Literature DB >> 21415683

Acetabular morphology in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Wudbhav N Sankar1, Brian K Brighton, Young-Jo Kim, Michael B Millis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) often appear to have overcoverage of their contralateral (normal) side. This increased coverage can be a contributing factor to femoroacetabular impingement. The purpose of this study was to quantify the coverage of the normal hip in patients with unilateral SCFE and to compare our results to matched controls.
METHODS: Between 2003 and 2008, we identified 50 patients treated for unilateral, stable SCFE by in-situ screw fixation. Using postoperative anteroposterior and frog radiographs of the pelvis, the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and Tönnis angle (TA) were measured on the uninvolved side. Pelvic tilt was evaluated to ensure the quality of the radiographs, and in those patients with appropriate films, the presence or absence of a posterior wall sign and cross-over sign was noted. Results were compared with 50 age and sex-matched controls. Control data was generated from scout views of otherwise healthy patients who underwent an abdominal computed tomography scan to rule out acute appendicitis.
RESULTS: The mean LCEA and TA of the contralateral acetabulum were 33 and 5 degrees, respectively (range: 18 to 47; -7 to 13). Seventy-eight percent had a positive cross-over sign and 39% had a posterior wall sign. In comparison, the mean LCEA and TA in our control group were 20 and 8 degrees, respectively (range: 8 to 35; -6 to 23). In this group, 21% had a positive cross-over sign whereas 15% had a positive posterior wall sign. We found a significantly higher LCEA and lower TA in the study population compared with controls (P=1.6E-16, 0.0003), as well as a higher prevalence of retroversion signs (P=5E-7, 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The contralateral acetabulum in patients with treated unilateral SCFE demonstrates significantly more coverage compared with matched controls. In addition, there is a significantly higher prevalence of acetabular retroversion in these patients. Our findings should alert caregivers to the potential of developing femoroacetabular impingement on the contralateral side in patients who have had a unilateral SCFE. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III (retrospective case-control).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21415683     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31820fcc81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  25 in total

1.  Multiplanar CT assessment of femoral head displacement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; Jerry R Dwek; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-06-23

2.  [Treatment of chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis : Use of dynamic epiphyseal telescopic screws].

Authors:  E Schumann; D Zajonz; M Wojan; F B Kübler; P Brandmaier; C Josten; C-E Heyde; U Bühligen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Is the acetabulum retroverted in slipped capital femoral epiphysis?

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; Venkatadass Krishnamoorthy; Bernd Bittersohl; James D Bomar; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Epiphyseolysis of the femoral head: new aspects of diagnostics and therapy].

Authors:  J F Funk; S Lebek
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Acetabular retroversion in post slipped capital femoral epiphysis deformity.

Authors:  Jeremy P Bauer; Dennis R Roy; Susan Sienko Thomas
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 6.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: prevalence, pathogenesis, and natural history.

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Michael B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The fate of hips that are not prophylactically pinned after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Yaser M K Baghdadi; A Noelle Larson; Rafael J Sierra; Hamlet A Peterson; Anthony A Stans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Increased acetabular depth may influence physeal stability in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  David A Podeszwa; David Gurd; Anthony Riccio; Adriana De La Rocha; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Hip impingement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a changing perspective.

Authors:  Harish S Hosalkar; Nirav K Pandya; James D Bomar; Dennis R Wenger
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement: does the offset decrease correlate with cartilage damage? A pilot study.

Authors:  Christoph Zilkens; Falk Miese; Rüdiger Krauspe; Bernd Bittersohl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.