Gregory E Tasian1, Hillary L Copp. 1. Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0738, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Ultrasound is frequently obtained during the presurgical evaluation of boys with nonpalpable undescended testes, but its clinical utility is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic performance of ultrasound in localizing nonpalpable testes in pediatric patients. METHODS: English-language articles were identified by searching Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. We included studies of subjects younger than 18 years who had preoperative ultrasound evaluation for nonpalpable testes and whose testis position was determined by surgery. Data on testis location determined by ultrasound and surgery were extracted by 2 independent reviewers, from which ultrasound performance characteristics (true-positives, false-positives, false-negatives, and true-negatives) were derived. Meta-analysis of 12 studies (591 testes) was performed by using a random-effects regression model; composite estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Ultrasound has a sensitivity of 45% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29-61) and a specificity of 78% (95% CI: 43-94). The positive and negative likelihood ratios are 1.48 (95% CI: 0.54-4.03) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.46-1.35), respectively. A positive ultrasound result increases and negative ultrasound result decreases the probability that a nonpalpable testis is located within the abdomen from 55% to 64% and 49%, respectively. Significant heterogeneity limited the precision of these estimates, which was attributable to variability in the reporting of selection criteria, ultrasound methodology, and differences in the proportion of intraabdominal testes. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound does not reliably localize nonpalpable testes and does not rule out an intraabdominal testis. Eliminating the use of ultrasound will not change management of nonpalpable cryptorchidism but will decrease health care expenditures.
CONTEXT: Ultrasound is frequently obtained during the presurgical evaluation of boys with nonpalpable undescended testes, but its clinical utility is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic performance of ultrasound in localizing nonpalpable testes in pediatric patients. METHODS: English-language articles were identified by searching Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. We included studies of subjects younger than 18 years who had preoperative ultrasound evaluation for nonpalpable testes and whose testis position was determined by surgery. Data on testis location determined by ultrasound and surgery were extracted by 2 independent reviewers, from which ultrasound performance characteristics (true-positives, false-positives, false-negatives, and true-negatives) were derived. Meta-analysis of 12 studies (591 testes) was performed by using a random-effects regression model; composite estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Ultrasound has a sensitivity of 45% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29-61) and a specificity of 78% (95% CI: 43-94). The positive and negative likelihood ratios are 1.48 (95% CI: 0.54-4.03) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.46-1.35), respectively. A positive ultrasound result increases and negative ultrasound result decreases the probability that a nonpalpable testis is located within the abdomen from 55% to 64% and 49%, respectively. Significant heterogeneity limited the precision of these estimates, which was attributable to variability in the reporting of selection criteria, ultrasound methodology, and differences in the proportion of intraabdominal testes. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound does not reliably localize nonpalpable testes and does not rule out an intraabdominal testis. Eliminating the use of ultrasound will not change management of nonpalpable cryptorchidism but will decrease health care expenditures.
Authors: Penny Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jos Kleijnen Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2003-11-10 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Athina C Tsili; Michele Bertolotto; Ahmet Tuncay Turgut; Vikram Dogra; Simon Freeman; Laurence Rocher; Jane Belfield; Michal Studniarek; Alexandra Ntorkou; Lorenzo E Derchi; Raymond Oyen; Parvati Ramchandani; Mustafa Secil; Jonathan Richenberg Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tobias De Zordo; Daniel Stronegger; Leo Pallwein-Prettner; Chris J Harvey; Germar Pinggera; Werner Jaschke; Friedrich Aigner; Ferdinand Frauscher Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 14.432