José Moltó1,2, Javier A Estévez3,4, Cristina Miranda1,2, Samandhy Cedeño5, Bonaventura Clotet1,2,5, Marta Valle3,4. 1. 'Lluita contra la Sida' Foundation, HIV Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain. 2. Department de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation CIM-St Pau., Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau-IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Departament de Farmacologia, de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 5. 'IrsiCaixa' Foundation, HIV Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of the present study was to develop a simultaneous population pharmacokinetic model for atazanavir (ATV) incorporating the effect of ritonavir (RTV) on clearance to predict ATV concentrations under different dosing regimens in HIV-1-infected patients. METHODS: A Cross-sectional study was carried out in 83 HIV-1-infected adults taking ATV 400 mg or ATV 300 mg/RTV 100 mg once daily. Demographic and clinical characteristics were registered and blood samples collected to measure drug concentrations. A population pharmacokinetic model was constructed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling and used to simulate six dosing scenarios. RESULTS: The selected one-compartmental model described the pharmacokinetics of RTV and ATV simultaneously, showing exponential, direct inhibition of ATV clearance according to the RTV plasma concentration, which explained 17.5% of the variability. A mean RTV plasma concentration of 0.63 mg l-1 predicted an 18% decrease in ATV clearance. The percentages of patients with an end-of-dose-interval concentration of ATV below or above the minimum and maximum target concentrations of 0.15 mg l-1 and 0.85 mg l-1 favoured the selection of the simulated ATV/RTV once-daily regimens (ATV 400 mg, ATV 300 mg/RTV 100 mg, ATV 300 mg/RTV 50 mg, ATV 200/RTV 100 mg) over the unboosted twice-daily regimens (ATV 300 mg, ATV 200 mg). CONCLUSIONS: A one-compartment simultaneous model can describe the pharmacokinetics of RTV and ATV, including the effect of RTV plasma concentrations on ATV clearance. This model is promising for predicting individuals' ATV concentrations in clinical scenarios, and supports further clinical trials of once-daily doses of ATV 300 mg/RTV 50 mg or ATV 200 mg/RTV 100 mg to confirm efficacy and safety.
AIMS: The aim of the present study was to develop a simultaneous population pharmacokinetic model for atazanavir (ATV) incorporating the effect of ritonavir (RTV) on clearance to predict ATV concentrations under different dosing regimens in HIV-1-infectedpatients. METHODS: A Cross-sectional study was carried out in 83 HIV-1-infected adults taking ATV 400 mg or ATV 300 mg/RTV 100 mg once daily. Demographic and clinical characteristics were registered and blood samples collected to measure drug concentrations. A population pharmacokinetic model was constructed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling and used to simulate six dosing scenarios. RESULTS: The selected one-compartmental model described the pharmacokinetics of RTV and ATV simultaneously, showing exponential, direct inhibition of ATV clearance according to the RTV plasma concentration, which explained 17.5% of the variability. A mean RTV plasma concentration of 0.63 mg l-1 predicted an 18% decrease in ATV clearance. The percentages of patients with an end-of-dose-interval concentration of ATV below or above the minimum and maximum target concentrations of 0.15 mg l-1 and 0.85 mg l-1 favoured the selection of the simulated ATV/RTV once-daily regimens (ATV 400 mg, ATV 300 mg/RTV 100 mg, ATV 300 mg/RTV 50 mg, ATV 200/RTV 100 mg) over the unboosted twice-daily regimens (ATV 300 mg, ATV 200 mg). CONCLUSIONS: A one-compartment simultaneous model can describe the pharmacokinetics of RTV and ATV, including the effect of RTV plasma concentrations on ATV clearance. This model is promising for predicting individuals' ATV concentrations in clinical scenarios, and supports further clinical trials of once-daily doses of ATV 300 mg/RTV 50 mg or ATV 200 mg/RTV 100 mg to confirm efficacy and safety.
Authors: Jacqueline A H Droste; Rob E Aarnoutse; Peter P Koopmans; Yechiel A Hekster; David M Burger Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2003-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Jian-Feng Lu; Terrence F Blaschke; Charles Flexner; Susan L Rosenkranz; Lewis B Sheiner Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Chao Zhang; Paolo Denti; Eric Decloedt; Gary Maartens; Mats O Karlsson; Ulrika S H Simonsson; Helen McIlleron Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: José Moltó; George Xinarianos; Cristina Miranda; Sudeep Pushpakom; Samandhy Cedeño; Bonaventura Clotet; Andrew Owen; Marta Valle Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Peter L Anderson; Christina L Aquilante; Edward M Gardner; Julie Predhomme; Patrick McDaneld; Lane R Bushman; Jia-Hua Zheng; Michelle Ray; Samantha MaWhinney Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2009-08-26 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: D R Niel Malan; Edrich Krantz; Neal David; Marina Mathew; Uchenna H Iloeje; Donnie McGrath Journal: J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic) Date: 2010 Jan-Feb
Authors: Laura Dickinson; Marta Boffito; David Back; Laura Waters; Laura Else; Geraint Davies; Saye Khoo; Anton Pozniak; Leon Aarons Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2009-03-28 Impact factor: 5.790