Literature DB >> 21412003

Changes in the treatment concept for approximal caries from 1983 to 2009 in Norway.

S Vidnes-Kopperud1, A B Tveit, I Espelid.   

Abstract

The aim was to measure variations in threshold for operative treatment of approximal caries in permanent teeth and the use of restorative materials, compared with results from studies conducted in Norway in 1983 and 1995. In 2009, a precoded questionnaire was sent electronically to 3,654 dentists with E-mail addresses in the member register of the Norwegian Dental Association. The questions were related to caries, treatment strategies and choice of dental materials. Replies were obtained from 61% of the dentists after two reminders. Restorative treatment of approximal lesions confined to enamel, based on radiographic appearance, was proposed by 7% of the dentists, compared with 66% in 1983 and 18% in 1995. Younger dentists, significantly more often than older, would defer operative treatment of approximal lesions until the lesion was visible in dentine. While tunnel preparation most often was the preparation of choice in 1995 (47%), saucer-shaped preparation was most favoured in 2009 (69%). Tunnel preparation was only preferred by 4% of the dentists. Resin composite was the restorative material preferred by 95%, compared with 16% in 1995. The corresponding values for conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) were 1 versus 22%, for resin-modified GIC 1 versus 7%, and for a combination of GIC and resin composite 2 versus 22%. Compomer was preferred by 1% of the respondents. The authors conclude that treatment concepts for approximal caries have changed considerably during the last 26 years. In 2009, only 7% of dentists reported that they would treat approximal caries operatively before the lesion reached dentine.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21412003     DOI: 10.1159/000324810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  22 in total

1.  Need of non-operative caries treatment in 16-year-olds from Northern Norway.

Authors:  I D Jacobsen; C-G Crossner; H M Eriksen; I Espelid; C Ullbro
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2018-12-04

2.  Validation of the Spanish version of the "Questionnaire on the treatment of approximal and occlusal caries".

Authors:  Begoña Ruiz; Iván Urzúa; Rodrigo Cabello; Gonzalo Rodríguez; Ivar Espelid
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Managing caries: the need to close the gap between the evidence base and current practice.

Authors:  F Schwendicke; S Doméjean; D Ricketts; M Peters
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Pretreatment of natural caries lesions affects penetration depth of infiltrants in vitro.

Authors:  S Paris; V M Soviero; M Schuch; H Meyer-Lueckel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A novel classification system for assessment of approximal caries lesion progression in bitewing radiographs.

Authors:  Anna Senneby; Margareta Elfvin; Christina Stebring-Franzon; Madeleine Rohlin
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Caries Management by Risk Assessment: Results from a Practice-Based Research Network Study.

Authors:  Peter Rechmann; Benjamin W Chaffee; Beate M T Rechmann; John D B Featherstone
Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc       Date:  2019-01

7.  Agreement among dentists' restorative treatment planning thresholds for primary occlusal caries, primary proximal caries, and existing restorations: findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Tim J Heaven; Valeria V Gordan; Mark S Litaker; Jeffrey L Fellows; D Brad Rindal; Allen R Firestone; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Evidence for Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA®).

Authors:  J D B Featherstone; B W Chaffee
Journal:  Adv Dent Res       Date:  2018-02

9.  Variation in caries treatment proposals among dentists in Norway: the best interest of the child.

Authors:  A Rønneberg; A B Skaare; B Hofmann; I Espelid
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2017-07-26

10.  Dentist and practice characteristics associated with restorative treatment of enamel caries in permanent teeth: multiple-regression modeling of observational clinical data from the National Dental PBRN.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Fellows; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert; D Brad Rindal; Vibeke Qvist; Mark S Litaker; Paul Benjamin; Håkan Flink; Daniel J Pihlstrom; Neil Johnson
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.