Literature DB >> 21421744

Differences of the quality of care experience: the perception of patients with either network or conventional health plans.

Peter Berchtold1, Beat Künzi, André Busato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various studies have been performed on differences in quality measures between different models of primary care with inconclusive results. In Switzerland, up to a third of the population chooses network health plans including gatekeeping to profit from lower premiums and almost half of GPs work in primary care networks.
OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in the quality of interpersonal care and practice management between patients consulting a physician organized in a GP network or in independent practice.
METHODS: We analysed data of the European Project on Patient Evaluation of General Practice Care (EUROPEP) questionnaire measuring the quality of the patient-physician interaction and practice management of 473 primary care physicians. From the 25178 patients who completed the questionnaire, 72.2% (18174) consulted a physician participating in a network and 27.8% (7004) a physician working in independent practice.
RESULTS: The overall answer pattern of EUROPEP questions shows that patients were generally more satisfied with physicians in independent practice. Particularly, questions within the domains 'relation and communication' and 'information and support' and to a lesser degree within 'Medical care' were significantly answered more favourable by patients of independent physicians. Stratification for chronic diseases showed that significant differences favouring independent physicians were less evident in patients with chronic diseases than in the non-chronic group.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show differences in the quality of interpersonal care and practice management experienced by patients consulting network-or independent physicians. Therefore, we suggest that efforts to reduce health care spending by promoting more integrated care must also focus on monitoring and improving patient perceived qualities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21421744     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmr010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of Brazilian Primary Health Care From the Perspective of the Users: Accessible, Continuous, and Acceptable?

Authors:  Márcia Cristina Rodrigues Fausto; Aylene Bousquat; Juliana Gagno Lima; Ligia Giovanella; Patty Fidelis de Almeida; Maria Helena Magalhães de Mendonça; Helena Seidl; Andréa Tenório Correia da Silva
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2017 Apr/Jun

2.  Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy.

Authors:  Manila Bonciani; Sara Barsanti; Anna Maria Murante
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions.

Authors:  Renata Papp; Ilona Borbas; Eva Dobos; Maren Bredehorst; Lina Jaruseviciene; Tuulikki Vehko; Sandor Balogh
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Questionnaires that measure the quality of relationships between patients and primary care providers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lauren E Ball; Katelyn A Barnes; Lisa Crossland; Caroline Nicholson; Claire Jackson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.