Literature DB >> 2141352

Composite holographic associative recall model (CHARM) and blended memories in eyewitness testimony.

J Metcalfe1.   

Abstract

The idea that compositing or blending occurs in human episodic memory stems from two sources: (a) distributed memory models and (b) studies on the errors that occur in eyewitness testimony. These two traditions of research--theoretical and empirical--have been independent and distinct. Here, data from the eyewitness testimony paradigm are simulated by the distributed model CHARM (Composite Holographic Associative Recall Model). Of focal concern are Loftus's studies, which have been interpreted in favor of the blending hypothesis, and McCloskey and Zaragoza's studies, which have been interpreted as refuting Loftus's position. Both of these seemingly contradictory results, as well as recent findings with yes/no recognition, fall out of the model. Finally, the model predicts empirically found color shifts and provides specifications for when blends and memory impairments will and will not be expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2141352     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.119.2.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  11 in total

1.  Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it.

Authors:  Barbie J Huelser; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  False memories for compound words: role of working memory.

Authors:  Mark Tippens Reinitz; Sharon L Hannigan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

3.  Memory-conjunction errors: miscombination of stored stimulus features can produce illusions of memory.

Authors:  M T Reinitz; W J Lammers; B P Cochran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-01

4.  Memory for flip-flopping: detection and recollection of political contradictions.

Authors:  Adam L Putnam; Christopher N Wahlheim; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-10

5.  Reality monitoring of physically similar and conceptually related objects.

Authors:  L A Henkel; N Franklin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

6.  Retrieval processes that produce interference in modified forced-choice recognition tests.

Authors:  C C Chandler; G J Gargano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-03

7.  A context-change account of temporal distinctiveness.

Authors:  Brian M Siefke; Troy A Smith; Per B Sederberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

8.  Item-specific interference caused by cue-dependent forgetting.

Authors:  C C Chandler; G J Gargano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-11

9.  On predicting the future states of awareness for recognition of unrecallable items.

Authors:  Jason L Hicks; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

10.  Inducing resistance to the misinformation effect by means of reinforced self-affirmation: The importance of positive feedback.

Authors:  Malwina Szpitalak; Romuald Polczyk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.