Literature DB >> 21422211

Sequential population pharmacokinetic modeling of lopinavir and ritonavir in healthy volunteers and assessment of different dosing strategies.

Laura Dickinson1, Marta Boffito, David Back, Laura Else, Nils von Hentig, Geraint Davies, Saye Khoo, Anton Pozniak, Graeme Moyle, Leon Aarons.   

Abstract

Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was applied to explore the relationship between lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations over 72 h following drug cessation and also to assess other lopinavir and ritonavir dosing strategies compared to the standard 400-mg-100-mg twice-daily dose. Data from 16 healthy volunteers were included. Possible covariates influencing lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics were also assessed. Data were modeled first separately and then together by using individually predicted ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters in the final lopinavir model. The model was evaluated by means of a visual predictive check and external validation. A maximum-effect model in which ritonavir inhibited the elimination of lopinavir best described the relationship between ritonavir concentrations and lopinavir clearance (CL/F). A ritonavir concentration of 0.06 mg/liter was associated with a 50% maximum inhibition of the lopinavir CL/F. The population prediction of the lopinavir CL/F in the absence of ritonavir was 21.6 liters/h (relative standard error, 14.0%), and the apparent volume of distribution and absorption rate constant were 55.3 liters (relative standard error, 10.2%) and 0.57 h(-1) (relative standard error, 0.39%), respectively. Overall, 92% and 94% of the observed concentrations were encompassed by the 95% prediction intervals for lopinavir and ritonavir, respectively, which is indicative of an adequate model. Predictions of concentrations from an external data set (HIV infected) (n = 12) satisfied predictive performance criteria. Simulated lopinavir exposures at lopinavir-ritonavir doses of 200 mg-150 mg and 200 mg-50 mg twice daily were 38% and 65% lower, respectively, than that of the standard dose. The model allows a better understanding of the interaction between lopinavir and ritonavir and may allow a better prediction of lopinavir concentrations and assessments of different dosing strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21422211      PMCID: PMC3101471          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00887-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  12 in total

1.  The tablet formulation of lopinavir/ritonavir provides similar bioavailability to the soft-gelatin capsule formulation with less pharmacokinetic variability and diminished food effect.

Authors:  Cheri Enders Klein; Yi-Lin Chiu; Walid Awni; Tong Zhu; Renee S Heuser; Thao Doan; Joerg Breitenbach; John B Morris; Scott C Brun; George J Hanna
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 2.  Lopinavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection.

Authors:  Vicki Oldfield; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Validation of a rapid and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) assay for the simultaneous determination of existing and new antiretroviral compounds.

Authors:  Laura Else; Victoria Watson; John Tjia; Andrew Hughes; Marco Siccardi; Saye Khoo; David Back
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.205

4.  Metabolism and disposition of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor lopinavir (ABT-378) given in combination with ritonavir in rats, dogs, and humans.

Authors:  Gondi N Kumar; Venkata K Jayanti; Marianne K Johnson; John Uchic; Samuel Thomas; Ronald D Lee; Brian A Grabowski; Hing L Sham; Dale J Kempf; Jon F Denissen; Kennan C Marsh; Eugene Sun; Stanley A Roberts
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Simultaneous population pharmacokinetic model for lopinavir and ritonavir in HIV-infected adults.

Authors:  José Moltó; Manuel José Barbanoj; Cristina Miranda; Asunción Blanco; José Ramón Santos; Eugenia Negredo; Joan Costa; Pere Domingo; Bonaventura Clotet; Marta Valle
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Pharmacokinetics of atazanavir/ritonavir once daily and lopinavir/ritonavir twice and once daily over 72 h following drug cessation.

Authors:  Marta Boffito; Laura Else; David Back; Jessica Taylor; Saye Khoo; Marta Sousa; Anton Pozniak; Brian Gazzard; Graeme Moyle
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2008

7.  Saquinavir drug exposure is not impaired by the boosted double protease inhibitor combination of lopinavir/ritonavir.

Authors:  Christoph Stephan; Nils von Hentig; Irene Kourbeti; Brenda Dauer; Manfred Mösch; Thomas Lutz; Stephan Klauke; Sebastian Harder; Michael Kurowski; Schlomo Staszewski
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 4.177

8.  Effects of ritonavir-boosted darunavir vs. ritonavir-boosted atazanavir on lipid and glucose parameters in HIV-negative, healthy volunteers.

Authors:  F Tomaka; E Lefebvre; V Sekar; B Van Baelen; T Vangeneugden; A Vandevoorde; G Diego Miralles
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 3.180

9.  A combined model for predicting CYP3A4 clinical net drug-drug interaction based on CYP3A4 inhibition, inactivation, and induction determined in vitro.

Authors:  Odette A Fahmi; Tristan S Maurer; Mary Kish; Edwin Cardenas; Sherri Boldt; David Nettleton
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 3.922

10.  Atazanavir enhances saquinavir hard-gel concentrations in a ritonavir-boosted once-daily regimen.

Authors:  Marta Boffito; Michael Kurowski; Guido Kruse; Andrew Hill; Andrew A Benzie; Mark R Nelson; Graeme J Moyle; Brian G Gazzard; Anton L Pozniak
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 4.177

View more
  10 in total

1.  Impact of body weight and missed doses on lopinavir concentrations with standard and increased lopinavir/ritonavir doses during late pregnancy.

Authors:  Tim R Cressey; Saik Urien; Edmund V Capparelli; Brookie M Best; Sudanee Buranabanjasatean; Aram Limtrakul; Boonsong Rawangban; Prapan Sabsanong; Jean-Marc Treluyer; Gonzague Jourdain; Alice Stek; Marc Lallemant; Mark Mirochnick
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Model-based approach to dose optimization of lopinavir/ritonavir when co-administered with rifampicin.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Paolo Denti; Eric Decloedt; Gary Maartens; Mats O Karlsson; Ulrika S H Simonsson; Helen McIlleron
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Participants Switching to Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy with Susceptible Virus Display Inferior Adherence and Worse Outcomes: An Observational Analysis.

Authors:  Lentlametse Mantshonyane; Jason Roy; Michael Z Levy; Carole L Wallis; Kathrine Bar; Catherine Godfrey; Ann Collier; Alberto LaRosa; Lu Zheng; Xin Sun; Robert Gross
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 5.944

4.  Population pharmacokinetic modelling of the changes in atazanavir plasma clearance caused by ritonavir plasma concentrations in HIV-1 infected patients.

Authors:  José Moltó; Javier A Estévez; Cristina Miranda; Samandhy Cedeño; Bonaventura Clotet; Marta Valle
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir: Changes Across Formulations and Human Development From Infancy Through Adulthood.

Authors:  Jincheng Yang; Mina Nikanjam; Brookie M Best; Jorge Pinto; Ellen G Chadwick; Eric S Daar; Peter L Havens; Natella Rakhmanina; Edmund V Capparelli
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.126

6.  Estimation of the effect of SLCO1B1 polymorphisms on lopinavir plasma concentration in HIV-infected adults.

Authors:  Alessandro Schipani; Deirdre Egan; Laura Dickinson; Gerry Davies; Marta Boffito; Mike Youle; Saye H Khoo; David J Back; Andrew Owen
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2012-04-04

7.  Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Antiviral Agents Used to Treat SARS-CoV-2 and Their Potential Interaction with Drugs and Other Supportive Measures: A Comprehensive Review by the PK/PD of Anti-Infectives Study Group of the European Society of Antimicrobial Agents.

Authors:  Markus Zeitlinger; Birgit C P Koch; Roger Bruggemann; Pieter De Cock; Timothy Felton; Maya Hites; Jennifer Le; Sonia Luque; Alasdair P MacGowan; Deborah J E Marriott; Anouk E Muller; Kristina Nadrah; David L Paterson; Joseph F Standing; João P Telles; Michael Wölfl-Duchek; Michael Thy; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Quizartinib in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Dongwoo Kang; Elizabeth Ludwig; David Jaworowicz; Hannah Huang; Jill Fiedler-Kelly; Jorge Cortes; Siddhartha Ganguly; Samer Khaled; Alwin Krämer; Mark Levis; Giovanni Martinelli; Alexander Perl; Nigel Russell; Malaz Abutarif; Youngsook Choi; Jeanne Mendell; Ophelia Yin
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.126

9.  Simultaneous population pharmacokinetic modelling of atazanavir and ritonavir in HIV-infected adults and assessment of different dose reduction strategies.

Authors:  Alessandro Schipani; Laura Dickinson; Marta Boffito; Rupert Austin; Andrew Owen; David Back; Saye Khoo; Gerry Davies
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  Population pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir in Covid-19 patients.

Authors:  Jean Claude Alvarez; Pierre Moine; Benjamin Davido; Isabelle Etting; Djillali Annane; Islam Amine Larabi; Nicolas Simon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.953

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.