PURPOSE: Treatment of chronic-phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with imatinib 400 mg/d can be unsatisfactory. Optimization of treatment is warranted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 1,014 newly diagnosed CP-CML patients were randomly assigned to imatinib 800 mg/d (n = 338), imatinib 400 mg/d (n = 325), or imatinib 400 mg/d plus interferon alfa (IFN-α; n = 351). Dose adaptation to avoid higher-grade toxicity was recommended. First primary end point was major molecular remission (MMR) at 12 months. RESULTS: A higher rate of MMR at 12 months occurred with tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg/d than with imatinib 400 mg/d (59% [95% CI, 53% to 65%] v 44% [95% CI, 37% to 50%]; P < .001) or imatinib 400 mg/d plus IFN-α (59% v 46% [95% CI, 40% to 52%]; P = .002). Median dose in the 800-mg/d arm was 628 mg/d with a maximum dose of 737 mg/d during months 4 to 6 and a maintenance dose of 600 mg/d. All three treatment approaches were well tolerated with similar grade 3 and 4 adverse events. Independent of treatment approach, MMR at 12 months showed better progression-free survival (99% v 94%; P = .0023) and overall survival (99% v 93%; P = .0011) at 3 years when compared with > 1% on the international scale or no MMR but showed no difference in 0.1% to < 1% on the international scale, which closely correlates with complete cytogenetic remission. CONCLUSION: Treatment of early-phase CML with imatinib can be optimized. Early high-dose therapy followed by rapid adaptation to good tolerability increases the rate of MMR at 12 months. Achievement of MMR by month 12 is directly associated with improved survival.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Treatment of chronic-phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with imatinib 400 mg/d can be unsatisfactory. Optimization of treatment is warranted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 1,014 newly diagnosed CP-CMLpatients were randomly assigned to imatinib 800 mg/d (n = 338), imatinib 400 mg/d (n = 325), or imatinib 400 mg/d plus interferon alfa (IFN-α; n = 351). Dose adaptation to avoid higher-grade toxicity was recommended. First primary end point was major molecular remission (MMR) at 12 months. RESULTS: A higher rate of MMR at 12 months occurred with tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg/d than with imatinib 400 mg/d (59% [95% CI, 53% to 65%] v 44% [95% CI, 37% to 50%]; P < .001) or imatinib 400 mg/d plus IFN-α (59% v 46% [95% CI, 40% to 52%]; P = .002). Median dose in the 800-mg/d arm was 628 mg/d with a maximum dose of 737 mg/d during months 4 to 6 and a maintenance dose of 600 mg/d. All three treatment approaches were well tolerated with similar grade 3 and 4 adverse events. Independent of treatment approach, MMR at 12 months showed better progression-free survival (99% v 94%; P = .0023) and overall survival (99% v 93%; P = .0011) at 3 years when compared with > 1% on the international scale or no MMR but showed no difference in 0.1% to < 1% on the international scale, which closely correlates with complete cytogenetic remission. CONCLUSION: Treatment of early-phase CML with imatinib can be optimized. Early high-dose therapy followed by rapid adaptation to good tolerability increases the rate of MMR at 12 months. Achievement of MMR by month 12 is directly associated with improved survival.
Authors: Andreas L Petzer; Dominic Fong; Thomas Lion; Irina Dyagil; Zvenyslava Masliak; Andrija Bogdanovic; Laimonas Griskevicius; Sandra Lejniece; Stefan Goranov; Liana Gercheva; Aleksandar Stojanovic; Dontcho Peytchev; Nikolay Tzvetkov; Rasa Griniute; Atanas Stanchev; Thomas Grubinger; Marthin Kwakkelstein; Peter Schuld; Guenther Gastl; Dominik Wolf Journal: Haematologica Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Michael Lauseker; Benjamin Hanfstein; Claudia Haferlach; Susanne Schnittger; Markus Pfirrmann; Alice Fabarius; Brigitte Schlegelberger; Susanne Saußele; Christian T Dietz; Philipp Erben; Rüdiger Hehlmann; Joerg Hasford; Andreas Hochhaus; Martin C Müller Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2014-06-22 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Susanne Saussele; Marie-Paloma Krauss; Rüdiger Hehlmann; Michael Lauseker; Ulrike Proetel; Lida Kalmanti; Benjamin Hanfstein; Alice Fabarius; Doris Kraemer; Wolfgang E Berdel; Martin Bentz; Peter Staib; Maike de Wit; Martin Wernli; Florian Zettl; Holger F Hebart; Markus Hahn; Jochen Heymanns; Ingo Schmidt-Wolf; Norbert Schmitz; Michael J Eckart; Winfried Gassmann; Andrea Bartholomäus; Antonio Pezzutto; Elisabeth Oppliger Leibundgut; Dominik Heim; Stefan W Krause; Andreas Burchert; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Joerg Hasford; Andreas Hochhaus; Markus Pfirrmann; Martin C Müller Journal: Blood Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 22.113