| Literature DB >> 27482258 |
Jee Eun Kwon1, Wang Soo Lee1, Gary S Mintz2, Young Joon Hong3, Sung Yun Lee4, Ki Seok Kim5, Joo-Yong Hahn6, Kaup Sharath Kumar1, Hoyoun Won1, Seong Hyeop Hyeon1, Seung Yong Shin1, Kwang Je Lee1, Tae Ho Kim1, Chee Jeong Kim1, Sang Wook Kim1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We assessed plaque erosion of culprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome in real world practice. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Culprit lesion plaque rupture or plaque erosion was diagnosed with optical coherence tomography (OCT). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used to determine arterial remodeling. Positive remodeling was defined as a remodeling index (lesion/reference EEM [external elastic membrane area) >1.05.Entities:
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Atherosclerotic plaque; Optical coherence tomography
Year: 2016 PMID: 27482258 PMCID: PMC4965428 DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.4.499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean Circ J ISSN: 1738-5520 Impact factor: 3.243
Baseline characteristics
| Plaque rupture (n=90) | Plaque erosion (n=43) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 60.11±12.51 | 61.98±9.99 | 0.3938 |
| Female gender | 17 (18.9) | 7 (16.3) | 0.7143 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 20 (22.2) | 12 (27.9) | 0.4731 |
| Hypertension | 37 (41.1) | 21 (48.8) | 0.4007 |
| Current smoker | 39 (43.3) | 15 (34.9) | 0.6458 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 9 (10.1) | 4 (9.3) | 0.8836 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 187.3±41.5 | 179.7±47.49 | 0.3521 |
| Clinical presentation | <0.0001 | ||
| Unstable angina | 13 (14.5) | 17 (39) | |
| NSTEMI | 13 (14.5) | 11 (26) | |
| STEMI | 64 (71) | 15 (35) | |
| Diseased vessels | 0.5322 | ||
| 1 vessel | 33 (36.7) | 11 (34.4) | |
| 2 vessel | 33 (36.7) | 15 (46.9) | |
| 3 vessel | 24 (26.7) | 6 (18.8) | |
| Target lesion | 0.4281 | ||
| LAD | 47 (52.2) | 27 (64.3) | |
| LCX | 9 (10.0) | 3 (7.14) | |
| RCA | 34 (37.9) | 12 (28.6) | |
| Quantitative coronary angiography | |||
| Lesion length (mm) | 17.98±7.03 | 2.26±1.15 | <0.0001 |
| Diameter stenosis | 81.0±19.3 | 17.5±14.2 | <0.0001 |
| Reference vessel diameter (mm) | 3.47±0.61 | 2.98±0.97 | 0.0047 |
| TIMI grade | <0.0001 | ||
| 0 | 44 (48.9) | 4 (9.3) | |
| 1 | 2 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) | |
| 2 | 23 (25.6) | 6 (13.9) | |
| 3 | 21 (23.3) | 33 (76.7) |
Values are presented as means±standard deviation or n (%). NSTEMI: non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI: ST elevation myocardial infarction, LAD: left anterior descending artery, LCX: left circumflex artery, RCA: right coronary artery, TIMI: thrombolysis in myocardial infarction
IVUS comparison of plaque rupture sites versus plaque erosion sites
| Plaque rupture (n=90) | Plaque erosion (n=43) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proximal reference segment | |||
| EEM area (mm2) | 18.66±5.33 | 16.43±4.95 | 0.0286 |
| Lumen area (mm2) | 9.36±2.91 | 8.77±3.28 | 0.3100 |
| Plaque area (mm2) | 10.09±6.66 | 7.84±3.06 | 0.0466 |
| Rupture vs. erosion sites | |||
| EEM (mm2) | 17.68±5.93 | 15.07±7.48 | 0.0359 |
| Lumen area (mm2) | 6.08±2.85 | 7.02±3.29 | 0.1100 |
| Plaque area (mm2) | 11.61±4.60 | 7.29±3.38 | <0.0001 |
| Plaque burden (%) | 65.1±12.15 | 50.50±16.63 | <0.0001 |
| Fibrotic area (mm2) | 4.57±2.39 | 2.42±1.9 | <0.0001 |
| Fibrofatty area (mm2) | 1.13±1.42 | 0.72±0.94 | 0.0576 |
| Necrotic core area (mm2) | 2.11±1.38 | 0.90±1.00 | <0.0001 |
| Dense calcium area (mm2) | 0.67±0.76 | 0.36±0.62 | 0.0287 |
| % Fibrotic area | 55.03±13.65 | 71.73±105.9 | 0.1400 |
| % Fibrofatty area | 11.98±11.76 | 15.23±16.51 | 0.2700 |
| % Necrotic core area | 24.74±11.07 | 15.06±12.47 | <0.0001 |
| % Dense calcium area | 8.24±8.96 | 6.34±10.18 | 0.2900 |
| Remodeling Index | 1.12±0.29 | 0.94±0.36 | 0.0050 |
| Remodeling | 0.0030 | ||
| Positive | 52 (57.7) | 14 (32.5) | |
| Intermediate | 15 (16.6) | 4 (9.3) | |
| Negative | 23 (25.5) | 25 (58.1) | |
| Distal reference segment | |||
| EEM area (mm2) | 13.75±5.75 | 12.83±4.63 | 0.3743 |
| Lumen area (mm2) | 7.54±3.20 | 7.17±2.82 | 0.5332 |
| Plaque area (mm2) | 6.74±4.18 | 5.67±2.85 | 0.0961 |
Values are presented as means±standard deviation or n (%). IVUS: intravascular ultrasound, EEM: external elastic membrane area
Fig. 1Optical coherence tomography finding of plaque erosion. (A-C) Definite plaque erosion, intracoronary thrombi (arrow) attaching to the luminal surface were noted without detectable signs of fibrous cap rupture. (D) Probable plaque erosion, coronary luminal surface irregularity (arrow) with the absence of thrombus was noted at the culprit lesion.
Comparative findings of OCT in plaque rupture and plaque erosion
| Plaque rupture (n=90) | Plaque erosion (n=43) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plaque component | <0.0001 | ||
| Fibrotic | 4 (4.4) | 26 (60) | |
| Lipidic | 26 (28.8) | 5 (11.6) | |
| Fibrocalcific | 12 (13.3) | 7 (16) | |
| Thick cap fibroatheroma | 1 (1.1) | 5 (11.6) | |
| Thin-capped fibroatheroma | 47 (52) | 0 | |
| Thrombus | <0.0001 | ||
| White thrombus | 7 (8) | 24 (55.8) | |
| Red thrombus | 83 (92) | 12 (27.9) | |
| No thrombus | 0 | 7 (16.3) |
Values are presented as n (%). OCT: optical coherence tomography
Fig. 2Frequency distribution of plaque rupture/erosion at culprit according to distance from each coronary ostium of the LAD, the LCX, and the RCA. Plaque rupture and plaque erosions are shown separately. The distribution pattern of plaque rupture was similar (p=0.29) to that of plaque erosions. LAD: left anterior descending coronary artery, LCX: left circumflex coronary artery, RCA: right coronary artery.