Literature DB >> 21419453

Lymphadenectomy improves survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma and nodal metastases.

Jared M Whitson1, Catherine R Harris, Adam C Reese, Maxwell V Meng.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In a population based cohort we determined whether an increase in the number of lymph nodes removed is associated with improved disease specific survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with nephrectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database with renal cell carcinoma and no evidence of distant metastases were identified. Those patients included in the study underwent radical or partial nephrectomy with lymphadenectomy. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with disease specific survival including an interaction between lymph node status and the number of lymph nodes removed.
RESULTS: Between 1988 and 2006, 9,586 patients with renal cell carcinoma met the study inclusion criteria. Median followup was 3.5 years (range 1.4 to 6.8). Of the patients 2,382 (25%) died of renal cell carcinoma, including 1,646 (20%) with lymph node negative disease and 736 (58%) with lymph node positive disease. There was no effect on disease specific survival with increasing the extent of lymphadenectomy in patients with negative lymph nodes (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.1, p = 0.93). However, patients with positive lymph nodes had increased disease specific survival with extent of lymphadenectomy (HR 0.8 per 10 lymph nodes removed, 95% CI 0.7-1.0, p = 0.04). An increase of 10 lymph nodes in a patient with 1 positive lymph node was associated with a 10% absolute increase in disease specific survival at 5 years (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows an association between increased lymph node yield and improved disease specific survival of patients with lymph node positive nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma who underwent lymphadenectomy. Patients at high risk for nodal disease should be considered for regional or extended lymphadenectomy. Clinical variables to predict risk and validation of dissection templates are important areas for future research.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21419453     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

Review 1.  The survival benefit of lymph node dissection at the time of removal of kidney, prostate and urothelial carcinomas: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Karim Bensalah; Morgan Roupret; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  The role of lymphadenectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Glen W Barrisford; Boris Gershman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Trends and outcomes of lymphadenectomy for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score-weighted analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Nicholas J Farber; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Sinae Kim; Brian Shinder; Kushan Radadia; Joshua Sterling; Parth K Modi; Sharad Goyal; Rahul Parikh; Tina M Mayer; Robert E Weiss; Isaac Y Kim; Sammy E Elsamra; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Accuracy of clinical nodal staging and factors associated with receipt of lymph node dissection at the time of surgery for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kushan D Radadia; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Sinae Kim; Nicholas J Farber; Joshua Sterling; Marissa Falkiewicz; Parth K Modi; Sharad Goyal; Rahul Parikh; Robert E Weiss; Isaac Y Kim; Sammy E Elsamra; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 5.  Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Critical Evaluation.

Authors:  Aristotle Bamias; Bernard Escudier; Cora N Sternberg; Flora Zagouri; Athanasios Dellis; Bob Djavan; Kimon Tzannis; Loukas Kontovinis; Konstantinos Stravodimos; Athanasios Papatsoris; Dionysios Mitropoulos; Charalampos Deliveliotis; Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos; Constantine A Constantinides
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-06-07

6.  Role of RPLND and Metastasectomy in the Management of Oligometastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  H Nagaraja; N Srivatsa; S Hemalatha; S Shweta; S K Raghunath
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-02-05

Review 7.  The rationale and the role of lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  The contemporary role of lymph node dissection in the management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Piotr Zareba; Jehonathan H Pinthus; Paul Russo
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-08-20

Review 9.  Management of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus in locally advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah P Psutka; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-08

10.  Lymphadenopathies in patients with renal cell carcinoma: clinical and pathological predictors of pathologically confirmed lymph node invasion.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Federico Deho'; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Alessandro Larcher; Paolo Capogrosso; Alessandro Nini; Cristina Carenzi; Massimo Freschi; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Salonia; Francesco Montorsi; Roberto Bertini
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.