Literature DB >> 1549060

Memory-conjunction errors: miscombination of stored stimulus features can produce illusions of memory.

M T Reinitz1, W J Lammers, B P Cochran.   

Abstract

We demonstrate that subjects will often claim to have previously seen a new stimulus if they have previously seen stimuli containing its component features. Memory for studied stimuli was measured using a "yes"/"no" recognition test. There were three types of test stimuli: target stimuli, which had been presented during study, conjunction stimuli, constructed by combining the features of separate study stimuli, and feature stimuli, in which studied stimulus features were combined with new, unstudied, features. For both nonsense words and faces, the subjects made many more false alarms for conjunction than for feature stimuli. Additional experiments demonstrated that the results were not due to physical similarity between study and test stimuli and that conjunction errors were much more common than feature errors in recall. The results demonstrate that features of stored stimuli maintain some independence in memory and can be incorrectly combined to produce recognition errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1549060     DOI: 10.3758/bf03208247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  Composites, compromises, and CHARM: what is the evidence for blend memory representations?

Authors:  J W Schooler; J W Tanaka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1991-03

2.  Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information.

Authors:  J L McClelland; D E Rumelhart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1985-06

3.  Recall of place on the page.

Authors:  E B Zechmeister; J McKillip
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  1972-10

4.  On the genesis of abstract ideas.

Authors:  M I Posner; S W Keele
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-07

5.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces.

Authors:  S Carey; R Diamond
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Memory for faces: encoding and retrieval operations.

Authors:  G L Wells; B Hryciw
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-07

7.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects.

Authors:  A Treisman; H Schmidt
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.

Authors:  E F Loftus; D G Miller; H J Burns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1978-01

9.  Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: some things are better left unsaid.

Authors:  J W Schooler; T Y Engstler-Schooler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise.

Authors:  R Diamond; S Carey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-06
View more
  31 in total

1.  Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory.

Authors:  D L Westerman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Age differences in accuracy and choosing in eyewitness identification and face recognition.

Authors:  J H Searcy; J C Bartlett; A Memon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

3.  Migration of objects and inferences across episodes.

Authors:  Sharon L Hannigan; Mark Tippens Reinitz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

4.  False memories for compound words: role of working memory.

Authors:  Mark Tippens Reinitz; Sharon L Hannigan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

5.  Memory conjunction errors for realistic faces are consistent with configural processing.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Yu Xi Peh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

6.  Effects of repetition on memory for pragmatic inferences.

Authors:  Kathleen B McDermott; Jason C K Chan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

7.  Familiarity from orthographic information: extensions of the recognition without identification effect.

Authors:  Marianne E Lloyd; Deanne L Westerman; Jeremy K Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

8.  Feature and conjunction effects in recognition memory: toward specifying familiarity for compound words.

Authors:  Todd C Jones; Alan S Brown; Paul Atchley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

9.  Metamemorial influences in recognition memory: pictorial encoding reduces conjunction errors.

Authors:  Marianne E Lloyd
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

10.  Age-related neural changes during memory conjunction errors.

Authors:  Kelly S Giovanello; Elizabeth A Kensinger; Alana T Wong; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.