Literature DB >> 21414480

Modeling the cell cycle: why do certain circuits oscillate?

James E Ferrell1, Tony Yu-Chen Tsai, Qiong Yang.   

Abstract

Computational modeling and the theory of nonlinear dynamical systems allow one to not simply describe the events of the cell cycle, but also to understand why these events occur, just as the theory of gravitation allows one to understand why cannonballs fly in parabolic arcs. The simplest examples of the eukaryotic cell cycle operate like autonomous oscillators. Here, we present the basic theory of oscillatory biochemical circuits in the context of the Xenopus embryonic cell cycle. We examine Boolean models, delay differential equation models, and especially ordinary differential equation (ODE) models. For ODE models, we explore what it takes to get oscillations out of two simple types of circuits (negative feedback loops and coupled positive and negative feedback loops). Finally, we review the procedures of linear stability analysis, which allow one to determine whether a given ODE model and a particular set of kinetic parameters will produce oscillations.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21414480     DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  111 in total

1.  Spatial positive feedback at the onset of mitosis.

Authors:  Silvia D M Santos; Roy Wollman; Tobias Meyer; James E Ferrell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Enzyme localization, crowding, and buffers collectively modulate diffusion-influenced signal transduction: Insights from continuum diffusion modeling.

Authors:  Peter M Kekenes-Huskey; Changsun Eun; J A McCammon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Design principles for robust oscillatory behavior.

Authors:  Sebastian M Castillo-Hair; Elizabeth R Villota; Alberto M Coronado
Journal:  Syst Synth Biol       Date:  2015-08-05

4.  Interaction of E2F7 transcription factor with E2F1 and C-terminal-binding protein (CtBP) provides a mechanism for E2F7-dependent transcription repression.

Authors:  Beiyu Liu; Igor Shats; Steven P Angus; Michael L Gatza; Joseph R Nevins
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Cell cycle proliferation decisions: the impact of single cell analyses.

Authors:  Jacob P Matson; Jeanette G Cook
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.542

6.  Mutation-induced protein interaction kinetics changes affect apoptotic network dynamic properties and facilitate oncogenesis.

Authors:  Linjie Zhao; Tanlin Sun; Jianfeng Pei; Qi Ouyang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Network calisthenics: control of E2F dynamics in cell cycle entry.

Authors:  Jeffrey V Wong; Peng Dong; Joseph R Nevins; Bernard Mathey-Prevot; Lingchong You
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 8.  Diverse array-designed modes of combination therapies in Fangjiomics.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Zhong Wang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Rational design of functional and tunable oscillating enzymatic networks.

Authors:  Sergey N Semenov; Albert S Y Wong; R Martijn van der Made; Sjoerd G J Postma; Joost Groen; Hendrik W H van Roekel; Tom F A de Greef; Wilhelm T S Huck
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 24.427

10.  Differential Scaling of Gene Expression with Cell Size May Explain Size Control in Budding Yeast.

Authors:  Yuping Chen; Gang Zhao; Jakub Zahumensky; Sangeet Honey; Bruce Futcher
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.