Adaora A Adimora1, Judith D Auerbach. 1. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599 , USA. adimora@med.unc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Structural interventions change the environment in which people act to influence their health behaviors. Most structural interventions research for HIV infection has focused on developing countries, with the United States receiving substantially less attention. This article identifies some social determinants of HIV vulnerability in the United States and structural interventions to address them. METHODS: Review of the medical, public health, and social science literature. RESULTS: Evidence supports widespread implementation of a number of structural interventions in the United States clearly proximate to HIV, including comprehensive sex education, universal condom availability, expanded syringe access for drug users, health care coverage, and stable housing. Sociological plausibility supports evaluation and implementation of other interventions that target social determinants more distal but of relevance to HIV, such as initiatives to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in criminal sentencing, to promote early childhood education and to decrease poverty. CONCLUSIONS: Structural interventions that address social determinants of HIV infection may be among the most cost effective methods of preventing HIV infection in the United States over the long term.
BACKGROUND: Structural interventions change the environment in which people act to influence their health behaviors. Most structural interventions research for HIV infection has focused on developing countries, with the United States receiving substantially less attention. This article identifies some social determinants of HIV vulnerability in the United States and structural interventions to address them. METHODS: Review of the medical, public health, and social science literature. RESULTS: Evidence supports widespread implementation of a number of structural interventions in the United States clearly proximate to HIV, including comprehensive sex education, universal condom availability, expanded syringe access for drug users, health care coverage, and stable housing. Sociological plausibility supports evaluation and implementation of other interventions that target social determinants more distal but of relevance to HIV, such as initiatives to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in criminal sentencing, to promote early childhood education and to decrease poverty. CONCLUSIONS: Structural interventions that address social determinants of HIV infection may be among the most cost effective methods of preventing HIV infection in the United States over the long term.
Authors: John Santelli; Mary A Ott; Maureen Lyon; Jennifer Rogers; Daniel Summers; Rebecca Schleifer Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Paul M Pronyk; James R Hargreaves; Julia C Kim; Linda A Morison; Godfrey Phetla; Charlotte Watts; Joanna Busza; John D H Porter Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-12-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: David W Pantalone; Kimberly M Nelson; Abigail W Batchelder; Christopher Chiu; Hamish A Gunn; Keith J Horvath Journal: J Sex Res Date: 2020-02-20
Authors: Kim M Williams; Raekiela D Taylor; Thomas Painter; William L Jeffries; Cynthia Prather; Pilgrim Spikes; Mesfin S Mulatu; Kirk Henny; Tamika Hoyte; Stephen A Flores Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2018 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Starr Hilliard; Elizabeth Bukusi; Shelly Grabe; Tiffany Lu; Abigail M Hatcher; Zachary Kwena; Esther Mwaura-Muiru; Shari L Dworkin Journal: Violence Against Women Date: 2016-07-09