CNCE by an average of 68±14% (mean±s.d., P<0.0007). To confirm the prevention of copy-number changes following RAD51 suppression in BAC cells, the DNA samples from two independent experiments, which were analyzed by SNP, were also analyzed by CGH using Agilent’s newest high-density (1×1M) CGH arrays. These arrays have more evenly distributed and longer (60-mer) probes, with a median overall spacing of 2.1 kb, and therefore provide better coverage and more accurate measurement of copy-number changes than afforded by SNP arrays (Maciejewski and Mufti, 2008). Figure 5a is a representative array CGH figure showing chromosomes 1, 6 and 19 in ‘CS’ and ‘RS’ cells relative to baseline cells, as an example. Copy-number changes (deletions shown as green and amplifications as red dots) seen frequently in the chromosomes of control shRNA-transduced CS cells, are less frequent in RAD51-suppressed RS cells. Figures 5b and c represent two independent experiments in which DNA samples were analyzed with both the SNP and array CGH analyses. In both experiments, evaluation by CGH showed essentially the same suppression of copy-number changes in RS-treated cells, as were indicated by SNP data (R=0.99). These data confirm that suppression of RAD51 slows the acquisition of copy-number changes in BAC cells.
Figure 5

Prevention of copy-number changes in RAD51-suppressed cells is confirmed by array CGH. To confirm the prevention of copy-number changes following RAD51 suppression in BAC cells, DNA samples from two independent experiments, which were analyzed by SNP arrays, were also analyzed by CGH assay using Agilent’s high density (1M) CGH arrays. (a) Representative CGH figure showing copy-number changes on chromosomes 1, 6 and 19, in control CS and RAD51-suppressed RS cells. With reference to the baseline genome, the amplifications (as red dots) and deletions (as green dots) acquired by CS and RS cells, are shown next to each chromosome. (b) For the experiment shown in panel (a), total numbers of copy-change events identified by SNP and CGH are presented as bar graphs. (c) Copy-change events identified by SNP and CGH in another independent experiment are shown. The number of copy-change events in control CS and RAD51-suppressed RS cells identified by SNP is consistent with those detected by CGH (R=0.99). A full colour version of this figure is available at the Oncogene journal online.

SNP data, analyzed for copy number in Figures 4 and 5, were also evaluated for evidence of LOH. Genotype calls from cells harvested and frozen at the beginning of each experiment (day 0) were used as baselines to identify new LOH loci in control and RAD51-suppressed cells. Figure 6a shows a representative experiment in which FLO-1 cells transduced with control (CS) and RAD51 (RS) shRNAs evaluated for LOH following 33 days of continuous subculture. Suppression of RAD51 in this experiment reduced the total accumulation of LOH by 92% in FLO-1 cells (Figure 6a, panels I and II). Some genomic regions (for example, 1P and 5Q21), previously reported to acquire LOH in esophageal adenocarcinomas (Romagnoli ; van Dekken ) are shown in Figure 6a, panel III. Whereas control (CS) cells indeed accrued LOH in these regions, RAD51-suppressed cells gained far fewer LOH sites. Combined data from four independent experiments indicate that RAD51 suppression reduces the appearance of new LOH loci by 50±15% in FLO-1 cell genomes (Figure 6a, panel IV). Thus, suppression of RAD51 appears to prevent both copy-number and LOH changes in BAC cells.
Figure 6

Suppression of RAD51 prevents acquisition of LOH in BAC cells. SNP data analyzed for copy number (presented in Figures 4 and 5) was also evaluated for LOH. Genotype calls from ‘day 0’ baseline cells were used to define the allele type baseline, departures from which identified new LOH loci in cells transduced with control or Rad51-shRNA cells. If LOH was detected in three or more consecutive SNPs, it was called one LOH event. (a) Impact of RAD51 suppression on acquisition of LOH loci in FLO-1 cells. Panel (I): blue bars show LOH loci acquired in chromosome 19 in one of the four experiments, in cells transduced with control CS or RAD51-shRNA RS and cultured for 33 days. Panel (II): for the experiment of panel (a), the total number of LOH events detected throughout the genome, in transduced relative to baseline cells, is presented as a percentage of control–shRNA-treated CS cells. Panel (III): for the same experiment, LOH loci are shown (indicated by blue bars) in the regions of the genome known to acquire LOH in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Panel (IV): bar graph shows genome-wide incidence of LOH events (that is, detectable change in three or more consecutive SNPs), as a percent of control shRNA-treated cells, in four independent experiments; error bars represent s.e.m. (b) Plasmid DNA is more stable in RAD51-suppressed cells. Control RS and RAD51-suppressed RS cells were transfected with a plasmid carrying Gaussia secretory luciferase and plated at equal cell density, in triplicate dishes. Starting 8 h after transfection, the Gluc activity in the supernatants was measured every 12 h. Gradual loss of Gluc activity in control cells is presented as percent of activity in RAD51-suppressed RS cells. A full colour version of this figure is available at the Oncogene journal online.

The suppression of RAD51, under our experimental condition, did not affect the growth of BAC cells in culture (Figure 4, panel IV).

Plasmid DNA is more stably expressed in RAD51-suppressed cells

We next asked whether transfected plasmid DNA, like genomic DNA, is more stable in RAD51-suppressed (RS) cells than in control-treated cells. RS1 cells, transduced with either CS (control) or RS (RAD51-targeted) shRNAs, were then transfected with identical amounts of plasmid carrying the Gluc gene, encoding Gaussia secretory luciferase. Cells were plated at equal density in triplicate dishes, and beginning 8 h later, Gluc activity was measured in the supernatants at 12-h intervals. In Figure 6b, the gradual loss of Gluc activity in control cells is shown as a fraction of activity in RAD51-suppressed RS cells. Although there was no difference in observed Gluc activity between control and RAD51-suppressed cells at 8 h after transfection, indicating similar transfection efficiency and plasmid input, the relative amount of Gluc activity declined thereafter. This indicates that plasmid DNA continues to be expressed at substantially higher levels in RAD51-suppressed cells than in control cells (P<0.0007). Although the Gluc decline in control cells could reflect either plasmid degradation or silencing (for example, by DNA methylation) or both, these results suggest that suppression of RAD51 in BAC cells may stabilize DNA.

Alu frequency of individual chromosomes significantly correlates with mutational frequency

Alu elements in the human genome comprise a family of conserved short (300-bp) interspersed DNA repeat elements (Economou-Pachnis ; Brookfield, 1994). As they can potentially serve as substrates for overactive HR machinery in cancer cells, we examined whether the frequency of Alu repeats (Alu elements per 106-bp) correlates with the frequency of copy-number variation across the chromosome complement. CGH arrays were used for this analysis, because (unlike SNP arrays) their sequence samples are evenly distributed along the genome. Data from two independent experiments, used for this analysis, produced similar results. Figure 7a (panel I) summarizes data from one such experiment, illustrating the parallel between Alu density (excluding the Y chromosome, as explained below) and the frequency of copy-number changes (R=0.75; P<0.00001) across the genome of FLO-1 cells transduced with control shRNA ‘CS’. A similar correlation between Alu density and copy-number alterations was also observed in a second, independent experiment (R=0.86; not shown). It is noteworthy that Alu frequency and copy-number changes remained correlated in RAD51-suppressed (‘RS’) cells, in which copy-number variation had been markedly reduced. This suggests that Alu repeat elements may be involved in chromosomal rearrangements even in pre-malignant cells, which have far lower levels of chromosomal instability than high-recombination cancer cells.
Figure 7

Mutational frequency of chromosomes correlates with frequency of Alu elements. (a) (I) Data from a representative experiment showing that Alu frequency (excluding the Y chromosome) correlates strongly with copy-number variation. In FLO-1 cells treated with the control CS shRNAs, the correlation coefficient R=0.75 (P<0.00001); and for cells treated with Rad51-targeting RS shRNA. (II) Line plot showing the locations of acquired mutations with reference to Alu element on chromosome Y. The ends of each mutation and ALU frequencies were plotted at their corresponding locations, using the GraphPad Prism software. (b) Line plot showing locations of acquired mutations with reference to Alu elements, on various chromosomes, in another independent experiment. A full colour version of this figure is available at the Oncogene journal online.

Of all the human chromosomes, Y has the lowest overall Alu frequency and has an asymmetric distribution in which Alu elements are largely restricted to half of the chromosome. To indicate locations of mutations with reference to Alu elements in this and other chromosomes, the ends of each mutation and ALU frequencies were plotted along the base pair length on each chromosome. As depicted in Figures 7a (panel II) and 7b, combining data from two independent experiments, copy-number changes on the Y chromosome arose only in the Alu-rich area. The other half of this chromosome, lacking Alu elements, acquired no CNCE in either experiment. Similarly, for the majority of other chromosomes, most mutations arose in Alu-dense regions (Figure 7b). These data indicate a strong association of HR-mediated genomic instability in BAC cells, with areas rich in Alu repetitive DNA elements.

Discussion

We have demonstrated that: (1) recombinase (hsRAD51) is overexpressed in BAC and colon cancer cell lines, and in BAC tissue specimens, relative to corresponding normal cells. (2) Expression of recombinase is further induced by exposure of BAC cells to a carcinogen, nickel chloride, which is also recombinogenic; (Li ; Shammas ). (3) In concordance with RAD51 expression, HR activity is also elevated in BAC and colon cancer cells. (4) RAD51-specific shRNA (RS)-suppressed RAD51 without altering the expression of other genes associated with HR or genomic instability. (5) Suppression of hsRAD51 with RS was commensurate with reduced HR activity. (6) Whereas BAC cells transduced with control shRNA acquired genomic changes, increasing in number with time, the acquisition of such changes was significantly reduced following suppression of RAD51. (7) BAC cells transduced with control or RAD51-specific shRNAs had similar growth rate. (8) Both the high mutational frequency of cells transduced with control shRNA and the substantially lower frequency in cells expressing RAD51 shRNA, were strongly correlated with the Alu frequency in individual chromosome arms. This is the first report to identify elevated HR activity as a potential target for minimizing genomic variegation in BAC cells, which accompanies (and may facilitate) tumor progression. Genomic instability in BAC is believed to arise early during oncogenesis and to be associated with cancer progression (Spechler and Goyal, 1986; Rabinovitch ; Croft ; Koppert ; Finley ; Cai ; Akagi ; Paulson ). However, the mechanisms underlying the accumulation of genomic rearrangements in cancer remain to be identified. Here, we show that the human recombinase, hsRAD51, is overexpressed in BAC cell lines and tissue specimens, accompanied by significant elevation of HR in BAC cells (R=0.84, P=0.009; R=0.94; P=0.016). HR is essential for DNA repair in cells exposed to DNA-damaging agents. In the normal cellular environment, the HR process is tightly regulated, but induction or dysregulation of HR can have harmful consequences if genomic integrity is compromised. Elevated/dysregulated recombination has been implicated in the generation of large DNA deletions (Cheng ; Shammas ), amplifications (Windle ) and LOH (Bishop and Schiestl, 2003), and may lead to activation of oncogenes, inactivation of antioncogenes, telomere maintenance and ultimately the development and progression of cancer (Sengstag, 1994; Li ; Xia ; Sturgis ; Barlund ; Maacke ; Bishop and Schiestl, 2003; Bastos ; Shammas ; Tal ; Frank ; Jara ; Silva ). Altered expression or mutation of recombinase (RAD51) and/or related HR genes have been associated with increased risk of several cancers including colorectal (Frank ), breast (Jara ; Silva ) and thyroid (Bastos ). Dysregulated expression or mutations of HR genes have been detected in a number of cancers including breast (Barlund ; Tal ), pancreatic (Maacke ), head and neck (Sturgis ), and multiple myeloma (Shammas ). We have also reported that recombinase (RAD51) and HR activity are significantly elevated in immortal and cancer cell lines (Xia ). Consistent with this study, in multiple myeloma we have shown that cancer cells with elevated HR acquire genomic changes over time; the incidence of these changes can be significantly prevented by suppression of HR, or increased by further induction of this activity (Shammas ). In this study, we also noted that the acquisition of copy-number changes on individual chromosomes strongly correlates with the density of Alu elements (Alu number per million base pairs). Alu elements are the most abundant family of repetitive DNA sequences, known collectively as short interspersed repetitive elements (Singer, 1982; Economou-Pachnis and Tsichlis, 1985; Brookfield, 1994). Alu elements comprise ~10% of the human genome, totaling over 106 copies (Abdurashitov ). Long interspersed repetitive elements, present at 20 000–40 000 copies per haploid genome, are also widely distributed across the chromosome set. Owing to their greater length (1500–6000 bp), long interspersed repetitive element make up an even larger proportion, over 15%, of the human genome. In normal circumstances and on a very long time-scale, the interspersed repetitive sequences have an important role in the evolution of genes (Hess ; Schimenti and Duncan, 1984; Brunner ). However, retrotransposal insertion of these elements at vulnerable sites in the genome has also been implicated in the etiology of diverse diseases including cancer (Miki ). Changes at repetitive DNA sequences, roughly indicative of microsatellite instability, as well as LOH, have been reported in all stages of BAC including premalignancy and BE (Cai ). Our data suggest that Alu repetitive DNA elements, whether because of their size, number or distribution throughout the genome, provide an abundant source of homologous-sequence targets for an overactive HR machinery, and thus may adversely affect the short-term genomic evolution associated with progression from benign neoplasia to invasive, drug resistant and metastatic cancers. Unlike somatic chromosomes, the Y chromosome does not have a homologue, and it is also unable to recombine with other chromosomes (Steinemann and Steinemann, 2005; Graves, 2006), presumably because of deleterious evolutionary consequences. Although Alu and long interspersed repetitive element frequencies are lowest on the Y chromosome, 97–99% of its repeat elements are confined to a span of just 30 million base pairs, the half of the Y chromosome-containing male-specific euchromatin. Interestingly, all copy-number changes also occurred within this region only. Repeat sequence families are preferred substrates for chromosomal aberrations in cancer, presumably mediated by unequal HR during mitoses (Kolomietz ). Interestingly, under our experimental conditions, the Y chromosome consistently demonstrated the highest copy-number instability, despite having the lowest Alu density. Moreover, in both independent experiments, the evaluation by array CGH showed that copy-number changes in RAD51-suppressed cells were substantially reduced in all chromosomes except Y, which was unaffected or only slightly affected by RAD51-suppression. Thus, Y chromosome mutations represent a larger fraction of total mutations observed after RAD51-suppression. It is not clear how the copy-number changes on Y chromosome remain less responsive to HR suppression. However, the data indicate that the high mutational instability at Y chromosome may involve RAD51-independent mechanisms, in addition to Rad51-mediated HR. The genetic instability of the Y chromosome is not entirely unexpected. On an evolutionary timeframe, there is precedent for regarding the Y chromosome as genetically unstable. Although thought to have once contained more than 1000 genes, only about 45 active genes now reside on this chromosome, and it is estimated to lose 4.6 genes per million years (Graves, 2004). The low selection pressure, in the absence of any essential gene for survival, may be one of the reasons for the observed high mutation rate of Y DNA. In summary, our data convincingly establish a direct correlation between elevated/dysregulated recombinase (RAD51) expression and ongoing genomic instability, studied in BAC cells in vitro as a model system for cancer progression. Significant stabilization of mutations on suppression of upregulated RAD51 convincingly shows the importance of this gene as a therapeutic target in cancer. Thus, inhibitors of RAD51 or other HR components/complexes have the potential to block or slow progression from benign to malignant disease and in particular to delay the acquisition of drug resistance in a wide variety of cancers. To date, no specific hsRAD51 inhibitors have been validated and approved for therapeutic use, although our work strongly implies that drug screening and identification of RAD51 inhibitors would be a valuable addition to our cancer-treatment armorarium. Additionally, our data suggest that repetitive DNA elements in the genome, in particular Alu elements, may contribute to the well-known genomic instability of cancer cells.

Materials and methods

Tissue specimens and cell lines

Specimens of BE and adenocarcinoma (from the Tissue Core Facility at Karmanos Cancer Institute) were used under a protocol approved by the IRB of Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA. The BAC cell line FLO-I was described previously (Aggarwal ). The BAC cell line OE33, from the European Collection of Cell Cultures (purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) has been described previously (Tselepis ; Ogunwobi and Beales, 2008). Normal primary HEEC (ScienCell Research Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were described previously (Yoshida ; Shammas ). Normal human diploid fibroblast strain GM01662 (from the Genetic Mutant Cell Repository funded by the National Institute for General Medical Sciences and maintained by the Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, NJ, USA) have been described previously (Shammas ). Normal fibroblasts and FLO-1 cells (Shammas , 1999) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone, South Logan, UT, USA). OE33 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 2mM L-glutamine and 10% fetal bovine serum. Normal HEEC cells were cultured in epithelial cell medium-2 (ScienCell Research Laboratories). Colon cancer cell lines SW480, SW620, HCT116 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and normal human colonic smooth muscle cells from ScienCell Research Laboratories. Cells were maintained in a state of logarithmic growth at 37 °C in humidified air with 5% CO2. For RNA and protein analyses, cultures were harvested at the same final cell density (5×105/ml), and immediately processed.

Recombination assay

We have previously used a plasmid substrate ‘DR1’ to assess HR frequency in human cells (Xia ; Shammas ). For this study, we used an improved HR substrate plasmid containing two incomplete but overlapping fragments of firefly luciferase (Fluc), separated by an Amp gene. HR between identical sequences of two fragments generates a functional Fluc gene, resulting in removal of the Amp gene. Gaussia luciferase (Gluc) serves as internal control and remains unaffected by HR. The plasmid is introduced into test cells, the cells are harvested after appropriate incubation, and HR is assessed by the ratio of firefly and Gaussia luciferase activities. Assessment of HR in various cell lines with this new HRreporter plasmid is consistent with our previously used plasmid substrate (R=0.993).

Immunohistochemical and western blot analyses

RAD51 mouse monoclonal and horseradish peroxidase- or Alexa-Fluor 488-labeled secondary antibodies were purchased and provided to the Tissue Core Facility of the Karmanos Cancer Institute. The tissue core facility used these antibodies to evaluate the expression of RAD51 in the specimens of human esophagi, under approved Institutional Review Board protocol. Briefly, the sections of paraffin-embedded BE and BAC tissues were deparaffinized, blocked, and sequentially treated with anti-RAD51 mouse monoclonal and horseradish peroxidase- or Alexa-Fluor 488-labeled secondary antibodies, and viewed under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA). For western blot analyses, extracts equivalent of 50 μg protein were suspended in Laemmli’s sample buffer (0.1M Tris–HCl buffer pH 6.8, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.05% β-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol and 0.001% bromophenol blue), boiled for 2 min, and electrophoresed on 4–20% glycerol gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel for 4 h at 120 V. Gels were electroblotted onto Trans-Blot nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) at 40V for 3 h in a Tris-glycine buffer system. Membranes were incubated with the indicated antibodies, with constant rocking for 2 h at room temperature in phosphate-buffered saline-Tween 20 containing 1% bovine serum albumin. Blots were washed with phosphate-buffered saline-Tween 20 and incubated in either anti-rabbit or antimouse antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase for 2 h in phosphate-buffered saline-Tween 20 containing 3% nonfat dry milk. After washing, specific proteins were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit, according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Amersham Life Sciences Inc., Arlington Heights, IL, USA).

Lentiviruses and transductions

Lentivirus particles producing either non-targeted control (C) shRNAs or those targeting human RAD51 (R) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA. Cells (2×105 per well) were seeded into 24-well plates one day before transduction. On the day of transduction, medium was replaced with fresh medium containing hexadimethrine bromide at a final concentration of 8 μg/ml. Lentiviral particles (25 μl) were added to each well, mixed and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. After 16 h, the virus-containing medium was replaced with fresh medium and cells maintained in culture. On the next day, cells were trypsinized and transferred to 25 cm2 flasks. After another 48 h, puromycin was added to the medium at a final concentration of 1 μg/ml. Suppression of HsRAD51 protein expression was confirmed by western blotting after 7 days of puromycin selection.

Gene expression analysis and biostatistics

Total RNA was isolated utilizing an ‘RNeasy’ kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) and the gene-expression profile was evaluated using Gene 1.0 ST Arrays (Affymetrix), as described previously (Munshi , 2004; Shammas , 2004, 2006). GeneChip arrays were scanned on a GeneArray Scanner (Affymetrix, Inc.), and normalized expression levels were calculated by the dChip Analyzer using the ‘Invariant Set’ normalization method at probe level to make arrays comparable, and the model-based method for probe selection and to compute adjusted expression values (Li and Hong, 2001; Li and Wong, 2001).

Evaluation of genomic evolution using SNP and CGH arrays

To evaluate the roles of RAD51 and HR in the progressive accrual (‘cellular evolution’) of genomic changes, BAC cells were transduced with non-targeted control (C) or RAD51-specific (R) shRNAs. For each experiment, an aliquot of cells was harvested and frozen at the beginning of the experiment (day 0), to be used as a reference. Transduced cells were cultured for various durations and the acquisition of changes, relative to reference cells, was monitored by use of genome-wide microarray screens for LOH and copy-number changes, based on SNP arrays (Affymetrix) and CGH arrays (Agilent Technologies), respectively. For SNP analyses, genomic DNA was extracted using DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen) as per the manufacturer’s instructions, and analyzed for copy-number and heterozygosity changes using 500k SNP arrays (Affymetrix, Inc.). Briefly, two aliquots of DNA (250 ng each) were digested with NspI and StyI restriction enzymes (New England Biolabs, Boston, MA, USA), ligated to an oligonucleotides adaptor, and amplified by PCR using Titanium Taq DNA Polymerase (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). Three 100-μl PCR reactions were then set up for each StyI or NspI adaptor-ligated DNA sample. The PCR products from three reactions were pooled, concentrated, and fragmented with DNase I to a 25–200 bp size range. Fragmented PCR products were then labeled, denatured and hybridized to the array. After hybridization, the arrays were washed on an Affymetrix fluidics workstation and scanned using the Gene Chip Scanner 3000 and genotyping software, GTYPE 4.0. DChip software (http://www.dchip.org) was used for data analysis and visualization (Li and Hung Wong, 2001). Arrays were normalized to a baseline array set for moderate median probe intensity and 90% call rate. Genotype calls from cell samples harvested and frozen at the beginning of experiment (day 0) were used as baselines to identify new LOH loci in the transduced cells. For copy-number analyses, first the raw copy numbers were derived by trimmed mean analysis of signal values of each SNP in all the samples, and then inferred copy number at each SNP locus was derived by median smoothing of raw copy numbers in the neighboring five-marker window. The inferred signal values of treated samples were compared with the inferred signal values of the baseline reference samples (day 0) to estimate copy change events, defined as change in copy number in three or more consecutive SNPs, using Matlab (Natick, MA, USA). Copy-number changes were confirmed by array CGH as described below. Heterozygosity and copy-number changes throughout genome were represented as events, where an event was defined as a change in three or more consecutive SNPs. For CGH array processing, 1 μg of each genomic DNA sample was digested with AluI and RsaI restriction endonucleases. Digested DNA was fluorescently labeled using a Genomic DNA Enzymatic Labeling Kit (Agilent). Unincorporated dye molecules were removed by desalting in TE buffer (pH8.0) using Microcon YM-30 filters (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Sample concentrations (ng/ul) and dye intensities (pmol dye/μg of labeled DNA) were determined using a Nanodrop-1000 (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) UV-VIS spectrophotometer. Equal amounts of Cy3- and Cy5-labeled material were combined and hybridized to human CGH (1×1M) microarrays (Agilent Technologies), in accordance with the Agilent CGH protocol (v. 6.0). The array assemblies were contained within Agilent Sure-Hyb hybridization chambers during a 40-h incubation at 65 °C. At the end of hybridization, the arrays were washed using Agilent a-CGH wash buffers and scanned using Agilent DNA Microarray C-Scanner with Surescan High-Resolution Technology at the recommended settings. Agilent Feature Extraction software v. 10.7.1.1 was used to extract features, and data analysis was performed by Agilent CGH analytics. An aberration filter was created to include only those regions that contain three or more consecutive features.

Evaluating plasmid DNA stability in RAD51-suppressed cells

Control (C) and RAD51-suppressed (R) cells were transfected with a plasmid carrying the Gaussia secretory luciferase gene, Gluc, and plated at equal cell density, in triplicate dishes. Gluc activity in the supernatants was measured every 12 h, beginning 8 h after transfection. For each Gluc assay, medium was removed and replaced with fresh medium. Gradual loss of Gluc activity in control cells was represented as percent of activity in RAD51-suppressed (R) cells.

Evaluating correlation of HR with ALU frequency in the genome

FLO-1 cells transduced with non-targeting (C) or RAD51-specific (R) shRNAs, from two independent experiments, were cultured and copy-number changes were evaluated using CGH arrays and ‘day 0’ cells as the baseline control, as described above. Mutation frequency, defined as copy-number changes/108-bp, was calculated for each chromosome. The number of Alu elements in each chromosome was calculated based on the human genome database (Genome/Assembly: Human—March 2006—hg18) and Repeatmasker, version 3.2.7 (http://www.repeatmasker.org/cgi-bin/AnnotationRequest). The Alu frequency was expressed as Alu number/106-bp of a chromosome. To indicate locations of mutations with reference to Alu elements, point mutations or the ends of each deletion or insertion, and Alu positions, were plotted at their corresponding locations on each chromosome, using GraphPad Prism software (La Jolla, CA, USA), with centromeric position localized using the UCSC Genome Browser.
  79 in total

1.  Malignant instability. Workshop on Genetic Instability and its Role in Carcinogenesis sponsored by the Programs in Molecular Medicine of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, January 11-12, 1991.

Authors:  P E Neiman; L H Hartwell
Journal:  New Biol       Date:  1991-04

2.  A central role for chromosome breakage in gene amplification, deletion formation, and amplicon integration.

Authors:  B Windle; B W Draper; Y X Yin; S O'Gorman; G M Wahl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Insertion of an Alu SINE in the human homologue of the Mlvi-2 locus.

Authors:  A Economou-Pachnis; P N Tsichlis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1985-12-09       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Dual evolutionary modes in the bovine globin locus.

Authors:  A M Brunner; J C Schimenti; C H Duncan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1986-09-09       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Progression to cancer in Barrett's esophagus is associated with genomic instability.

Authors:  P S Rabinovitch; B J Reid; R C Haggitt; T H Norwood; C E Rubin
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 6.  Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  S J Spechler; R K Goyal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Insertion of long interspersed repeated elements at the Igh (immunoglobulin heavy chain) and Mlvi-2 (Moloney leukemia virus integration 2) loci of rats.

Authors:  A Economou-Pachnis; M A Lohse; A V Furano; P N Tsichlis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  K-ras activation in gastric epithelial tumors in Japanese.

Authors:  H Miki; M Ohmori; A O Perantoni; T Enomoto
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1991-06-14       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  p53 gene mutations in gastric cancer metastases and in gastric cancer cell lines derived from metastases.

Authors:  Y Yamada; T Yoshida; K Hayashi; T Sekiya; J Yokota; S Hirohashi; K Nakatani; H Nakano; T Sugimura; M Terada
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Lack of DNA homology in a pair of divergent chromosomes greatly sensitizes them to loss by DNA damage.

Authors:  M A Resnick; M Skaanild; T Nilsson-Tillgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  24 in total

1.  DNA glycosylase activity and cell proliferation are key factors in modulating homologous recombination in vivo.

Authors:  Orsolya Kiraly; Guanyu Gong; Megan D Roytman; Yoshiyuki Yamada; Leona D Samson; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Repetitive sequences, genomic instability and Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Masood A Shammas
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2011-09-01

3.  RAD51 regulates CHK1 stability via autophagy to promote cell growth in esophageal squamous carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Xinyi Zhu; Qiuhui Pan; Nan Huang; Jianchun Wu; Ni Zhen; Fenyong Sun; Zhi Li; Qingyuan Yang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-10-14

4.  Targeting PI3K and RAD51 in Barrett's adenocarcinoma: impact on DNA damage checkpoints, expression profile and tumor growth.

Authors:  Jagannath Pal; Mariateresa Fulciniti; Puru Nanjappa; Leutz Buon; Yu-Tzu Tai; Pierfrancesco Tassone; Nikhil C Munshi; Masood A Shammas
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.069

Review 5.  DNA repair targeted therapy: The past or future of cancer treatment?

Authors:  Navnath S Gavande; Pamela S VanderVere-Carozza; Hilary D Hinshaw; Shadia I Jalal; Catherine R Sears; Katherine S Pawelczak; John J Turchi
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 12.310

6.  Recombinant cells in the lung increase with age via de novo recombination events and clonal expansion.

Authors:  Takafumi Kimoto; Jennifer E Kay; Na Li; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 7.  Biology of telomeres: importance in etiology of esophageal cancer and as therapeutic target.

Authors:  Jagannath Pal; Jason S Gold; Nikhil C Munshi; Masood A Shammas
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 8.  Inflammation-induced DNA damage, mutations and cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Kay; Elina Thadhani; Leona Samson; Bevin Engelward
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-25

9.  Excision of mutagenic replication-blocking lesions suppresses cancer but promotes cytotoxicity and lethality in nitrosamine-exposed mice.

Authors:  Jennifer E Kay; Joshua J Corrigan; Amanda L Armijo; Ilana S Nazari; Ishwar N Kohale; Dorothea K Torous; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Robert G Croy; Dushan N Wadduwage; Sebastian E Carrasco; Stephen D Dertinger; Forest M White; John M Essigmann; Leona D Samson; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Analysis of mutations in tumor and normal adjacent tissue via fluorescence detection.

Authors:  Jennifer E Kay; Sheyla Mirabal; William E Briley; Takafumi Kimoto; Theofilos Poutahidis; Timothy Ragan; Peter T So; Dushan N Wadduwage; Susan E Erdman; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.