Literature DB >> 21409379

Use of the colonoscope training model with the colonoscope 3D imaging probe improved trainee colonoscopy performance: a pilot study.

Tonya Kaltenbach1, Cynthia Leung, Kuan Wu, Kelley Yan, Shai Friedland, Roy Soetikno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy insertion is difficult to teach due to the inability of current training models to provide realistic tactile sensation with simultaneous three-dimensional (3D) colonoscope display. AIMS: To assess the influence of a simulator consisting of a colon model coupled with 3D instrument visualization on trainee colonoscopy performance.
METHODS: Pilot study using the simulator model with three trainees who were not proficient in colonoscopy. At random times over a 6-week period, trainees participated in an individualized half-day session using the Colonoscope Training Model and a colonoscope equipped with a 3D magnetic probe imaging system (ScopeGuide) in six standardized cases. A blinded supervising instructor graded patient-based colonoscopy performance over the 6-week period, and we independently analyzed the 2-week period before and after the intervention. We also measured cecal intubation and withdrawal times and medication requirements.
RESULTS: Trainees performed 86 patient-based colonoscopies. Following the intervention, the colonoscopy performance score improved from 4.4 ± 2.3 to 5.9 ± 2.4 (p = 0.005). Trainees had a 76% cecal intubation rate following the session as compared to 43% before training (p = 0.004), while utilizing less time, 14 ± 7 versus 18 ± 11 min (p = 0.056) and less medication (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy simulation using the Colonoscope Training Model and the ScopeGuide produced an immediate and large effect on trainee colonoscopy performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21409379     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1614-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  12 in total

1.  Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S G Shah; J C Brooker; C B Williams; C Thapar; B P Saunders
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-11-18       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Robert E Sedlack; Joseph C Kolars
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Training with the compactEASIE biologic endoscopy simulator significantly improves hemostatic technical skill of gastroenterology fellows: a randomized controlled comparison with clinical endoscopy training alone.

Authors:  Juergen Hochberger; Kai Matthes; Juergen Maiss; Corinna Koebnick; Eckhart G Hahn; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction.

Authors:  Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; John L Petrini; Douglas K Rex; Michael A Safdi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Evidence-based assessment of endoscopic simulators for training.

Authors:  Lauren B Gerson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2006-07

6.  Simulators in competence assessment and credentialing: prospects and problems.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2006-07

7.  A call to action--measuring the quality of colonoscopy.

Authors:  David Lieberman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Training with a computer-based simulator achieves basic manual skills required for upper endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Emilio Di Giulio; Diego Fregonese; Tino Casetti; Renzo Cestari; Fausto Chilovi; Giancarlo D'Ambra; Giovanni Di Matteo; Leonardo Ficano; Gianfranco Delle Fave
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?

Authors:  C J A Bowles; R Leicester; C Romaya; E Swarbrick; C B Williams; O Epstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality simulator training: transfer to live patients.

Authors:  Jason Park; Helen MacRae; Laura J Musselman; Peter Rossos; Stanley J Hamstra; Stephen Wolman; Richard K Reznick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopy and polyps-diagnostic and therapeutic advances in management.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Eric K Johnson; Bradley Champagne; Brad Davis; Sang Lee; David Rivadeneira; Howard Ross; Dana A Hayden; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Utilisation of magnets to enhance gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Imdadur Rahman; Praful Patel; Philip Boger; Mike Thomson; Nadeem Ahmad Afzal
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-25

3.  Development of a train-to-proficiency curriculum for the technical skills component of the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery exam.

Authors:  Susan Gearhart; Michael Marohn; Saowanee Ngamruengphong; Gina Adrales; Oluwafemi Owodunni; Kim Duncan; Emil Petrusa; Pamela Lipsett
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Magnetic imaging-assisted colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher W Teshima; Sergio Zepeda-Gómez; Suliman H AlShankiti; Gurpal S Sandha
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Computed tomography findings of bowel wall thickening: its significance and relationship to endoscopic abnormalities.

Authors:  M M Uzzaman; A Alam; M S Nair; R Borgstein; L Meleagros
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Three-dimensional light-field microendoscopy with a GRIN lens array.

Authors:  Tara M Urner; Andrew Inman; Benjamin Lapid; Shu Jia
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Rishad Khan; Joanne Plahouras; Bradley C Johnston; Michael A Scaffidi; Samir C Grover; Catharine M Walsh
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-17

8.  The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator.

Authors:  Annaliese M Plooy; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Alanna St G Cresp; Rozemary Karamatic; Stephan Riek; Guy M Wallis; Robin Burgess-Limerick; David G Hewett; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-09-30

9.  Outcomes of use of electromagnetic guidance with responsive insertion technology (RIT) during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shajan Peter; Nipun B Reddy; Mohammed Naseemuddin; Jenine N Zaibaq; Gerald McGwin; C Mel Wilcox
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-01-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.