Literature DB >> 21414112

Electronic medical record system at an opioid agonist treatment programme: study design, pre-implementation results and post-implementation trends.

Steven Kritz1, Lawrence S Brown, Melissa Chu, Carlota John-Hull, Charles Madray, Roberto Zavala, Ben Louie.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Electronic medical record (EMR) systems are commonly included in health care reform discussions. However, their embrace by the health care community has been slow.
METHODS: At Addiction Research and Treatment Corporation, an outpatient opioid agonist treatment programme that also provides primary medical care, HIV medical care and case management, substance abuse counselling and vocational services, we studied the implementation of an EMR in the domains of quality, productivity, satisfaction, risk management and financial performance utilizing a prospective pre- and post-implementation study design.
RESULTS: This report details the research approach, pre-implementation findings for all five domains, analysis of the pre-implementation findings and some preliminary post-implementation results in the domains of quality and risk management. For quality, there was a highly statistically significant improvement in timely performance of annual medical assessments (P < 0.001) and annual multidiscipline assessments (P < 0.0001). For risk management, the number of events was not sufficient to perform valid statistical analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary findings in the domain of quality are very promising. Should the findings in the other domains prove to be positive, then the impetus to implement EMR in similar health care facilities will be advanced.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21414112      PMCID: PMC3539283          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01664.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  9 in total

1.  Computerized patient records benefit physician offices.

Authors:  A Bingham
Journal:  Healthc Financ Manage       Date:  1997-09

2.  Justifying the cost of a computer-based patient record.

Authors:  L A Kian; M W Stewart; C Bagby; J Robertson
Journal:  Healthc Financ Manage       Date:  1995-07

3.  Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.

Authors:  Antonios Likourezos; Donald B Chalfin; Daniel G Murphy; Barbara Sommer; Kelly Darcy; Steven J Davidson
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study.

Authors:  Lisa Pizziferri; Anne F Kittler; Lynn A Volk; Melissa M Honour; Sameer Gupta; Samuel Wang; Tiffany Wang; Margaret Lippincott; Qi Li; David W Bates
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians.

Authors:  Catherine M DesRoches; Eric G Campbell; Sowmya R Rao; Karen Donelan; Timothy G Ferris; Ashish Jha; Rainu Kaushal; Douglas E Levy; Sara Rosenbaum; Alexandra E Shields; David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Moving towards an electronic patient record: a survey to assess the needs of community family physicians.

Authors:  H R Strasberg; F Tudiver; A M Holbrook; G Geiger; K K Keshavjee; S Troyan
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

7.  A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care.

Authors:  Samuel J Wang; Blackford Middleton; Lisa A Prosser; Christiana G Bardon; Cynthia D Spurr; Patricia J Carchidi; Anne F Kittler; Robert C Goldszer; David G Fairchild; Andrew J Sussman; Gilad J Kuperman; David W Bates
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors.

Authors:  D W Bates; L L Leape; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; J M Teich; E Burdick; M Hickey; S Kleefield; B Shea; M Vander Vliet; D L Seger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The effects of an Electronic Medical Record on patient care: clinician attitudes in a large HMO.

Authors:  P D Marshall; H L Chin
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998
  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Value of Electronic Health Records Since the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shikha Modi; Sue S Feldman
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-09-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.