Candida albicans frequently causes superficial infections by invading and damaging epithelial cells, but may also cause systemic infections by penetrating through epithelial barriers. C. albicans is an unusual pathogen because it can invade epithelial cells via two distinct mechanisms: induced endocytosis, analogous to facultative intracellular enteropathogenic bacteria, and active penetration, similar to plant pathogenic fungi. Here we investigated the molecular basis of C. albicans epithelial interactions. By systematically assessing the contributions of defined fungal pathways and factors to different stages of epithelial interactions, we provide an expansive portrait of the processes and activities involved in epithelial infection. We strengthen the concept that hyphal formation is critical for epithelial invasion. Importantly, our data support a model whereby initial epithelial invasion per se does not elicit host damage, but that C. albicans relies on a combination of contact-sensing, directed hyphal extension, active penetration and the expression of novel pathogenicity factors for further inter-epithelial invasion, dissemination and ultimate damage of host cells. Finally, we explore the transcriptional landscape of C. albicans during the early stages of epithelial interaction, and, via genetic analysis, identify ICL1 and PGA34 as novel oral epithelial pathogenicity factors.
Candida albicans frequently causes superficial infections by invading and damaging epithelial cells, but may also cause systemic infections by penetrating through epithelial barriers. C. albicans is an unusual pathogen because it can invade epithelial cells via two distinct mechanisms: induced endocytosis, analogous to facultative intracellular enteropathogenic bacteria, and active penetration, similar to plant pathogenic fungi. Here we investigated the molecular basis of C. albicans epithelial interactions. By systematically assessing the contributions of defined fungal pathways and factors to different stages of epithelial interactions, we provide an expansive portrait of the processes and activities involved in epithelial infection. We strengthen the concept that hyphal formation is critical for epithelial invasion. Importantly, our data support a model whereby initial epithelial invasion per se does not elicit host damage, but that C. albicans relies on a combination of contact-sensing, directed hyphal extension, active penetration and the expression of novel pathogenicity factors for further inter-epithelial invasion, dissemination and ultimate damage of host cells. Finally, we explore the transcriptional landscape of C. albicans during the early stages of epithelial interaction, and, via genetic analysis, identify ICL1 and PGA34 as novel oral epithelial pathogenicity factors.
The yeastCandida albicans is both a harmless commensal and an
aggressive pathogen. Depending on the anatomical niche in question, up to 70%
or more of the population are colonized with C. albicans without
any sign of disease [1], [2], [3]. The normal bacterial flora of mucosal surfaces, physical
barriers, such as epithelial layers, and a functional immune system maintain the
commensal phase of C. albicans colonization. However, C.
albicans frequently overgrows the microbial flora and causes
superficial infections and epithelial damage [1], [4]. In severe cases, the fungus
can penetrate through epithelial layers into deeper tissues, reach the blood stream
and, from there, may cause life-threatening systemic infections. How the transition
from a harmless commensal to an aggressive pathogen is triggered is still unknown
[5]. Clearly,
adhesion to epithelial cells is a key event in both the commensal and pathogenic
lifestyles of C. albicans
[6], [7], [8]. However, the
molecular mechanisms by which C. albicans attaches to epithelial
surfaces, invades various epithelial barriers, causes damage or disseminates within
the host are only partially understood [9], [10], although, it has recently been
shown that C. albicans can gain entry to host epithelial cells via
two distinct invasion mechanism: induced endocytosis and active penetration [10]. However,
invasion into enterocytes occurs via active penetration only, indicating that
epithelial cells differ in their susceptibility to the fungus [10].One of the best studied virulence attributes and characteristics of C.
albicans is the ability to change morphologies from yeast-to-hyphal
growth (dimorphism) in response to environmental changes. However, the
transcriptional programmes associated with dimorphism are also critical for
virulence and it is often difficult to disentwine the contribution to pathogenicity
of morphology and genes expressed during the different growth forms, since
regulators of morphology also influence the expression of other virulence factors
[11], [12], [13].In addition to dimorphism, a number of fungal attributes, such as the expression of
adhesion factors, directed growth/thigmotropism, stress adaptation, metabolic
flexibility and the secretion of hydrolytic enzymes are implicated in the infection
process. Relevant genes which contribute to these infection-associated processes are
summarized in Table
S1.We hypothesized that different fungal processes and activities (Table S1) may
play different roles during distinct stages of oral candidosis. In this study we
therefore undertook a systematic approach to examine the contributions of these
different fungal activities to oral epithelial infection. We selected a set of 26
mutants lacking factors that we hypothesized to be important for epithelial invasion
(including signaling components, adhesion factors, vacuole biogenesis, intracellular
glycerol accumulation and some genes with previously described roles in infection
– Table
S1) and assessed their ability to adhere to, invade and damage oral
epithelial cells. To strengthen this systematic analysis, we performed genome-wide
transcriptional profiling of C. albicans infecting oral epithelial
monolayers and went on to functionally characterize genes identified as up-regulated
during epithelial infection.Importantly, we identified fungal genes and activities which are necessary for
distinct stages of C. albicans interacting with epithelial cells,
including a subset of genes, such as EED1 and
PGA34, which are dispensable for epithelial invasion but
essential for damage of epithelial cells.
Results
Defined C. albicans pathways, processes and activities: diverse contributions
to epithelial adhesion, invasion and damage
To explore the molecular basis of C. albicans-epithelial
interactions, we adopted a systematic approach to define the molecular
mechanisms underpinning C. albicans-epithelial interactions. A
total of 26 mutants were selected, which either were defective in processes or
activities which we predicted to be important for infection, or which had
previously been described as attenuated during host-pathogen interactions. These
functional groups of factors include regulators of morphology and/or gene
expression (RAS1, EED1, EFG1, CPH1, CPH2, TPK1, TPK2, TEC1, TUP1, BCR1,
HGC1, RIM101 and CZF1), genes encoding cell
surface localized and/or hyphal-associated proteins (ALS3,
HWP1, HYR1 and ECM33), genes encoding
factors involved in glycerol homeostasis, (GPD2,
GPP1, PMT2), morphogenetic plasticity
(VPS11, GPP1), detection of physical contact
(MKC1), alkaline pH response (RIM101),
factors involved in maintenance of cell polarity, directed growth, calcium
influx and homeostasis (CKA2), and/or thigmotropism
(RSR1, BUD2, EED1) and the gene encoding a phospholipase
(PLB1) (Table S1). All analyzed mutant strains were
homozygote deletion mutants except the
pmt2Δ/PMT2 deletion strain, as the
homozygote pmt2Δ/pmt2Δ mutant is not
viable [14].We independently assessed the ability of each mutant to adhere to, invade and
cause damage to oral epithelial cells. Furthermore, all mutants were
additionally tested for enterocyte invasion capacity. Since invasion into
enterocytes is entirely dependent on active penetration and independent of
induced endocytosis [10], this additional series of experiments enabled us to
conclude which invasion mechanism was predominantly attenuated in these mutants.
Similar to our previous study [10], the wild type showed comparable adherence, invasion
and damage properties when interacting with oral epithelial cells or enterocytes
(data not shown). Contact to epithelial or intestinal cells induced
filamentation in almost all yeast cells (>98%) within 60 min and
caused epithelial adhesion (>98%) within 3 h. Although the
morphological phenotypes of most of the mutants used in this study have been
previously published (Table S1) we reasoned that some mutants may
behave differently on epithelial cells. We therefore determined the percentage
of hyphal, pseudohyphal and yeast cells and length of the formed filaments for
each strain following 3 h incubation on epithelial monolayers (Table
S2).To determine adhesion, wild type and mutant cells were adjusted to an inoculum of
1×105 cells, added to and co-incubated with monolayers of
oral epithelial cells. Adhesion was quantified after 1 h of incubation.
Independently, C. albicans cells were incubated on monolayers
for 3 h and invasion of adherent cells quantified using a differential staining
procedure and by calculating the percentage of invaded cells (note that for the
invasion assay, monolayers were only washed at 3 h post-infection). In a third
set of experiments, damage was quantified after 24 h infection by monitoring the
release of epithelial LDH as a measure of cellular lysis (note that for the
damage assay, monolayers were not washed during the 24 h incubation and fungal
cells were not removed from the epithelial monolayer during this time). Only
mutants with statistically significant differences compared to their
corresponding wild type (BWP17+CIp30, CAI4+CIp10, RM1000, or SC5314)
of p<0.05 were considered as different. Since the phenotypes
of all tested parental strains in terms of adhesion, invasion and damage of
epithelial cells were similar to the wild type strain SC5314, only the results
for strain SC5314 were included in the figures.Based on these analyses, we divided the mutants into five different functional
groups: (1) no significant differences, (2) adhesion, invasion and damage
reduced, (3) invasion and damage reduced, (4) damage reduced, (5) adhesion and
damage reduced. None of the tested mutants displayed significantly increased
adherence, invasion or damage potential.
Group 1: genes not involved in adhesion, invasion and damage
Few of the selected mutants showed no significant differences in adhesion,
invasion or damage as compared to wild type cells. These were null mutants
lacking the genes CPH1, CPH2, PLB1 or HYR1,
indicating that these genes do not play any significant roles during interaction
with epithelial cells under the conditions tested (data not shown).
Group 2a: genes associated with adhesion, invasion and damage
Null mutants lacking the genes RIM101, CZF1,
ALS3, HGC1, TUP1,
TEC1, TPK1, TPK2,
RAS1, or VPS11 showed significant
differences at all analyzed stages of infection (adhesion, invasion, damage)
(Fig. 1). Almost all of
these mutants showed dramatically reduced adhesion (less than 35% of the
wild type). Most of these mutants retained a certain degree of invasion
potential (>40% of the wild type), however, the
ras1Δ mutant was almost entirely unable to invade
epithelial cells. Similar to the reduction in adhesion, damage was strongly
reduced for all mutants with tpk1Δ showing no measurable
damage. Therefore, we concluded that group 2a genes are associated with
adhesion, invasion and damage at all stages. All of these mutants also had
significantly reduced abilities to invade enterocytes (data not shown, Table S3),
suggesting that this group had reduced abilities to actively penetrate host
cells. An exceptional member of group 2 was the mutant lacking
TUP1. This mutant is hyperfilamentous, does not grow in the
yeast form, and produces cell clumps, which causes experimental problems since
standard cell counting to adjust to an exact defined cell number for infection
is impossible. Therefore, we filtered tup1Δ cells grown in
liquid precultures to remove larger cell clumps, counted cells under the
microscope and adjusted the inoculum to approximately 2×104
cells. Since exact cell numbers are essential for quantification of adhesion, we
could not quantify adhesion for this mutant. However, since the invasion assay
is based on percent invasion of cells on epithelial surfaces, quantification of
invasion was possible for tup1Δ. Quantification of cell
damage also depends on exact cell numbers, however, since the damage of
tup1Δ was barely measurable (less than 5%
compared to the wild type), which cannot be explained by moderately lower cell
numbers, we concluded that damage of tup1Δ is strongly
reduced.
Figure 1
Groups of mutants lacking genes associated with adhesion, invasion
and damage.
Adhesion, invasion and damage potential was determined for each mutant
and normalized against the relevant wild type. Group 2a mutants showed
reduced adhesion, invasion and damage. The group 2b mutants
efg1Δ and ecm33Δ show
significant reduction in adhesion, but have a further decreased ability
to invade into epithelial cells, suggesting distinct adhesion and
invasion functions of these genes. The group 3 mutant
pmt2Δ/PMT2 lacks factors or
activities which are specifically associated with invasion and damage,
but not adhesion. Group 4 mutants lacking MKC1,
GPP1, GPD2 and EED1 showed
significant reduction in damage, but not adhesion and invasion. Group 5
mutants lacking CKA2, BCR1, HWP1,
BUD2 or RSR1 showed significant
reduction in adhesion and damage, but not invasion. n. d.
= not determined; */**, significant
difference compared to the corresponding wild type (WT)
(p<0.05/p<0.01). Note that
adhesion, invasion and damage assays were performed separately.
Groups of mutants lacking genes associated with adhesion, invasion
and damage.
Adhesion, invasion and damage potential was determined for each mutant
and normalized against the relevant wild type. Group 2a mutants showed
reduced adhesion, invasion and damage. The group 2b mutants
efg1Δ and ecm33Δ show
significant reduction in adhesion, but have a further decreased ability
to invade into epithelial cells, suggesting distinct adhesion and
invasion functions of these genes. The group 3 mutant
pmt2Δ/PMT2 lacks factors or
activities which are specifically associated with invasion and damage,
but not adhesion. Group 4 mutants lacking MKC1,
GPP1, GPD2 and EED1 showed
significant reduction in damage, but not adhesion and invasion. Group 5
mutants lacking CKA2, BCR1, HWP1,
BUD2 or RSR1 showed significant
reduction in adhesion and damage, but not invasion. n. d.
= not determined; */**, significant
difference compared to the corresponding wild type (WT)
(p<0.05/p<0.01). Note that
adhesion, invasion and damage assays were performed separately.
Group 2b: genes associated with adhesion, invasion and damage;
adhesion-independent functions in invasion
Group 2b comprised efg1Δ and ecm33Δ and
showed reduced adhesion, reduced invasion and reduced damage. Therefore, these
genes belong to group 2. However, in contrast to group 2a, the invasion
attenuation of group 2b mutants was much stronger than the observed reduction in
adhesion (Fig. 1). Adhesion
of efg1Δ was 45% reduced, but invasion of
efg1Δ into epithelial cells was more than 70%
reduced. Similarly, adhesion of ecm33Δ was 45%
reduced, but invasion of ecm33Δ into epithelial cells was
more than 60% reduced, suggesting that EFG1 and
ECM33 play additional adhesion-independent roles in
invasion. Furthermore, invasion of efg1Δ into enterocytes
was dramatically reduced (less than 5% of wild type,) while invasion of
ecm33Δ into enterocytes was reduced by 50% (data
not shown), indicating that both mutants had reduced abilities to actively
penetrate host cells.Interestingly, all tested mutants with defects in the cAMP-PKA-Efg1 signaling
pathway (ras1Δ, tpk1Δ,
tpk2Δ, efg1Δ,
tec1Δ) belonged to group 2, or the related sub-group 2b
and had defects in adhesion, invasion and damage.
Group 3: PMT2 plays a specific role in epithelial invasion
and damage
Interestingly, of all strains tested, only one mutant
(pmt2Δ/PMT2) exhibited unaltered
adhesion properties but significantly reduced invasion (>30% reduced)
and damage capacity (>80% reduced) (Fig. 1). Similarly, invasion into enterocytes
was strongly reduced (less than 30% of wild type, data not shown),
suggesting that pmt2Δ/PMT2 is defective
for active penetration of host cells.
Group 4: genes which are specifically associated with damage
In this group, neither adhesion nor invasion of mutants was significantly
altered, but damage of oral epithelial cells was significantly reduced (Fig. 1). The mutants in this
group include strains lacking the genes MKC1, GPD2,
GPP1 or EED1. In particular, damage of
oral epithelial cells by eed1Δ was dramatically reduced. An
EED1 re-integrant strain restored wild type damage (data
not shown). Interestingly, all damage associated strains of this group were able
to form hyphae comparable to the wild type strain SC5314 by 3 h post-infection.
Therefore, these mutants lack genes, which are specifically involved in damage
of oral cells, but not adhesion or invasion. Since both GPD2
and GPP1 are involved in glycerol metabolism, we hypothesized
that reduced intracellular glycerol content and resulting turgor pressure may
have influenced the damage potential of mutant cells. We therefore measured the
glycerol content of gpp1Δ and gpd2Δ
mutants under osmotic stress conditions. Only the gpp1Δ
mutant contained significantly less glycerol –36.1±2.5%
(p<0.0017) as compared to the level of wild type cells
– under this condition.
Group 5: genes which are specifically associated with adhesion and damage,
but not invasion
Null mutants lacking the genes CKA2, BCR1,
HWP1, BUD2 or RSR1 were
strongly reduced in adhesion (at 1 h), but not significantly reduced in invasion
into oral epithelial cells (at 3 h) (Fig. 1). Despite normal invasion potential,
damage of oral monolayers was, like group 4 mutants, significantly reduced.
Therefore, these genes seem to play a role in initial adhesion and subsequent
damage, but are dispensable for invasion at 3 h. Together with the data for
group 4, it would appear that considerable (i.e. wild type) levels of epithelial
invasion can occur without eliciting significant damage of the host cells,
suggesting that although oral epithelial invasion is required for damage,
invasion per se does not cause damage and that other fungal
activities are involved in epithelial destruction.
Group 4 and 5: stage specific roles in epithelial infection
Group 4 and 5 mutants displayed specific defects during epithelial infection. Of
particular interest was the fact that these mutants invaded at the same rate as
the wild type, but caused significantly reduced epithelial damage. We therefore
decided to further dissect the roles of these “damage-associated”
group 4 and 5 genes during epithelial infection.
Differential adhesion kinetics (group 5)
The reduced initial adhesion (1 h) but unattenuated invasion (3 h) of group 5
mutants suggested that the respective gene products had major influences on
initial adhesion, but that their requirements are then bypassed following
extended epithelial contact. We therefore analyzed the adhesion kinetics of wild
type C. albicans, as well as mutants lacking the regulatory
GTPase Rsr1 (encoded by RSR1), involved in maintenance of cell
polarity, directed growth and thigmotropism, its cognate GTPase activating
protein (encoded by BUD2) and the adhesin-encoding
HWP1. As shown in Fig. 2, adhesion rates at 20 min were low for
all tested strains; however, following 1 h incubation, wild type cells began to
adhere in greater numbers whilst adhesion rates of bud2Δ,
rsr1Δ and hwp1Δ remained low. At 2
h, wild type adhesion had continued to rise and bud2Δ and
rsr1Δ strains adhered in greater numbers; however
adhesion of hwp1Δ at this time point remained low. Only by
3 h had all strains reached approximately maximum adhesion similar to the wild
type (Fig. 2). Therefore,
the reduced damage caused by these mutants cannot be explained by fewer
initially invading cells. Together these data suggest that primary adhesion of
C. albicans to epithelium relies on a combination of
factors, including GTPase signaling and the expression of appropriate adhesins,
but that following prolonged contact (3 h), defects elicited by the deletion of
a single gene are compensated for.
Figure 2
Adhesion kinetics of C. albicans wild type (WT),
bud2Δ, rsr1Δ and
hwp1Δ mutant cells.
Oral TR146 epithelial cells were co-incubated with 105
C. albicans cells for either 20, 60, 120, or 180 min.
After extensive washing and fixation, the samples were stained and the
adherent cells were counted under the fluorescence microscope. The
experiment was performed at least three times in duplicates. The values
are calculated as percentage of adherent cells compared to wild type
adherent cells at 180 min (100%). */**, significant
difference compared to the adhesion of the corresponding WT to oral
epithelial cells
(p<0.05/p<0.01).
Adhesion kinetics of C. albicans wild type (WT),
bud2Δ, rsr1Δ and
hwp1Δ mutant cells.
Oral TR146 epithelial cells were co-incubated with 105
C. albicans cells for either 20, 60, 120, or 180 min.
After extensive washing and fixation, the samples were stained and the
adherent cells were counted under the fluorescence microscope. The
experiment was performed at least three times in duplicates. The values
are calculated as percentage of adherent cells compared to wild type
adherent cells at 180 min (100%). */**, significant
difference compared to the adhesion of the corresponding WT to oral
epithelial cells
(p<0.05/p<0.01).
Specific invasion roles (group 4 and 5)
Although fully proficient for invasion into TR-146 oral epithelial cells, when
tested for invasion into enterocytes, some mutants displayed substantial
invasion defects. Indeed, of the nine damage-associated mutants (group 4/5),
only two (eed1Δ and mkc1Δ) exhibited
wild type levels of invasion into enterocytes (Fig. 3), suggesting that
EED1 and MKC1 are not required for
invasion into either cell type. On the other hand, gpd2Δ,
gpp1Δ, cka2Δ,
bcr1Δ, hwp1Δ,
bud2Δ and rsr1Δ, all of which were
fully proficient for oral epithelial invasion (Fig. 1), exhibited strong and significantly
reduced invasion into enterocytes (Fig. 3). Together these data show that certain C.
albicans genes are specifically required for invasion into
enterocytes but not oral epithelial cells.
Figure 3
Enterocyte invasion by group 4 and 5 damage-associated
mutants.
C. albicans cells (wild type and
rsr1Δ, bud2Δ,
hwp1Δ, bcr1Δ,
cka2Δ, eed1Δ,
gpp1Δ, gpd2Δ and
mkc1Δ) were co-incubated with Caco-2
enterocytes for 3 h. After fixation the samples were differentially
stained and analyzed under the fluorescence microscope. The experiment
was performed at least three times in duplicates. */**,
significant difference compared to the corresponding WT invasion
(control) (p<0.05/p<0.01).
Enterocyte invasion by group 4 and 5 damage-associated
mutants.
C. albicans cells (wild type and
rsr1Δ, bud2Δ,
hwp1Δ, bcr1Δ,
cka2Δ, eed1Δ,
gpp1Δ, gpd2Δ and
mkc1Δ) were co-incubated with Caco-2
enterocytes for 3 h. After fixation the samples were differentially
stained and analyzed under the fluorescence microscope. The experiment
was performed at least three times in duplicates. */**,
significant difference compared to the corresponding WT invasion
(control) (p<0.05/p<0.01).
Damage of oral epithelial multilayers (group 4 and 5)
Because many of the damage-associated genes (group 4/5) are involved in
thigmotropism and/or hyphal orientation (Table S1), we next questioned whether they
are required for interactions with oral epithelial multilayers, where
inter-epithelial dissemination of the wild type predominantly occurs vertically
[15],
rather than laterally, as is the case for epithelial monolayers.Wild type and damage-associated mutants (group 4/5) were therefore used to infect
reconstituted human oral epithelium (RHOE) and damage assayed following 24 h of
infection by measuring LDH release. eed1Δ and
hwp1Δ exhibited significantly reduced damage of RHOE
(Table 1). As shown by
Zakikhany et al., (2007) an EED1 re-integrant
strain completely restored wild type morphology and epithelial damage in the
RHOE model [15]. bcr1Δ also exhibited a notable
reduction in RHOE damage, however this was not statistically significant.
Interestingly, bud2Δ, cka2Δ,
gpd2Δ, gpp1Δ and
mkc1Δ were not attenuated for damage. The
rsr1Δ mutant displayed some (37%,
non-significant) reduction in RHOE damage; however this was a very moderate
attenuation in damage of RHOE in comparison to the strong damage attenuation of
rsr1Δ associated with epithelial monolayers
(97%, Fig. 1). We
therefore conclude that RSR1 plays a substantial role in
epithelial monolayer, but not multilayer damage.
Table 1
Damage of RHOE tissue caused by wild type and mutant strains after 24
h.
tested mutant strain
LDH release (% WT)
WT (SC5314)
100%
bcr1Δ
56.2±8.8
bud2Δ
74.7±10.2
cka2Δ
77.3±6.1
ipf946Δ
(eed1Δ)
42.4±22.9*
gpd2Δ
79.5±32.1
gpp1Δ
74.5±21.5
hwp1Δ
90.6±0.9*
mkc1Δ
88.6±0.5
pmt2Δ/PMT2
57.2±36.1
rsr1Δ
63.0±18.9
Extracellular LDH release was measured as a marker for tissue damage
and values are listed as percentage of wild type damage.
*p<0.05 compared to the wild type.
Extracellular LDH release was measured as a marker for tissue damage
and values are listed as percentage of wild type damage.*p<0.05 compared to the wild type.Together these data demonstrate that BUD2,
RSR1, CKA2, MKC1,
GPD2 and GPP1 are specifically required
for damage of oral epithelial monolayers, but dispensable for damage of
multilayers of the same cell type.In summary, we have demonstrated that certain C. albicans genes,
such as EFG1 and components of its upstream regulatory pathway
are essential for all stages of C. albicans-epithelial
interaction, whilst other genes can have discreet functions at different stages
of infection. For example, EED1 is dispensable for invasion
into both oral epithelial cells and enterocytes, but required for epithelial
damage. On the other hand, genes involved in glycerol homeostasis
(GPD2 and GPP1) and directed hyphal growth
(BUD2 and RSR1), are specifically required
for enterocyte, but not oral epithelial, invasion, and are essential for full
epithelial damage.
Transcriptional profiling during adhesion, invasion and damage of
monolayers
Following on from our systematic analysis of known fungal factors, we next
analyzed C. albicans gene expression during oral infection. Our
transcriptional analysis had three major aims. (1) To verify our functional
analysis (above): for example, we predicted that certain genes required for
epithelial interactions (or, in the case of transcriptional regulators, their
target genes) would be up-regulated during infection. (2) To provide further
data of the cellular activities of C. albicans in response to
contact with host cells and host cell activities. (3) To identify novel
infection-associated genes and processes.To analyze the expression profile of C. albicans during the
early stages of epithelial interaction and invasion, we co-incubated C.
albicans cells (from exponential phase yeast preculture conditions)
with monolayers of oral epithelial cells and isolated RNA from samples at 20, 60
and 180 min for genome-wide transcriptional profiling. We reasoned that analysis
of transcriptional changes at these early time points may reflect the fungal
activities directly involved in adhesion and invasion, but may also identify
genes that are subsequently involved in epithelial damage. Next, the sample RNA
was co-hybridized against RNA from the exponential preculture condition (common
reference, see
) to determine temporal fluctuations in gene
expression. In parallel, we incubated C. albicans cells under
the same conditions on the plastic surfaces of cell culture wells but without
epithelial cells to identify gene expression responses specific to epithelial
cells. Both data sets, differentially regulated genes compared to YPD and to
plastic, can be accessed in Table S4 and S5,
respectively.To verify our microarray data, we tested the expression of selected genes
(CRP1, OPT9, orf19.6835,
PGA37, GPP1, orf19.3600,
ECE1 and ALS3) by quantitative RT-PCR.
Overall, the change in expression of all genes tested by qRT-PCR was in
agreement with the direction of fold change as determined by microarray analysis
(data not shown).
Overview of gene expression in response to oral cells
A large number of genes (607) was regulated during the infection process as
compared to the common reference (Table S4). Some of these (147) were also
regulated on plastic, and therefore may be involved in adaptation to the common
environmental conditions of the experiment (temperature, CO2 medium
etc.) or may be associated with particular transcriptional programs, for example
the yeast-to-hypha transition [5], [12]. However, we also monitored a specific
transcriptional response to epithelial cells. The transcript levels of 547
C. albicans genes changed more than two-fold in cells
co-incubated with epithelial cells at one or more time points compared to
plastic (Table
S5). Interestingly, most of these epithelial-specific responses were
monitored at the early adaptation phase: the mRNA levels of 266 genes were
significantly altered in response to epithelial cells at time point 20 min
(compared to plastic), indicating that C. albicans rapidly
senses and responds to epithelial cells (Table S5). The number of oral cell/plastic
differentially regulated genes decreased during the experiment to 206 genes at
60 min and 186 at 180 min. Compared to plastic, a total of 24 genes were up- or
down-regulated at all three time points, 20 genes at both 20 min and 60 min or
180 min, and 23 genes at both 60 min and 180 min (Fig. 4A). This indicates that a number of
genes were specifically expressed due to contact with epithelial cells and that
the profiles changed dynamically during the infection process.
Figure 4
Distribution of differentially regulated genes and hierarchical
clustering.
(A) Venn diagram showing the distribution of the differentially regulated
genes from C. albicans cells grown on epithelial
monolayer at 20, 60 and 180 min after horizontal analysis as compared to
plastic. (B) Hierarchical clustering of C. albicans
genes expressed at 20, 60 and 180 min incubation on oral epithelial
cells versus plastic. Gene expression is shown in a logarithmic color
range from −11.31 in blue to 11.31 in red. Non regulated genes (1)
are shown in yellow. The profiles of the earliest time points cluster
more distant to the later time points. The expression profiles of
C. albicans exposed to epithelial cells at 20, 60
and 180 min did not show any clear similarities. In contrast, the
profiles of cells exposed to plastic for 60 and 180 min were most
similar to each other as compared to all other samples.
Distribution of differentially regulated genes and hierarchical
clustering.
(A) Venn diagram showing the distribution of the differentially regulated
genes from C. albicans cells grown on epithelial
monolayer at 20, 60 and 180 min after horizontal analysis as compared to
plastic. (B) Hierarchical clustering of C. albicans
genes expressed at 20, 60 and 180 min incubation on oral epithelial
cells versus plastic. Gene expression is shown in a logarithmic color
range from −11.31 in blue to 11.31 in red. Non regulated genes (1)
are shown in yellow. The profiles of the earliest time points cluster
more distant to the later time points. The expression profiles of
C. albicans exposed to epithelial cells at 20, 60
and 180 min did not show any clear similarities. In contrast, the
profiles of cells exposed to plastic for 60 and 180 min were most
similar to each other as compared to all other samples.Hierarchical clustering of all transcriptional profiles of C. albicans cells from
all three time points either in contact to plastic or epithelial cells showed
that profiles from C. albicans in contact to plastic at time points 60 and 180
min were most similar to each other, but different from the cells in contact to
plastic at 20 min (Fig. 4B).
In contrast, the expression profiles of C. albicans in contact to epithelial
cells were not similar to each other at all three time points possibly
indicating dynamic changes during the fungal-epithelial interactions.
Furthermore, these profiles clustered distinct from the plastic control at all
three time points, indicating a specific response of C. albicans to epithelial
cells. In fact, we identified large sets of genes specifically responsive to
epithelial cells. Some of these are discussed below.
Expression of genes involved in protein synthesis, nutrient uptake and
metabolism
The need for C. albicans to rapidly adapt to changing
environmental conditions during the initiation of infection was reflected by the
up-regulation of numerous genes involved in protein synthesis, including genes
coding for ribosomal proteins (RPS10, RPS14B, RPP2A, RPP2B, RPL38,
39, and 82, MRPL8), RNA helicases
(HAS1) and transcriptional activators
(CTA26) (Table S5). Interestingly, genes encoding key
enzymes of the glyoxylate cycle and of gluconeogenesis (ICL1,
MLS1, PCK1, FBP1) were
strongly induced upon contact with epithelial cells in comparison to the YPD
pre-culture (Table S4), but were not differentially expressed between oral cells
and plastic. This suggests that, although C. albicans
up-regulates alternative carbon assimilation pathways upon infection, this
activity is not specifically induced by the presence of epithelial cells. We
observed no indication of nitrogen starvation since genes coding for proteins
involved in nitrogen transport such as amino acid permeases
(GAP1) or oligopeptide transporter (OPT8)
were down-regulated in C. albicans cells in contact with
epithelial cells compared to plastic. Similarly, iron did not appear limiting as
several genes known to be induced under high iron conditions such as
BIO2 and PGA62
[16] were
up-regulated compared to plastic. Concurrently, genes induced by low
environmental iron, such as the transcription factor gene MAC1,
the ferric reductase genes FRE10 and CFL2, the
high-affinity iron permease gene FTR1, the siderophore
transporter genes SIT1
[16] and
CYB2, a gene transcriptional regulated by iron [16], were
down-regulated in C. albicans cells in contact with epithelial
cells compared to plastic. In contrast, the accessibility of other trace
elements such as phosphate, copper and zinc seem to be limited during oral
epithelial infection indicated by the up-regulation of a phosphate transporter
(PHO87), the copper transporter gene CRP1
and the zinc transporter gene ZRT2.
Expression of stress response genes
Expression patterns indicated a stress response due to contact with epithelial
cells or exposure to epithelial cellular content. For example, the genes
JIP5, PWP2 and MPP10,
known to be down-regulated as part of the core stress response [17], [18], were
down-regulated at 60 min. Similarly, CDR4, known to be
up-regulated as part of the core stress response, was up-regulated at 60 min
during contact with epithelial cells as compared to plastic. Together, this
indicates that, at 60 min, C. albicans rapidly encounters an
acute environmental insult; although, because of the non-specific responsive
nature of these genes, their regulation does not indicate what stress that might
be. It may be that C. albicans faces reactive oxygen species as
SOD5, which play a protective role against oxidative
stress, is up-regulated during contact with oral cells compared to plastic and
strongly induced (up to 40 fold) compared to YPD. YHB1, which
is involved in the detoxification of reactive nitrogen species was also induced,
supporting the view that C. albicans faces nitrosative stress
during interactions with epithelial cells [15]. However,
YHB1 is also transcriptionally up-regulated by oxidative
stress [17], so a clear nitrosative stress response cannot be drawn
from this data. Finally, HSP70, known to play a role in
response to beta-defensins, was up-regulated in response to epithelial cells
after 180 min of co-incubation with epithelial cells.
Expression of genes associated with epithelial adhesion, invasion and
damage
Many of the mutants which we had tested for epithelial infection (Fig. 1, Table S1)
lacked genes encoding regulatory factors. Although such genes can play important
roles under certain environmental conditions, differential expression levels may
not be detected by microarray analysis due to transient expression and tight
negative feedback. Indeed, despite the critical role of the cAMP-PKA-Efg1
pathway in mediating epithelial interactions, only the gene encoding Tec1 was
significantly up-regulated during contact with oral epithelial cells as compared
to YPD (Table
S4). However, a number of target genes of Efg1 have been previously
identified during hyphal growth and a set of 38 genes relies on the presence of
EFG1
[19]. We
therefore analyzed the expression profile of these 38 genes during oral
epithelial infection. Remarkably, 39% of these Efg1-target genes were
up-regulated during infection. IHD2, orf19.1862, orf19.1654,
POL93 and SAP6 were up-regulated compared
to YPD; ADH5, orf19.1691 and orf19.3461 were up-regulated
compared to plastic; ECE1, HWP1,
IHD1, IRO1, orf19.3384,
PLB5 and SOD5 were up-regulated compared
to both YPD and plastic.Similarly, RIM101, which encodes a pH-responsive transcriptional
regulator, was required for all stages of epithelial interactions (Fig. 1) but not
transcriptionally regulated during infection. However, numerous Rim101 target
genes, such as ZRT1 (encoding a zinc transporter),
PGA10/RBT51 (involved in haemoglobin
utilization), PHR1 and PRA1 (encoding surface
antigens) were more highly expressed by C. albicans cells in
contact with epithelial cells than plastic.We had also demonstrated the importance of the hyphal-associated cell surface
adhesins (ALS3 and HWP1) for oral infection.
Reassuringly, both of these genes, along with numerous other hyphal-associated
genes were more highly expressed during contact with epithelial cells than YPD
(Table
S4). Interestingly, many hyphal-associated genes, including
ALS3, HWP1, ECE1,
SOD5, PHR1, PRA1, and
RBT1 were defined as transcriptionally up-regulated in
C. albicans cells in contact with epithelial cells compared
to contact to plastic (Table S5), despite the fact that under both
of these conditions C. albicans grew as hyphae. These data
indicate that hyphal-associated genes can be expressed at different levels by
hyphae growing on different surfaces. Moreover, ECM33, which
also encodes a cell surface adhesin, but which has not been previously described
as hypha-associated, was up-regulated during contact with epithelial cells
compared to plastic, but not compared to YPD.Factors involved in glycerol homeostasis (GPD2,
GPP1, PMT2), morphogenetic plasticity
(VPS11, GPP1, EED1), detection of physical
contact (MKC1), or factors which are important for maintenance
of cell polarity, directed growth and thigmotropism (RSR1,
BUD2) were also important for epithelial infection (Fig. 1). However, most of
these genes did not exhibit significant regulation. Due to the important role of
these genes in damage of epithelium (which was measured at 24 h), it is possible
that they are not up-regulated until later time-points, outside the 3 h of our
transcriptional analysis.
Functional characterization of epithelial-induced genes
Our transcriptional profiling of C. albicans oral epithelial
infection had confirmed the expression of some of the genes which we had shown
to be involved in host-pathogen interactions (above); however, we also observed
up-regulation of genes involved in alternative carbon assimilation, stress
response and a large number of genes of unknown function (above). We therefore
selected eight representative genes for further functional analysis during oral
epithelial infection. These were: ICL1 (encoding an isocitrate
lyase of the glyoxylate cycle, required for alternative carbon metabolism),
YHB1 (encoding a nitric oxide dioxygenase required for
nitric oxide detoxification), SOD5 (encoding a superoxide
dismutase, required for oxidative stress tolerance), PGA34,
orf19.851, orf19.3459, orf19.3600 and orf19.6837 (all of which encode proteins
of unknown function). sod5Δ, icl1Δ and
yhb1Δ mutants had already been constructed [20], [21], [22], [23]. For the
other five genes we constructed homozygous mutants as described in
.
Deletion of SOD5, YHB1, orf19.851, orf19.3459,
orf19.3600 and orf19.6837 did not alter epithelial damage (data not shown).
However, pga34Δ and icl1Δ mutants
exhibited reduced epithelial damage (Fig. 5). pga34Δ adhered
to and invaded epithelial cells at wild type levels, whilst
icl1Δ also exhibited reduced invasion.
Figure 5
Adhesion, invasion and damage properties of selected mutants lacking
epithelial infection up-regulated genes.
C. albicans mutant strains lacking ICL1
and PGA34 showed wild type levels of adhesion and/or
invasion. However, icl1Δ showed significantly
reduced invasion and damage and pga34Δ showed
significantly reduced damage. The values are calculated as percentage of
adherent/invasive cells or damage compared to the corresponding wild
type (100%). **, significant difference compared to the
corresponding wild type (WT) (p<0.01).
Adhesion, invasion and damage properties of selected mutants lacking
epithelial infection up-regulated genes.
C. albicans mutant strains lacking ICL1
and PGA34 showed wild type levels of adhesion and/or
invasion. However, icl1Δ showed significantly
reduced invasion and damage and pga34Δ showed
significantly reduced damage. The values are calculated as percentage of
adherent/invasive cells or damage compared to the corresponding wild
type (100%). **, significant difference compared to the
corresponding wild type (WT) (p<0.01).These data suggest that a functional glyoxylate cycle is essential for epithelial
invasion and damage. Moreover, it would appear that genes of unknown function
can play important roles during oral infection.
Discussion
Cellular dissection of the early stages of C.
albicans-epithelial interaction
Microbial invasion of non-professional phagocytic host cells can occur via two
general mechanisms: active penetration or induced endocytosis. Plant pathogenic
fungi can actively penetrate plant cell walls by producing specialized
structures (called appressoria), hydrolases and high turgor pressures [24], [25]. Parasites,
such as members of the apicomplexa group, can actively penetrate into host cells
using actin-mediated forces [26]. Bacteria, on the
other hand, cannot actively penetrate host cells, but have developed several
strategies to cause up-take by induced endocytosis [26], [27].
Therefore, different pathogenic microbes have developed different mechanisms for
invading host cells.C. albicans is capable of invading epithelial cells via both
induced endocytosis and active penetration [10], [15], [28].
Molecular dissection of oral epithelial infection
The only defined molecular mechanism of epithelial invasion by C.
albicans is Als3-E-cadherin mediated induced endocytosis. We
therefore systematically assessed the role of 26 genes (Table S1)
in adherence to, invasion and damage of oral epithelial cells. These genes were
carefully selected based on their described or predicted function, which we
hypothesized to be important for the different stages of epithelial infection.
Although some of these mutants had previously been tested for certain stages of
epithelial interaction, we here provide an infection-orientated systematic
functional analysis, supported by global transcriptional profiling of C.
albicans infection of epithelial cells. Moreover, we selected
additional genes which we identified as transcriptionally up-regulated in
C. albicans cells in contact with epithelial cells and
assessed the effect of deletion of these genes on epithelial invasion and
damage. Table
S3 summarizes the epithelial adhesion, invasion and damage phenotypes
of all mutants as described previously and as demonstrated in the current study.
In the following section we describe some of the trends that we observed based
on our functional analysis and transcriptional profiling.
Correlation with previous studies
Of the total of 34 mutants tested here, 13 had previously been characterized for
epithelial interactions and overall our findings are in agreement with previous
studies (Table
S3). With the exception of tpk1Δ, the only
observed discrepancies were at the invasion stage: we observed normal invasion
by bud2Δ, rsr1Δ and
cka2Δ. Brand et al. (2008) reported
reduced invasion potential of bud2Δ and
rsr1Δ into TERT-2 epithelial cells following 8 h
incubation [29]. Chiang et al. (2007) reported reduced
invasion of cka2Δ into FaDu oral epithelial cells following
90 min incubation [30]. Conversely, we observed reduced epithelial adhesion,
invasion and damage for both tpk1Δ and
tpk2Δ strains, whereas Park et al.
(2005) reported no difference between wild type and tpk1Δ
for adhesion to (90 min), invasion (90 min) or damage (3 h) of FaDu epithelial
cells and reduced adhesion and damage for tpk2Δ [31]. We conclude
that these observed invasion differences are due to the different oral
epithelial cell line (TR-146) and incubation time (3 h) used in the present
study.A transcriptional profiling study of C. albicans strains
CAI4-URA3 and a clinical isolate (7392) infecting FaDu oral epithelial cells has
recently been described by Park et al. (2005) [32]. In this
study, the authors identified 51 genes as transcriptionally up-regulated during
contact with oral epithelial cells compared to plastic. Despite the fact that
different C. albicans strains, cell culture medium, epithelial
cell lines and time points were analyzed by Park et al. (2005)
[32], we
also observed the induction of four genes in C. albicans cells
in contact with epithelial cells that were in common with the previous study.
These genes, shown to be expressed in both studies were: MET1,
SEC14, orf19.631 and orf19.6931. Interestingly,
SEC14, which encodes an essential phospholipid transfer
protein, involved in membrane trafficking and the production of secretory
vesicles from the Golgi apparatus [33] was also reported as
transcriptionally up-regulated during infection of oral RHOE tissue [15] (Table S5),
suggesting a core role for secretory vesicle transport during oral infection.
Indeed many of the genes which we observed as up-regulated during epithelial
monolayer infection, including ALS3, HWP1,
ICL1, PHR1, SOD5, and
YHB1 were also shown to up-regulated in samples from
patients suffering from oral candidosis [15], suggesting that our
epithelial monolayer model does reflect certain aspects of oral infection.Interestingly, four of these genes were also shown to be required for
interactions with epithelial cells: als3Δ,
hwp1Δ, icl1Δ (this study) and
phr1Δ [34] were attenuated during invasion and/or damage of
human epithelia, further indicating that in vitro analysis can
mirror the situation in vivo.
The core elements of the cAMP-PKA-Efg1 pathway are required for all stages of
oral infection
The expression of cell surface adhesion factors, as well as the yeast-to-hyphal
transition itself, are governed by a network of signal transduction pathways.
Interestingly, mutants lacking each of the components of the cAMP-PKA pathway
which we investigated (Ras1, Tpk1, Tpk2, Efg1), as well as Rim101 and Hgc1 [34], which also
signal through Efg1, together with the Efg1 targets, TEC1 and
CZF1, displayed reduced adhesion, invasion and damage of
oral epithelial cells (group 2). The components of this pathway are required for
both hyphal morphogenesis [35] and the correct expression of cell surface adhesion
factors including Als3 and Hwp1. The attenuated adhesion, invasion and damage of
these mutants is therefore likely due to combined defects in morphogenesis and
the expression of other factors.Moreover, of the 38 genes which have been reported to rely on the presence of
Efg1 for expression during hyphal growth [19], 39% were
transcriptionally up-regulated in our model. Combined with the phenotypes of the
efg1Δ mutant and mutants of up-stream regulators of
Efg1, these data suggest that the output of the cAMP-PKA pathway is important
for all stages of interactions with oral epithelial cells. Therefore, this
underscores the importance of hyphal morphogenesis, together with the associated
transcriptional programs for this type of infection.Although Ras1 is also an upstream element of the Cek1 MAPK pathway, which
regulates morphology and hyphal associated genes under certain conditions,
signaling through this pathway does not appear to be as important for invasive
growth under the conditions tested here. This is evident since a
cph1Δ mutant, which lacks the terminal transcription
factor of the Cek1 MAPK pathway, retained wild type levels of adhesion, invasion
and damage. This provides further evidence that defects observed upon
RAS1 deletion were mainly due to disruption of the cAMP-PKA
pathway.Surprisingly, a mutant lacking Cph2 was not significantly attenuated in adhesion,
invasion or damage. Cph2 is known to regulate Tec1 [36], which in turn controls Bcr1
and thus Als3 and Hwp1 expression [37]. However, since hyphal
formation of the cph2Δ mutant was also not altered in our
model (Table
S4), we concluded that cph2Δ hyphae likely
express Als3, Hwp1 or other adhesion factors similar to the wild type under the
conditions investigated.
Fungal cell surface adhesins mediate initial attachment, but play
differential roles in invasion
In this study we analyzed the behavior of mutants lacking two major adhesion
factors (Als3 and Hwp1), as well as their direct upstream activator (Bcr1)
during interactions with epithelial cells. Our microarray analysis demonstrated
that both ALS3 and HWP1 were transcriptionally
up-regulated during contact with oral epithelial cells and that mutants lacking
either HWP1 or ALS3 have reduced potential to
adhere to oral cells as compared to wild type, confirming previous data from
other studies that Als3 and Hwp1 are major adhesins of C.
albicans
[8], [38]. Deletion of
BCR1 resulted in an even stronger adhesion defect, in line
with the role of Bcr1 as a direct transcriptional activator of adhesin-encoding
genes (including both ALS3 and HWP1 –
[37]).
Interestingly, while deletion of the multi-functional (adhesin, invasin and
ferritin receptor) ALS3 gene inhibited adhesion and invasion as
well as subsequent damage (group 2), bcr1Δ and
hwp1Δ mutants exhibited reduced adhesion but invaded at
rates similar to the wild type (group 5). These data fit with the idea of Als3
as both an adhesin and invasin. Furthermore, it would appear that, at the
invasion phase, either Bcr1-dependent expression of ALS3 is
bypassed or that compensatory induction of other invasion factors occurs.
Indeed, it has been shown that als3Δ cells can form
biofilms in vivo, but not in vitro
[39],
demonstrating that additional host-associated stimuli can bypass dependency on
Als3 for biofilm formation. Although capable of invading epithelial cells,
bcr1Δ and hwp1Δ caused reduced
damage compared to the wild type. This may be linked to delayed adhesion,
resulting in perturbed epithelial interactions at later stages. However, it is
also possible that these two factors play additional roles in epithelial
destruction at later time points. For example, Bcr1 may be required for the
expression of other cell surface components which contribute to epithelial
damage.
The physical contact sensing/response machinery and morphogenic plasticity
play specific roles during interactions with epithelial cells
PMT2 and ICL1 were the only genes specifically
required for invasion and damage. Deletion of a single copy of
PMT2, which encodes a protein mannosyltransferase, results
in numerous physiological defects including reduced growth, protein
mannosylation (possibly including that of cell surface adhesins), cell wall
β-1,6-glucan and mannoprotein levels, glycerol content and a significant
down-regulation of GPP1 and GPD2, and
defective expression of secreted proteases [14], [40], [41]. Therefore, a combination
of these defects may account for the observed reduction in epithelial invasion
and damage. Icl1, on the other hand, specifically mediates the conversion of
isocitrate to succinate and glyoxylate. It is unclear whether C.
albicans genuinely relies on alternative carbon sources for growth
during our in vitro model of oral infection, as is the case
during systemic infection [23], or if the glyoxylate cycle is required for the
biosynthesis of metabolic intermediates involved in invasion, analogous to
glycerol-mediated turgor pressure of plant pathogens [25].Group 4 and 5 damage-associated mutants exhibited specific defects in epithelial
interactions: mutants lacking MKC1, GPD2,
GPP1, EED1, CKA2,
BUD2, RSR1, and PGA34
invaded epithelial cells at similar rates to the wild type but were defective in
oral epithelial damage. Moreover, gpd2Δ,
gpp1Δ, cka2Δ,
bcr1Δ, hwp1Δ,
bud2Δ and rsr1Δ all exhibited
significantly reduced invasion into Caco-2 enterocytes, but not into TR146 oral
epithelial cells. Furthermore, bud2Δ,
cka2Δ, gpd2Δ,
gpp1Δ and mkc1Δ were attenuated for
damage of oral epithelial monolayers but not multilayers.CKA2 encodes a conserved catalytic subunit of the CK2 protein
kinase which has been implicated in the calcineurin pathway in C.
albicans
[42]. Because
of its central role in governing calcium homeostasis, the calcineurin pathway
likely plays an important role in governing hyphal orientation [43]. Similarly,
MKC1 encodes a mitogen-activated protein kinase of the cell
wall integrity pathway and is involved in contact sensing-mediated invasive
growth [44].
The Ras-GTPase, Rsr1 and its cognate GTPase activating protein, Bud2 have both
been shown to be directly involved in hyphal orientation and thigmotropism [29].
GPP1 and GPD2 both encode enzymes of
glycerol biosynthesis and glycerol accumulation is essential for generating
turgor pressure in fungi [25]. Although we were only able to directly measure
reduced glycerol content of the gpp1Δ mutant under osmotic
stress conditions, it is likely that Gpd2 also contributes to glycerol
biosynthesis, possibly only under specific conditions; alternatively, Gpd2 may
promote glycerol accumulation specifically at the hyphal tip.EED1 is dispensable for initial germ tube formation but
essential for the maintenance of hyphal elongation [15]. Finally,
PGA34 encode a secreted and cell surface-associated protein
of unknown function.Taken together, these data provide a portrait of the processes involved in
epithelial damage. Firstly, the specific epithelial damage defects of these
group 4 and 5 mutants demonstrate that initial epithelial invasion is not
sufficient to cause tissue destruction, but rather suggests a model whereby,
following adhesion and initial internalization, C. albicans
relies on a combination of active penetration, directed hyphal extension,
glycerol homeostasis and the expression of novel pathogenicity factors for
deeper invasion and for further inter-epithelial invasion and dissemination.
Secondly, the fact that mutants defective in thigmotropism and glycerol
homeostasis (group 4 and 5) were able to invade oral epithelial cells (induced
endocytosis and active penetration), but unable to invade enterocytes (active
penetration only) suggests that a combination of turgor pressure (glycerol
accumulation) and directed hyphal growth is specifically required for fungal
penetration at distinct stages of infection.In summary, our systematic molecular analysis provides a comprehensive picture of
the processes governing epithelial infection: from the fundamental involvement
of the core signaling pathways and hyphal formation to all stages of epithelial
interactions, to the specific roles of morphogenic plasticity in mediating
epithelial destruction.
Materials and Methods
Strains and media
Candida albicans strains SC5314 [20], [45], BWP17 [46] carrying
CIp30 [47],
RM1000 [48]
and CAI-4 carrying CIp10 [49] were used as wild type controls. The genotypes of all
C. albicans strains used in this study are listed in Table S6.
All strains were maintained on YPD plates (1% peptone, 1% yeast
extract, 2% glucose, 2% agar). For use in the experiments,
C. albicans cells from an overnight YPD culture were either
diluted to OD600 = 0.2 in fresh liquid YPD
medium and grown to log phase for a further 4 h at 30°C or semi-synchronized
for further 24 h in liquid YPD medium at 30°C [50]. C.
albicans cells were then harvested by centrifugation, counted with
a hemacytometer and adjusted to the desired concentration in serum-free DMEM
medium (containing 2 mM L-glutamine) immediately prior to the experiment.
Mutant strain construction
Strain BWP17 [46] was used to create mutant strains. Null mutants
lacking orf19.691 (GPD2), orf19.5437 (GPP1),
orf19.851, orf19.2833 (PGA34), orf19.3459, orf19.3600, orf19.6837 were
constructed as previously described using pFA-His and pFA-Arg plasmids [51]. Briefly,
cassettes for transformation were amplified with primers which included >100
bp of gene specific sequences at their 5′ end and the corresponding
annealing regions to the pFA vector at the 3′ end. Disruption primers are
listed in Table
S7. Finally, URA3 was integrated into the
RPS1 locus via integration of CIp10 [52].Transformation was performed according to Walther and Wendland [53]. A
parental strain was created by integrating CIp30 (URA3;
HIS1; ARG4) [47] into the
RPS1 locus of BWP17. CIp10 and CIp30 were kindly provided
by Alistair Brown, Aberdeen. All experimental strains were compared with the
wild type (SC5314) and parental strain (BWP17+ pCIp30). All gene
manipulations and mutants produced in this study were confirmed by PCR and
Southern blot analysis.
Epithelial cells
The colon adenocarcinoma derived cell line Caco-2 was obtained from the American
Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (HTB 27). Caco-2 cell monolayers displayed
several morphological and functional characteristics of mature enterocytes [54]. These
cells were routinely cultured (passages 4 to 25) in DMEM medium supplemented
with 10% FCS, 1 mM pyruvic acid, 2 mM L-glutamine and 0.1 mM
non-essential amino acids (all media from Biochrom AG, Berlin, Germany), without
antibiotics or antifungal agents. The squamous carcinoma of buccal mucosa
derived epithelial cell line TR146 was obtained from Cancer Research Technology,
London [55].
TR146 cells were routinely grown (passages 4 to 20) in DMEM medium with
10% FCS, 1 mM pyruvic acid and 2 mM L-glutamine, without antibiotics or
antifungal agents. The RHOE for epithelial multilayers was based on cultured
TR146 cells and supplied by SkinEthic Laboratories (Nice, France). The RHOE was
maintained in serum-free Maintenance medium (SkinEthic), on a 0.5 cm2
microporous polycarbonate filter (insert) [56]. All cell types were
maintained in a humidified incubator at 37°C in 5% CO2.
For standard experiments, 1×105 of TR146 or Caco-2 cells,
respectively, were seeded onto acetic acid treated 15 mm diameter glass
coverslips previously placed in 24-well plates and cultured up to 21 days
post-seeding.
Adherence assay
C. albicans adherence to oral epithelial cells was determined
using fluorescence microscopy. TR146 cells were grown on 15 mm glass coverslips
for two days and inoculated with exactly 1×105
C. albicans cells (without centrifugation). Next the cells were
co-incubated for 1 h in DMEM medium without FBS. For the time course of
C. albicans adherence to oral epithelial cells, C.
albicans cells were incubated on a TR146 monolayer for 20 min, 1 h,
2 h or 3 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. After co-incubation,
non-adherent cells were removed by extensively rinsing five times with PBS and
fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Next, host cells were permeabilized with
0.5% Triton X-100. Adherent C. albicans cells were
stained with calcofluor white and quantified by epifluorescence (Leica DM5500B,
Leica DFC360 FX) using a filter set to detect calcofluor white. The number of
adherent cells was determined by counting of at least 100 high power fields of
320 µm ×240 µm size. Exact total cell numbers were calculated
based on the quantified areas and the total size of the cover slip. Each
condition was tested in duplicates, and at least three separate experiments were
performed.
Invasion assay
The number of C. albicans cells that invaded epithelial cells
was determined using a protocol derived from Park et al. (2005)
[31].
Briefly, epithelial cells were grown on 15 mm diameter glass coverslips for 2
days (monolayers of TR-146 cells) or 15–21 days post-seeding (monolayers
of differentiated Caco-2 cells). The monolayers were infected with
1×105 log phase yeast cells of C. albicans
and placed in a humidified incubator. After 3 h incubation, the medium covering
the cells was aspirated and monolayers were rinsed three times with PBS to
remove fungal cells, which were not associated with epithelial cells. Note that
by 3 h incubation virtually all (>98%) wild type fungal cells become
attached to the monolayer. For epithelial membrane staining, the cells were
incubated with Vybrant DiI cell-labeling solution (Molecular Probes, USA)
1∶20 in DMEM for 5 min in a humidified incubator at 37°C. Next, the
epithelial cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Roth). All fungal
cells remaining adherent to the surface of the epithelial cells were stained for
1 h with green-fluorescent Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate of succinylated
concanavalin A (Con A) (Invitrogen) (note: ConA stains only the extracellular,
non-invaded fungal elements). After rinsing with PBS, epithelial cells were
permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5–10 min. Next,
complete fungal cells (i.e. invaded and non-invaded) were
stained with calcofluor white. The coverslips were then rinsed with water,
mounted inverted onto slides, and the stained cells were visualized with
epifluorescence (Leica DM5500B, Leica DFC360 FX) using filter sets to detect
Alexa Fluor 488, 568 and calcofluor. The percentage of invading C.
albicans cells was determined by dividing the number of
[partially] internalized cells by the total number of adherent cells.
At least 100 fungal cells were counted on each coverslip and all experiments
were performed in duplicates on at least three separate occasions. Images were
taken with a Leica Digital Camera DFC360 FX.
Damage assay
Epithelial cell damage caused by different C. albicans strains
during interaction with TR146 cells was determined by the release of lactate
dehydrogenase (LDH) into the surrounding medium following 24 h uninterrupted
co-incubation with C. albicans. TR146 monolayers were grown to
95% confluency in 96 well culture plates and infected with
2×104 cells in DMEM with 1% FCS and placed in a
humidified incubator. For control samples, TR146 cells were incubated with DMEM
medium only or DMEM containing 0.5% Trion X-100; additionally, C.
albicans cells were seeded without epithelial cells. For measuring
the damage of epithelial multilayers, the RHOE was infected with
2×106
Candida cells in 50 µl PBS. Non-infected controls
contained 50 µl PBS alone. After 24 h extracellular LDH release into the
medium was measured spectrophotometrically at 492 nm using the Cytotoxicity
Detection Kit (LDH) from Roche Applied Science according to the
manufacturer's instructions. The percentage cytotoxicity of epithelial
cells infected with C. albicans cells was calculated as
follows: experimental LDH release minus background cells minus background
Candida/mean maximal LDH release minus background cells and
compared to 100% WT. Compared to experimental LDH release by Triton X-100
treatment, the tested wild type strains released 41% LDH. All experiments
were performed in triplicates for each condition and repeated three times. For
statistical analysis, p-values <0.05 were considered as
significant.
Isolation of C. albicans RNA
C. albicans cells suspended in pre-warmed DMEM medium were added
to 6 well polystyrene tissue culture plates containing oral epithelial cells. As
a control, organisms were added to empty tissue culture plates that did not
contain host cells (hereafter called plastic). In all experiments, the final
concentration of organisms was 1×106 per well and the same RNA
extraction procedure was used for both the experimental and control conditions.
Fungal cells were incubated with host cells or plastic for 20, 60 or 180 min. At
the end of each incubation period, the medium containing non-adherent fungal
cells was removed. To reduce the amount of host cell RNA and to stop RNA
transcription, PeqGold RNApure reagent (Peqlab) was added to each well and
afterwards snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. The total time from rinsing cells to
freezing in liquid nitrogen was less than 5 min. After thawing, fungal cells
were collected by centrifugation and supernatants were removed to decrease the
amount of human RNA. Next, the pellet was resuspended in AE-buffer (50 mM
Na-acetate pH 5.3, 10 mM EDTA, 1% SDS). After addition of
phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol (25∶24∶1) cells were heated for 5
min 65°C and immediately shock frozen. Next, cells were thawed on ice and
fungal RNA was precipitated by addition of isopropanol and sodium acetate and
incubation at −20°C over night. The quality of RNA was determined
using a Bioanalyzer (Agilent Inc.) and the quantity was measured with nanodrop
ND1000 (Peqlab).
cDNA labeling and microarray hybridization
Preparation and labeling of cDNA and hybridization of microarrays were performed
following standard protocols. Total RNA was linearly amplified and labeled using
the ‘Low RNA Input Fluorescent Linear amplification Kit’ (Agilent
Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Briefly, 10 µg of total RNA was
reverse transcribed with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) in
the presence of 5-(3-aminoallyl)-2′-deoxyuridine 5′- triphosphate
(aa-dUTP), using both oligo dT and random primers (Stratagene). For
transcriptional profiling, we used C. albicans microarrays
(Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) as described [21]. Sample RNA, Cy5- labeled)
was co-hybridized at a ratio of 1∶1 with a ‘common reference’
(RNA from SC5314 grown in YPD, mid-log phase, 37°C, Cy3-labelled), making
dye swap controls unnecessary. Slides were hybridized, washed and scanned as
described [21]. The arrays were visualized with 428TM array scanner
(Affymetrix). At least three hybridizations were performed for each time point.
Data normalization (LOWESS) and analysis were performed using GeneSpring GX
10.0.1 software (Agilent Technologies). Reliable expression of genes was defined
as normalized expression of present genes that did not vary more than 1.5
standard deviations within replicate arrays. Genes with a signal value greater
than the cut-off 50 were stated as specifically regulated and false positive
were excluded according to the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure [57]. Entities
where at least 50% of the samples in any 3 out of 6 conditions have
values within the cut-off. Genes which showed 1.5- to 2-fold changes compared
with the plastic control or the common reference were considered as
‘increased’ and ≥2-fold as ‘up-regulated’. All
microarray data are MIAME compliant and raw data have been deposited at
ArrayExpress (Accession number: E-MEXP-3015).
Real-time RT-PCR
The validity of the microarray results was assessed for 8 selected key genes by
real-time RT-PCR using SYBR green detection in a Mx3000P QPCR System (Agilent
technologies). RNA samples extracted for microarray analysis were used. First
genomic DNA was digested with Baseline-ZERO™ DNase (Epicentre
Biotechnologies). Complete removal was checked by PCR for each RNA sample.
First-Strand cDNA were synthesized with the SuperScript® III First-Strand
Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. Genes
investigated were CRP1, OPT9, orf19.6835,
PGA37/orf19.3923, GPP1, orf19.3600,
ECE1 and ALS3. The primers used in these
experiments are listed on Table S7. Each primer pair was tested for
cross reactivity with epithelial cDNA. Relative transcript abundance was
determined with the 2 –ΔΔCt method [58] using the transcript level
of CaACT1 and CaEFB1 as internal controls. For
the time points 60 min and 180 min, 8 genes were analyzed in at least three
biological replicates and the results were combined. Overall, the change in
expression of all genes tested by qRT-PCR was in agreement with the direction of
fold change as determined by microarray analysis.
Measurement of intracellular glycerol
The intracellular glycerol content of C. albicans SC5314,
gpd2Δ and gpp1Δ were measured with
a commercial quantitative colorimetric determination kit
(EnzyChrom™Glycerol Assay Kit, BioAssay Systems, Hayward, USA) following
the manufacturer instructions. Briefly, cells were grown overnight in selection
media (SD). The overnight culture was re-inoculated in YPD to
OD600 = 0.2 and grown for additional 4 h at
30°C. Next, cells were treated with 0.5 M NaCl for 45 min by adding 10 ml of
1 M NaCl in YPD, or treated with YPD only as control. Afterwards, cells were
collected by centrifugation and washed twice with water. One ml was heated at
95°C for 10 min and then centrifuged at 500 rpm for 30 s. The supernatant
was used for glycerol determination. Glycerol concentrations were normalized to
the wet weight of each pellet.
Statistical analyses
The data were analyzed using a Student's T-test to compare means. For these
analyzes, p values of <0.05 were considered to be
significant. For some experiments we chose to set the level of significance for
tests at p<0.01.Description of genes selected for analyses in this study.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.Morphology of C. albicans wild type and mutant strains
(hyphal, pseudohyphal and yeast cells formation in %) and length of
the formed filaments following 3 h incubation on epithelial monolayers.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.Summarized phenotypes of C. albicans wild type and mutant
strains during interaction with epithelial cells. Comparison of published
data to adhesion, invasion and damage properties of all strains investigated
in this study.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.C. albicans genes significantly up- and down-regulated in
response to oral epithelial cells as compared to YPD cultured C.
albicans cells (common reference) at 20, 60, and 180 min.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.C. albicans genes with significant changes in transcript
levels in response to oral epithelial cells as compared to plastic by
microarray analyses at different time points.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.List of the genotypes of C. albicans strains used in this
study.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.Primers used in this study for gene disruption and quantitative real-time
RT-PCR.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Hyunsook Park; Yaoping Liu; Norma Solis; Joshua Spotkov; Jessica Hamaker; Jill R Blankenship; Michael R Yeaman; Aaron P Mitchell; Haoping Liu; Scott G Filler Journal: Eukaryot Cell Date: 2009-08-21
Authors: Duncan Wilson; François L Mayer; Pedro Miramón; Francesco Citiulo; Silvia Slesiona; Ilse D Jacobsen; Bernhard Hube Journal: Eukaryot Cell Date: 2014-03-07