Literature DB >> 21413112

Robot-assisted laparoscopic management of cardia carcinoma according to Siewert recommendations.

Alberto Patriti1, Graziano Ceccarelli, Cecilia Ceribelli, Alberto Bartoli, Alessandro Spaziani, Claudio Cisano, Silvia Cigliano, Luciano Casciola.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resection of cardia and upper gastric carcinoma is considered a demanding procedure in laparoscopic surgery. Robotics could aid laparoscopic dissection of the oesophago-gastric junction and oesophageal anastomosis, enlarging indications for a minimally invasive approach to these tumours.
METHODS: Data from 17 consecutive patients with histologically proved cardia carcinoma were collected in a prospective database to assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic robot-assisted radical surgery, using the four-arm da Vinci surgical system. The type of surgery was chosen according to Siewert recommendations. Outcome measures were conversion rate, intra- and post-operative morbidity and mortality, operative time, blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested and macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of resection margins.
RESULTS: Seventeen laparoscopic operations were completed without conversion (14 extended gastrectomies, two transhiatal distal oesophagectomies and one transthoracic distal oesophagectomy). Extended lymph node dissection and oesophago-jejunal anastomosis were successfully carried out using the da Vinci system. Mean operative time was 327.2 ± 93.4 min and blood loss 279 ± 199 ml. The mean number of nodes retrieved was 28 ± 9 and all resection margins were negative. There was no mortality and overall morbidity was acceptably low (41.1%). During a mean follow-up time of 20 months, four recurrences were recorded (two multivisceral, one to the lung and one nodal), with two recurrence-related deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical surgery of the oesophago-gastric junction is feasible and safe. Longer follow-up time and randomized studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcome and advantages for the patient of this new technology.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21413112     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  8 in total

Review 1.  Robotic surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Terashima; Masanori Tokunaga; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taaichi Kawamura; Yuichiro Miki; Rie Makuuchi; Shinsaku Honda; Taichi Tatsubayashi; Wataru Takagi; Hayato Omori; Fumiko Hirata
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of short-term surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Weisong Shen; Hongqing Xi; Bo Wei; Jianxin Cui; Shibo Bian; Kecheng Zhang; Ning Wang; Xiaohui Huang; Lin Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Akio Kaito; Shizuki Sugita; Masahiro Watanabe; Hideki Sunagawa; Takahiro Kinoshita
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-06-02

Review 5.  A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Song Shen; Hong-Qing Xi; Lin Chen; Bo Wei
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Advanced applications of robotics in digestive surgery.

Authors:  Alberto Patriti; Pietro Addeo; Nicolas Buchs; Luciano Casciola; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2011-10-17

7.  Robotic versus open oncological gastric surgery in the elderly: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Maria Garbarino; Gianluca Costa; Barbara Frezza; Alessia Biancafarina; Genoveffa Balducci; Paolo Mercantini; Marco De Prizio; Giovanni Gugliemo Laracca; Graziano Ceccarelli
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-11-05

8.  Perioperative outcomes of robotic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer compared to a conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) technique.

Authors:  Zipu Yu; Qiong Xie; Lei Guo; Xin Chen; Chenyao Ni; Wenzong Luo; Weidong Li; Liang Ma
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.