Literature DB >> 21421239

Imaging use and cryptorchidism: determinants of practice patterns.

Gregory E Tasian1, Jenny H Yiee, Hillary L Copp.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the rate of diagnostic imaging use for the preoperative evaluation of boys with cryptorchidism and the factors that influence referring providers to obtain imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional survey of pediatricians randomly sampled from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. The primary outcome was whether the respondent obtained imaging at the initial evaluation of boys with cryptorchidism. Participants were queried regarding practice location and type, length of time in practice, frequency of reading academic journals and the accessibility of surgical subspecialists. For those who ordered imaging, respondents were asked how frequently they ordered imaging, and were asked to select patient factors and professional beliefs that influenced their decision to obtain imaging. Factors associated with imaging use were identified using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of the pediatricians who acknowledged contact by surveyors 47% completed the survey and 34% of respondents reported always or usually ordering imaging. Of those who obtained imaging 96.4% used ultrasound. Pediatricians in practice fewer than 20 years (OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.92-6.16) and those in nonacademic practices (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.34-6.71) were more likely to order imaging. Pediatricians obtained imaging because of beliefs that imaging reliably identifies a nonpalpable testis, reassures the family and assists the surgeon with operative planning.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is heavily used by pediatricians for the preoperative evaluation of cryptorchidism, especially when the testis is nonpalpable. Given the poor diagnostic performance of ultrasound in this setting, we recommend developing strategies to reduce imaging use in cryptorchidism.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21421239      PMCID: PMC4165644          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

1.  Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians.

Authors:  William L Cull; Karen G O'Connor; Sanford Sharp; Suk-fong S Tang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Laparoscopic management of nonpalpable testes: a multicenter study of the Italian Society of Video Surgery in Infancy.

Authors:  Alfonso Papparella; Pio Parmeggiani; Giovanni Cobellis; Luciano Mastroianni; Giuseppe Stranieri; Nicola Pappalepore; Girolamo Mattioli; Ciro Esposito; Mario Lima
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 3.  Survey: localization and operation for nonpalpable testes.

Authors:  F Hinman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.

Authors:  D A Asch; M K Jedrziewski; N A Christakis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in nonpalpable cryptorchidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gregory E Tasian; Hillary L Copp
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Laparoscopic evaluation and management of nonpalpable testis in children.

Authors:  G Lotan; B Klin; Y Efrati; T Bistritzer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Ultrasonography is unnecessary in evaluating boys with a nonpalpable testis.

Authors:  Jack S Elder
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Comparison of ultrasonographic and laparoscopic findings in adult nonpalpable testes cases.

Authors:  Mehmet Zekai Pekkafali; Coskun Sahin; Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey; Selami Albayrak; Sukru Yildirim; Cihat Cinar Basekim
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography compared with surgical findings in the localization of the undescended testis.

Authors:  M Maghnie; A Vanzulli; P Paesano; R Bragheri; G Palladini; P Preti; A Del Maschio; F Severi
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1994-07

10.  Laparoscopic evaluation of the nonpalpable tests: a prospective assessment of accuracy.

Authors:  R G Moore; C A Peters; S B Bauer; J Mandell; A B Retik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  10 in total

1.  Commentary: preoperative evaluation in cryptorchidism.

Authors:  Graeme Pitcher
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Initial laparoscopy and optimized approach for unilateral nonpalpable testis: review of 8-year single-center experience.

Authors:  Ahmed Zaki Mohamed Anwar; Tarek Khalaf Fathelbab; Amr Mohamed Abdelhamid; Ehab Mohmed Galal; Mostafa Magdi Ali; Ehab Rifat Tawfiek
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Misuse of ultrasound for palpable undescended testis by primary care providers: A prospective study.

Authors:  Nathan C Wong; Rahul K Bansal; Armando J Lorenzo; Jorge DeMaria; Luis H Braga
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Diagnostic imaging in cryptorchidism: utility, indications, and effectiveness.

Authors:  Gregory E Tasian; Hillary L Copp; Laurence S Baskin
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 5.  Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in nonpalpable cryptorchidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gregory E Tasian; Hillary L Copp
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Cryptorchidism and the value of ultrasonography.

Authors:  M Shoukry; K Pojak; M S Choudhry
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Evaluation of Pediatric Undescended Testes with Elastosonography.

Authors:  Mehmet Burak Çildağ
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2017-05-04

8.  Scrotal Ultrasound Is Not Routinely Indicated in the Management of Cryptorchidism, Retractile Testes, and Hydrocele in Children.

Authors:  Lisa B E Shields; Jeffrey T White; Dennis S Peppas; Eran Rosenberg
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2019-11-21

Review 9.  Unnecessary diagnostic imaging: a review of the literature on preoperative imaging for boys with undescended testes.

Authors:  Siobhán Hartigan; Gregory E Tasian
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-12

10.  Abnormal descent of the testis and its complications: A multimodality imaging review.

Authors:  Pankaj Nepal; Devendra Kumar; Vijayanadh Ojili
Journal:  SA J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.