Literature DB >> 21414027

Major limitations of randomized clinical trials involving coronary artery bifurcation interventions: time for redesigning clinical trials by involving only true bifurcation lesions and using appropriate bifurcation classification.

Mohammad Reza Movahed1.   

Abstract

Coronary bifurcation lesion intervention is technically challenging with higher complication rates. Many coronary interventional trials have been conducted involving coronary bifurcation lesions in order to compare one-stent with two-stent techniques. However, these trials have major limitation by enrolling all bifurcation lesions, including low-risk lesions so-called not true bifurcation lesions. This manuscript discusses the importance of appropriate designing of clinical trials for evaluation of complex techniques in coronary bifurcation lesions. (J Interven Cardiol 2011;24:295-301). ©2011, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21414027     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00631.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  3 in total

1.  Efficacy of one- vs. two-stent implantation for coronary bifurcation lesions in diabetic patients utilizing AIR2 as an endpoint.

Authors:  Zhizhong Liu; Guozhen Jin; Yuzhen Qi; Shoujie Shan; Junjie Zhang; Fei Ye; Nailiang Tian; Jiupei Chen; Shaoliang Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Coronary bifurcation lesions: is less more?

Authors:  Johan Bennett; Christophe Dubois
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis demonstrates superiority of double-kissing crush in complex lesions.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Yaodong Ding; Jiaxin Yang; Kexin Wang; Wen Gao; Zhe Fang; Yujie Zhou; Hailong Ge
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 6.138

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.