Literature DB >> 21412810

Genotoxic effects of 3 T magnetic resonance imaging in cultured human lymphocytes.

Joong Won Lee1, Myeong Seong Kim, Yang Jee Kim, Young Joo Choi, Younghyun Lee, Hai Won Chung.   

Abstract

The clinical and preclinical use of high-field intensity (HF, 3 T and above) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners have significantly increased in the past few years. However, potential health risks are implied in the MRI and especially HF MRI environment due to high-static magnetic fields, fast gradient magnetic fields, and strong radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. In this study, the genotoxic potential of 3 T clinical MRI scans in cultured human lymphocytes in vitro was investigated by analyzing chromosome aberrations (CA), micronuclei (MN), and single-cell gel electrophoresis. Human lymphocytes were exposed to electromagnetic fields generated during MRI scanning (clinical routine brain examination protocols: three-channel head coil) for 22, 45, 67, and 89 min. We observed a significant increase in the frequency of single-strand DNA breaks following exposure to a 3 T MRI. In addition, the frequency of both CAs and MN in exposed cells increased in a time-dependent manner. The frequencies of MN in lymphocytes exposed to complex electromagnetic fields for 0, 22, 45, 67, and 89 min were 9.67, 11.67, 14.67, 18.00, and 20.33 per 1000 cells, respectively. Similarly, the frequencies of CAs in lymphocytes exposed for 0, 45, 67, and 89 min were 1.33, 2.33, 3.67, and 4.67 per 200 cells, respectively. These results suggest that exposure to 3 T MRI induces genotoxic effects in human lymphocytes.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21412810     DOI: 10.1002/bem.20664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  18 in total

1.  The effect of 1.5 T cardiac magnetic resonance on human circulating leucocytes.

Authors:  William R Critchley; Anna Reid; Julie Morris; Josephine H Naish; John P Stone; Alexandra L Ball; Triin Major; David Clark; Nick Waldron; Christien Fortune; Jakub Lagan; Gavin A Lewis; Mark Ainslie; Erik B Schelbert; Daniel M Davis; Matthias Schmitt; James E Fildes; Christopher A Miller
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: an update on regulation, exposure assessment techniques, health risk evaluation, and surveillance.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Giorgio Virgili; F Ederica Mattei; Cristiano Biagini; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Francesco Campanella; Luigi Landini; Fabriziomaria Gobba; Alberto Modenese; Giulio Giovannetti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  In vitro analysis of the anti-inflammatory effect of inhomogeneous static magnetic field-exposure on human macrophages and lymphocytes.

Authors:  Cristian Vergallo; Luciana Dini; Zsuzsanna Szamosvölgyi; Bernardetta Anna Tenuzzo; Elisabetta Carata; Elisa Panzarini; János F László
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects.

Authors:  Martin L Pall
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.310

5.  Analysis of DNA Double-Strand Breaks and Cytotoxicity after 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Isolated Human Lymphocytes.

Authors:  Annika Reddig; Mahsa Fatahi; Björn Friebe; Karina Guttek; Roland Hartig; Frank Godenschweger; Dirk Roggenbuck; Jens Ricke; Dirk Reinhold; Oliver Speck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Ultrahigh field MRI in clinical neuroimmunology: a potential contribution to improved diagnostics and personalised disease management.

Authors:  Friedemann Paul; Jens Wuerfel; Tim Sinnecker; Joseph Kuchling; Petr Dusek; Jan Dörr; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 7.  Bioeffects of static magnetic fields: oxidative stress, genotoxic effects, and cancer studies.

Authors:  Soumaya Ghodbane; Aida Lahbib; Mohsen Sakly; Hafedh Abdelmelek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The role of the location of personal exposimeters on the human body in their use for assessing exposure to the electromagnetic field in the radiofrequency range 98-2450 MHz and compliance analysis: evaluation by virtual measurements.

Authors:  Krzysztof Gryz; Patryk Zradziński; Jolanta Karpowicz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Comments on potential health effects of MRI-induced DNA lesions: quality is more important to consider than quantity.

Authors:  M A Hill; P O'Neill; W G McKenna
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  The Effect of Contrast Enhanced Abdominopelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Expression and Methylation Level of ATM and AKT Genes.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Jalali; Hossein Mozdarani; Hossein Ghanaati
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 2.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.