Literature DB >> 21414594

Angioscopic and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound characteristics of culprit lesion morphology underlying coronary artery thrombosis.

Elias A Sanidas1, Akiko Maehara, Gary S Mintz, Toshikazu Kashiyama, Jun Guo, Jun Pu, Yunpeng Shang, Bimmer Claessen, George D Dangas, Martin B Leon, Jeffrey W Moses, Gregg W Stone, Yasunori Ueda.   

Abstract

Although rupture of vulnerable plaque with subsequent thrombosis is the most common mechanism of acute coronary syndromes, a significant percentage of patients with acute coronary syndrome may not have plaque rupture. We used angioscopy and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) to investigate the underlying morphology of coronary thrombosis. We correlated the angioscopic diagnosis of coronary thrombosis in 42 lesions (37 patients) with gray-scale and VH-IVUS findings of the underlying plaque. By angioscopy plaque rupture was present in 19 thrombotic lesions (45.2%), whereas 23 (54.8%) had no rupture. VH-IVUS findings comparing thrombotic lesions with to those without angioscopic plaque rupture were remarkably similar except that angioscopic nonruptures tended to have more necrotic core (NC) at the minimum lumen area site (22.2 ± 12.5% vs 16.3 ± 9.3%, p=0.09) and at the maximum NC site (32.7 ± 12.8% vs 25.0 ± 12.1%, p=0.053) compared to angioscopic ruptures. Furthermore, among 19 lesions with angioscopic plaque rupture, there were 11 VH thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFAs; 57.9%); among 23 lesions without angioscopic rupture, there were 17 VH-TCFAs (73.9%, p=0.22). In conclusion, the similarity of VH-IVUS plaque composition (percentage of NC and percentage of VH-TCFA) in lesions with or without angioscopic plaque rupture suggest a spectrum of underlying morphologies to explain thrombosis in the absence of a ruptured plaque including classic erosions, small (and undetectable) plaque ruptures, and potentially unruptured TCFAs with superimposed thrombosis.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21414594     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.12.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  New insights into the vulnerable plaque from imaging studies.

Authors:  Robert S Fenning; Robert L Wilensky
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Chronic kidney disease and coronary artery vulnerable plaques.

Authors:  Mitsuru Wada; Yasunori Ueda; Tomoaki Higo; Koshi Matsuo; Mayu Nishio; Akio Hirata; Mitsutoshi Asai; Takayoshi Nemoto; Toshikazu Kashiyama; Ayaka Murakami; Kazunori Kashiwase; Kazuhisa Kodama
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Multimodality Intravascular Imaging Assessment of Plaque Erosion versus Plaque Rupture in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Jee Eun Kwon; Wang Soo Lee; Gary S Mintz; Young Joon Hong; Sung Yun Lee; Ki Seok Kim; Joo-Yong Hahn; Kaup Sharath Kumar; Hoyoun Won; Seong Hyeop Hyeon; Seung Yong Shin; Kwang Je Lee; Tae Ho Kim; Chee Jeong Kim; Sang Wook Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  Effect of folic acid supplementation on levels of circulating Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 and the presence of intravascular ultrasound derived virtual histology thin-cap fibroatheromas in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Kjetil H Løland; Øyvind Bleie; Elin Strand; Per M Ueland; Jan E Nordrehaug; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Patrick W Serruys; Ottar Nygård
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  New methods to image unstable atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Jack P M Andrews; Zahi A Fayad; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.162

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.