Literature DB >> 21415758

Reflex fluorescent in situ hybridization testing for unsuccessful product of conception cultures: a retrospective analysis of 5555 samples attempted by conventional cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization.

Brandon M Shearer1, Erik C Thorland, Austin W Carlson, Syed M Jalal, Rhett P Ketterling.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of chromosome analysis on products of conception from spontaneous abortions is recommended to identify a genetic etiology. However, 20% of products of conception cultures are unsuccessful due to microbial contamination or lack of viable dividing cells. Our laboratory implemented a reflex fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assay to detect numeric chromosome abnormalities for unsuccessful cultures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All products of conception samples were simultaneously processed for both chromosome analysis and FISH analysis. If the chromosome analysis was unsuccessful, interphase FISH was performed for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X, and Y. To assess the performance of the FISH assay, a 3-year retrospective comparative analysis of the FISH results versus chromosome results was performed.
RESULTS: Of 5555 total specimens, 4189 (75%) represented chorionic villi/fetal tissue and 1366 (25%) represented tissue of unidentified origin. Of the 1189 tissues of unidentified origin with chromosome or FISH results, 1096 (92%) were XX, indicating that the majority of these tissues are likely maternal in origin. Of the 3361 successful chromosome studies on the chorionic villi/fetal tissue specimens, 1734 (52%) samples had a chromosome abnormality. Of the 762 successful FISH studies on chorionic villi/fetal tissue specimens that were unsuccessful by chromosome studies, 181 (25%) had an abnormal result with the targeted FISH panel. Overall, the FISH panel detected approximately 70% of the chromosome abnormalities in products of conception detectable by karyotype. When the FISH panel results were combined with chromosome analysis for the 4189 chorionic villi/fetal tissue specimens, the overall abnormality rate is 47%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our reflex FISH assay proved useful for the detection of common chromosome aneuploidies in products of conception samples that failed conventional chromosome analysis. Because of its limited view of the genome, cautious interpretation of FISH results is required for all samples, in particular, trisomy of an acrocentric chromosome, which may represent a Robertsonian translocation. An algorithmic approach to the genetic evaluation of products of conception specimens, with the potential for initial evaluation by a FISH panel, may be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21415758     DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31820c685b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  17 in total

1.  Chromosomal abnormalities in products of conception of first-trimester miscarriages detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis: a review of 1000 cases.

Authors:  Larysa Y Pylyp; Lyudmyla O Spynenko; Nataliya V Verhoglyad; Anna O Mishenko; Dmytro O Mykytenko; Valery D Zukin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Correlation analysis between ultrasound findings and abnormal karyotypes in the embryos from early pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Authors:  Xihong Li; Yan Ouyang; Yan Yi; Yueqiu Tan; Guangxiu Lu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  1(st) trimester miscarriage: four decades of study.

Authors:  Kathy Hardy; Philip John Hardy
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2015-04

4.  Comprehensive analysis of 204 sporadic hydatidiform moles: revisiting risk factors and their correlations with the molar genotypes.

Authors:  Yassemine Khawajkie; Nawel Mechtouf; Ngoc Minh Phuong Nguyen; Kurosh Rahimi; Magali Breguet; Jocelyne Arseneau; Brigitte M Ronnett; Lori Hoffner; Felicia Lazure; Marjolaine Arnaud; Fabrice Peers; Liane Tan; Basam Abu Rafea; Monica Aguinaga; Neil S Horowitz; Asangla Ao; Seang Lin Tan; Richard Brown; William Buckett; Urvashi Surti; Karine Hovanes; Trilochan Sahoo; Philippe Sauthier; Rima Slim
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges.

Authors:  Trilochan Sahoo; Natasa Dzidic; Michelle N Strecker; Sara Commander; Mary K Travis; Charles Doherty; R Weslie Tyson; Arturo E Mendoza; Mary Stephenson; Craig A Dise; Carlos W Benito; Mandolin S Ziadie; Karine Hovanes
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Copy number variation sequencing combined with quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction in clinical application of pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Li Wang; Feng Tang; Yang Zeng; Daishu Yin; Cong Zhou; Hongmei Zhu; Linping Li; Lili Zhang; Jing Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 3.357

7.  Double and multiple chromosomal aneuploidies in spontaneous abortions: A single institutional experience.

Authors:  Shivakumar Subramaniyam; Venkat R Pulijaal; Susan Mathew
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

8.  Aneusomy detection with Karyolite-Bac on Beads® is a cost-efficient and high throughput strategy in the molecular analyses of the early pregnancy conception losses.

Authors:  Javier Pérez-Durán; Zenyese Nájera; Yanelly Trujillo-Cabrera; Mónica Martín-Saro; Ethel García-Latorre; Jaime Escarcega-Preciado; Nayelli Nájera; Teresa Martínez-Galaviz; Gloria Queipo
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Chromosome aberrations in a large series of spontaneous miscarriages in the German population and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jutta Jenderny
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Two-year outcome after recurrent first trimester miscarriages: prognostic value of the past obstetric history.

Authors:  Christiane Kling; Julia Magez; Jürgen Hedderich; Sören von Otte; Dieter Kabelitz
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.