Literature DB >> 20685993

Temporal discounting of reward and the cost of time in motor control.

Reza Shadmehr1, Jean Jacques Orban de Xivry, Minnan Xu-Wilson, Ting-Yu Shih.   

Abstract

Why do movements take a characteristic amount of time, and why do diseases that affect the reward system alter control of movements? Suppose that the purpose of any movement is to position our body in a more rewarding state. People and other animals discount future reward as a hyperbolic function of time. Here, we show that across populations of people and monkeys there is a correlation between discounting of reward and control of movements. We consider saccadic eye movements and hypothesize that duration of a movement is equivalent to a delay of reward. The hyperbolic cost of this delay not only accounts for kinematics of saccades in adults, it also accounts for the faster saccades of children, who temporally discount reward more steeply. Our theory explains why saccade velocities increase when reward is elevated, and why disorders in the encoding of reward, for example in Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia, produce changes in saccade. We show that delay of reward elevates the cost of saccades, reducing velocities. Finally, we consider coordinated movements that include motion of eyes and head and find that their kinematics is also consistent with a hyperbolic, reward-dependent cost of time. Therefore, each voluntary movement carries a cost because its duration delays acquisition of reward. The cost depends on the value that the brain assigns to stimuli, and the rate at which it discounts this value in time. The motor commands that move our eyes reflect this cost of time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20685993      PMCID: PMC2926660          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1343-10.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  72 in total

1.  Eye-hand coordination: saccades are faster when accompanied by a coordinated arm movement.

Authors:  Lawrence H Snyder; Jeffrey L Calton; Anthony R Dickinson; Bonnie M Lawrence
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Contextual control of delay discounting by pathological gamblers.

Authors:  Mark R Dixon; Eric A Jacobs; Scott Sanders
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2006

4.  Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization.

Authors:  Jun Izawa; Tushar Rane; Opher Donchin; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Testosterone levels and discounting delayed monetary gains and losses in male humans.

Authors:  Taiki Takahashi; Kikue Sakaguchi; Mariko Oki; Seijiro Homma; Toshikazu Hasegawa
Journal:  Neuro Endocrinol Lett       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.765

6.  Neuropsychological function and delay discounting in methamphetamine-dependent individuals.

Authors:  William F Hoffman; Meredith Moore; Raymond Templin; Bentson McFarland; Robert J Hitzemann; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Quantitative analysis of ocular movements in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  T Nakamura; R Kanayama; R Sano; M Ohki; Y Kimura; M Aoyagi; Y Koike
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1991

8.  Delay and probability discounting as related to different stages of adolescent smoking and non-smoking.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds; Katherine Karraker; Kimberly Horn; Jerry B. Richards
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls.

Authors:  Kris N Kirby; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 10.  Glutamate and dopamine dysregulation in schizophrenia--a synthesis and selective review.

Authors:  James M Stone; Paul D Morrison; Lyn S Pilowsky
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 4.153

View more
  66 in total

1.  Dynamic integration of information about salience and value for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Alexander C Schütz; Julia Trommershäuser; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  From movement to thought: executive function, embodied cognition, and the cerebellum.

Authors:  Leonard F Koziol; Deborah Ely Budding; Dana Chidekel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Motor control is decision-making.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Vigor of movements and the cost of time in decision making.

Authors:  Jennie E S Choi; Pavan A Vaswani; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Explicit knowledge enhances motor vigor and performance: motivation versus practice in sequence tasks.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Martin A Lindquist; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Timing in talking: what is it used for, and how is it controlled?

Authors:  Alice Turk; Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Distinct neural circuits for control of movement vs. holding still.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Control of movement vigor and decision making during foraging.

Authors:  Tehrim Yoon; Robert B Geary; Alaa A Ahmed; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Limited encoding of effort by dopamine neurons in a cost-benefit trade-off task.

Authors:  Benjamin Pasquereau; Robert S Turner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Modulation of neural activity by reward in medial intraparietal cortex is sensitive to temporal sequence of reward.

Authors:  Rishi Rajalingham; Richard Greg Stacey; Georgios Tsoulfas; Sam Musallam
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.