Literature DB >> 21420188

Prevalence of computed tomographic angiography-verified high-risk plaques and significant luminal stenosis in patients with zero coronary calcium score.

Hitomi Morita1, Shinichiro Fujimoto, Takeshi Kondo, Takehiro Arai, Takako Sekine, Hideyuki Matsutani, Tomonari Sano, Makoto Kondo, Takahide Kodama, Shinichi Takase, Jagat Narula.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some patients were detected with coronary artery disease even if the coronary artery calcium score was (CACS)=0. We evaluated the prevalence and predictor of significant stenosis and computed tomography (CT) based vulnerable plaque (CTVP) for patients with CACS=0.
METHODS: Subjects were 2160 patients (M/F=1110/1050, 64.7 ± 11.6 years) who underwent measurement of calcium score and CT coronary angiography. As for CACS=0 group, age, gender, coronary risk factor (family history (FH), hypertension (HT), hyperlipidemia (HL), diabetes (DM), and smoking), body mass index, history of cerebral infarction, the presence of chest symptom, and abnormal rest ECG findings were investigated as predictors for significant stenosis and CTVP by multivariate analysis using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Out of 2160 patients, 1141 (52.8%, M/F=655/486, 68.4 ± 9.8 years) were of CACS>0 and 1019 (47.2%, M/F=455/564, 60.5 ± 12.0 years) were of CACS=0. In the CACS=0 group, 24 patients (2.4%) were found with significant stenosis and 47 (4.6%) with 2FPP. In 104 patients with spotty calcification (10.2%), 10 (9.6%) out of these 104 had significant stenosis and also had CTVP. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression analysis revealed significant predictor for significant stenosis to be only male (Odds ratio (OR): 3.075, 95%CI 1.166-8.109, p=0.0232) and significant predictor for CTVP to be age (OR: 1.032, 95%CI 1.001-1.063, p=0.0437) and male (OR: 2.386, 95%CI 1.193-4.775, p=0.0140).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the presence of CTVP must be noted, when patients are male and elderly even if CACS=0 and the presence of spotty calcification increases the prevalence of significant stenosis and CTVP in patients with CACS=0.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21420188     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.02.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  10 in total

1.  Prognostic value of cardiovascular CT: is coronary artery calcium screening enough? The added value of CCTA.

Authors:  Erick Alexanderson; Nadia Canseco-León; Fernando Iñarra; Aloha Meave; Damini Dey
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Impact of iterative reconstruction on CT coronary calcium quantification.

Authors:  Akira Kurata; Anoeshka Dharampal; Admir Dedic; Pim J de Feyter; Gabriel P Krestin; Marcel L Dijkshoorn; Koen Nieman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Epicardial adipose tissue: far more than a fat depot.

Authors:  Andrew H Talman; Peter J Psaltis; James D Cameron; Ian T Meredith; Sujith K Seneviratne; Dennis T L Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-12

4.  Coronary artery calcium score as a gatekeeper in the non-invasive evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Elsemiek M Engbers; Jorik R Timmer; Jan Paul Ottervanger
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Beyond Coronary Stenosis: Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for the Assessment of Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden.

Authors:  Alan C Kwan; George Cater; Jose Vargas; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2013-01-22

6.  A novel method for non-invasive plaque morphology analysis by coronary computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Shinichiro Fujimoto; Takeshi Kondo; Takahide Kodama; Yasuko Fujisawa; John Groarke; Kanako K Kumamaru; Kazuhisa Takamura; Eriko Matsunaga; Katsumi Miyauchi; Hiroyuki Daida; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Significance of Small Calcifications in Patients with a Zero Calcium Score.

Authors:  Shinichiro Fujimoto
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.928

8.  Relation between mild to moderate chronic kidney disease and coronary artery disease determined with coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Ivo A Joosen; Frank Schiphof; Mathijs O Versteylen; Eduard M Laufer; Mark H Winkens; Patricia J Nelemans; Jeroen P Kooman; Leonard Hofstra; Joachim E Wildberger; Tim Leiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Coronary artery calcium score: a review.

Authors:  Abbas Arjmand Shabestari
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 0.611

10.  What is the optimal cut-off point for low coronary artery calcium score assessed by computed tomography? Multi-Detector Computed Tomography ANIN Registry.

Authors:  Edyta Kaczmarska; Cezary Kępka; Zofia Dzielińska; Radosław Pracoń; Karolina Kryczka; Joanna Petryka; Jerzy Pręgowski; Mariusz Kruk; Marcin Demkow
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.426

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.