Literature DB >> 21414339

Differential impact of partial cortical blindness on gaze strategies when sitting and walking - an immersive virtual reality study.

Dana B Iorizzo1, Meghan E Riley, Mary Hayhoe, Krystel R Huxlin.   

Abstract

The present experiments aimed to characterize the visual performance of subjects with long-standing, unilateral cortical blindness when walking in a naturalistic, virtual environment. Under static, seated testing conditions, cortically blind subjects are known to exhibit compensatory eye movement strategies. However, they still complain of significant impairment in visual detection during navigation. To assess whether this is due to a change in compensatory eye movement strategy between sitting and walking, we measured eye and head movements in subjects asked to detect peripherally-presented, moving basketballs. When seated, cortically blind subjects detected ∼80% of balls, while controls detected almost all balls. Seated blind subjects did not make larger head movements than controls, but they consistently biased their fixation distribution towards their blind hemifield. When walking, head movements were similar in the two groups, but the fixation bias decreased to the point that fixation distribution in cortically blind subjects became similar to that in controls - with one major exception: at the time of basketball appearance, walking controls looked primarily at the far ground, in upper quadrants of the virtual field of view; cortically blind subjects looked significantly more at the near ground, in lower quadrants of the virtual field. Cortically blind subjects detected only 58% of the balls when walking while controls detected ∼90%. Thus, the adaptive gaze strategies adopted by cortically blind individuals as a compensation for their visual loss are strongest and most effective when seated and stationary. Walking significantly alters these gaze strategies in a way that seems to favor walking performance, but impairs peripheral target detection. It is possible that this impairment underlies the experienced difficulty of those with cortical blindness when navigating in real life.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21414339      PMCID: PMC3093191          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  38 in total

1.  Is optic flow used to guide walking while wearing a displacing prism?

Authors:  M G Harris; G Carré
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Visual function in patients with homonymous hemianopial II. Oculomotor mechanisms.

Authors:  M M GASSEL; D WILLIAMS
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Visual impairment and the useful field of vision.

Authors:  Susan J Leat; Jan Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Visual searching in normal and brain-damaged subjects (contribution to the study of unilateral inattention).

Authors:  F Chédru; M Leblanc; F Lhermitte
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases.

Authors:  X Zhang; S Kedar; M J Lynn; N J Newman; V Biousse
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Visual search and visual target detection in patients with infarctions of the left or right posterior or the right middle brain artery.

Authors:  H Hildebrandt; H Giesselmann; W Sachsenheimer
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.475

7.  Saccadic eye movement strategies in patients with homonymous hemianopia.

Authors:  O Meienberg; W H Zangemeister; M Rosenberg; W F Hoyt; L Stark
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Aaron J Mandel; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Cognitive and vision loss affects the topography of the attentional visual field.

Authors:  Shirin E Hassan; Kathleen A Turano; Beatriz Muñoz; Cynthia Munro; Karen Bandeen Roche; Sheila K West
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Eye-head coordination for the steering of locomotion in humans: an anticipatory synergy.

Authors:  R Grasso; P Prévost; Y P Ivanenko; A Berthoz
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1998-09-04       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  16 in total

1.  Real-time recording and classification of eye movements in an immersive virtual environment.

Authors:  Gabriel Diaz; Joseph Cooper; Dmitry Kit; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Field Expansion for Acquired Monocular Vision Using a Multiplexing Prism.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Jung; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Asymmetry in the Collision Judgments of People With Homonymous Field Defects and Left Hemispatial Neglect.

Authors:  Kevin E Houston; Russell L Woods; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli; Gang Luo; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Driving with hemianopia: III. Detection of stationary and approaching pedestrians in a simulator.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Eli Peli; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Egor Ananyev; Aaron J Mandel; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Measuring Pedestrian Collision Detection With Peripheral Field Loss and the Impact of Peripheral Prisms.

Authors:  Cheng Qiu; Jae-Hyun Jung; Merve Tuccar-Burak; Lauren Spano; Robert Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Homonymous Visual Field Loss and Its Impact on Visual Exploration: A Supermarket Study.

Authors:  Enkelejda Kasneci; Katrin Sippel; Martin Heister; Katrin Aehling; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Ulrich Schiefer; Elena Papageorgiou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Tunnel Vision Prismatic Field Expansion: Challenges and Requirements.

Authors:  Henry Apfelbaum; Eli Peli
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Considering Apical Scotomas, Confusion, and Diplopia When Prescribing Prisms for Homonymous Hemianopia.

Authors:  Henry L Apfelbaum; Nicole C Ross; Alex R Bowers; Eli Peli
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.