Literature DB >> 21417501

The role of computerized decision support in reducing errors in selecting medicines for prescription: narrative review.

Melissa T Baysari1, Johanna Westbrook, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Richard O Day.   

Abstract

This narrative review includes a summary of research examining prescribing errors, prescription decision making and the role computerized decision support plays in this decision-making process. A reduction in medication prescribing errors, specifically a reduction in the selection of inappropriate medications, is expected to result from the implementation of an effective computerized decision support system. Previous research has investigated the impact of the implementation of electronic systems on medication errors more broadly. This review examines the specific characteristics of decision support systems that may contribute to fewer knowledge-based mistakes in prescribing, and critically appraises the large volume of information available on the decision-making process of selecting medicines for prescription. The results highlight a need for work investigating what decision strategies are used by doctors with different levels of expertise in the prescribing of medications. The nature of the relationship between decision support and decision performance is not well understood and future research is needed to determine the mechanisms by which computerized decision support influences medication selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21417501     DOI: 10.2165/11588200-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  83 in total

1.  Prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: their incidence and clinical significance.

Authors:  B Dean; M Schachter; C Vincent; N Barber
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

2.  The effects of electronic prescribing on the quality of prescribing.

Authors:  Parastou Donyai; Kara O'Grady; Ann Jacklin; Nick Barber; Bryony Dean Franklin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  D L Hunt; R B Haynes; S E Hanna; K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Medication prescribing errors in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  T S Lesar; L L Briceland; K Delcoure; J C Parmalee; V Masta-Gornic; H Pohl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Prescribing influences: an overview.

Authors:  D B Worthen
Journal:  Br J Med Educ       Date:  1973-06

Review 6.  Evaluating informatics applications--some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism.

Authors:  B Kaplan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Why do interns make prescribing errors? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Ian D Coombes; Danielle A Stowasser; Judith A Coombes; Charles Mitchell
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Learning from error: identifying contributory causes of medication errors in an Australian hospital.

Authors:  Pamela Nichols; Tandy-Sue Copeland; Ian A Craib; Paul Hopkins; David G Bruce
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Drug choice as a problem-solving process.

Authors:  R Segal; C D Hepler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 10.  The causes of and factors associated with prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mary P Tully; Darren M Ashcroft; Tim Dornan; Penny J Lewis; David Taylor; Val Wass
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

View more
  7 in total

1.  Primary care providers' use of pharmacist support for delivery of pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Jivan Moaddeb; Nancy Allen LaPointe; Alex Cho; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 2.  Computerized clinical decision support for medication prescribing and utilization in pediatrics.

Authors:  Jeremy S Stultz; Milap C Nahata
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  'Too much, too late': mixed methods multi-channel video recording study of computerized decision support systems and GP prescribing.

Authors:  James Hayward; Fionagh Thomson; Heather Milne; Susan Buckingham; Aziz Sheikh; Bernard Fernando; Kathrin Cresswell; Robin Williams; Hilary Pinnock
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Polypharmacy and risk of antiretroviral drug interactions among the aging HIV-infected population.

Authors:  Carol Holtzman; Carl Armon; Ellen Tedaldi; Joan S Chmiel; Kate Buchacz; Kathleen Wood; John T Brooks
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Systematic review of predictive risk models for adverse drug events in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Nazanin Falconer; Michael Barras; Neil Cottrell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Effects of two commercial electronic prescribing systems on prescribing error rates in hospital in-patients: a before and after study.

Authors:  Johanna I Westbrook; Margaret Reckmann; Ling Li; William B Runciman; Rosemary Burke; Connie Lo; Melissa T Baysari; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Richard O Day
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Prescription errors in cancer chemotherapy: Omissions supersede potentially harmful errors.

Authors:  Jayanthi Mathaiyan; Tanvi Jain; Biswajit Dubashi; K Satyanarayana Reddy; Gitanjali Batmanabane
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.