Literature DB >> 21404034

Five-year outcome of stand-alone fusion using carbon cages in cervical disc arthrosis.

N Marotta1, A Landi, R Tarantino, C Mancarella, A Ruggeri, R Delfini.   

Abstract

From January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003, in the Neurosurgery Department of Rome University o "Sapienza," 167 patients underwent anterior surgery for cervical spondylodiscoarthrosis. The levels treated by the anterior stand-alone technique were: C3-C4 (11%), C4-C5 (19%), C5-C6 (40%), and C6-C7 (30%). All patients underwent left anterior presternocleidomastoid-precarotid approach, microdiscectomy, and interbody fusion using a carbon fiber cage filled with hydroxyapatite. All patients were discharged within 48 h after surgery with cervical orthosis. In one case, a hematoma of the surgical site occurred within 12 h of surgery; for this reason the patient underwent surgical revision and was discharged 4 days later. All patients have worn cervical orthosis for a mean period of 7 weeks and underwent radiological follow-up with cervical RX at 1 and 3 months after surgery. All patients underwent follow-up from 54 to 90 months after surgery, and all of them underwent cervical RX, cervical CT scans for the estimate of fusion, and evaluation of neurological status using VAS and NDI. Of 167 patients, 132 were cooperative for this study, 18 were non-cooperative, and 17 died. The estimation of fusion made by cervical CT scans with sagittal reconstruction showed complete osteointegration of the cage in 115 patients (87.1%), while it showed pseudoarthrosis in 17 patients (12.9%). In 24 patients, we observed adjacent segment degeneration, and 13 of these underwent new surgical procedures in this institute or in another hospital. Clinical evaluation with VAS and NDI showed a good outcome, with poorest benefit in patients over 60 years. The clinical analysis showed a good fusion rate in according with literature, 13% of non-fusion rate without clinical evidence and 20% of ASDegeneration but only 10% had required new surgery. We also observed that patients over 60 years of age had less satisfactory outcome, probably related with the evolution of pathophysiological degeneration of the cervical spine. In the opinion, pseudoarthrosis is caused by malpositioning of the carbon fiber cage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21404034      PMCID: PMC3087048          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1747-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  15 in total

1.  Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis.

Authors:  A S Hilibrand; G D Carlson; M A Palumbo; P K Jones; H H Bohlman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Use of carbon fiber cages for treatment of cervical myeloradiculopathies.

Authors:  Angelo Tancredi; Antonino Agrillo; Roberto Delfini; Dario Fiume; Alessandro Frati; Alessandro Rinaldi
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2004-03

3.  A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Mechanical testing.

Authors:  J W Brantigan; A D Steffee; J M Geiger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Anterior plate stabilization for fracture-dislocations of the lower cervical spine.

Authors:  J Böhler; T Gaudernak
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1980-03

5.  A comparative analysis of fusion rates and donor-site morbidity for autogeneic rib and iliac crest bone grafts in posterior cervical fusions.

Authors:  P D Sawin; V C Traynelis; A H Menezes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Morbidity at bone graft donor sites.

Authors:  E M Younger; M W Chapman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy.

Authors:  H Baba; N Furusawa; S Imura; N Kawahara; H Tsuchiya; K Tomita
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Long term outcome and adjacent disc degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium cylindrical cages.

Authors:  Taku Sugawara; Yasunobu Itoh; Yoshitaka Hirano; Naoki Higashiyama; Kazuo Mizoi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma.

Authors:  W Caspar; D D Barbier; P M Klara
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.

Authors:  H Vernon; S Mior
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.437

View more
  22 in total

1.  Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Differential segmental motion contribution of single- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Andy Chien; Dar-Ming Lai; Shwu-Fen Wang; Chih-Hsiu Cheng; Wei-Li Hsu; Jaw-Lin Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Adjacent Segment Pathology After Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Part 2: Clinical Results at 7-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Pierce D Nunley; Eubulus J Kerr; David A Cavanaugh; Phillip Andrew Utter; Peter G Campbell; Rishi Wadhwa; Kelly A Frank; Kyle E Marshall; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

4.  A minimum 2-year comparative study of autologous cancellous bone grafting versus beta-tricalcium phosphate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a rectangular titanium stand-alone cage.

Authors:  Toru Yamagata; Kentaro Naito; Hironori Arima; Masaki Yoshimura; Kenji Ohata; Toshihiro Takami
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Comparison of outcomes and safety of using hydroxyapatite granules as a substitute for autograft in cervical cages for anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hosein Mashhadinezhad; Fariborz Samini; Reza Zare
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-03-15

6.  Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion using PEEK anatomical cervical cage and allograft bone.

Authors:  C Faldini; M Chehrassan; M T Miscione; F Acri; M d'Amato; C Pungetti; D Luciani; S Giannini
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-11-17

7.  Airway compromise due to wound hematoma following anterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Mark A Palumbo; Jessica Pelow Aidlen; Alan H Daniels; Nikhil A Thakur; Joseph Caiati
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-03-05

8.  Biomechanical stability of a bioabsorbable self-retaining polylactic acid/nano-sized β-tricalcium phosphate cervical spine interbody fusion device in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion sheep models.

Authors:  Lu Cao; Ping-Guo Duan; Xi-Lei Li; Feng-Lai Yuan; Ming-Dong Zhao; Wu Che; Hui-Ren Wang; Jian Dong
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-11-27

9.  Risk factors for subsidence in anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a review of 82 cases and 182 levels.

Authors:  Ting-Hsien Kao; Chen-Hao Wu; Yu-Ching Chou; Hsien-Te Chen; Wen-Hsien Chen; Hsi-Kai Tsou
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Adjacent Segment Pathology after Anterior Cervical Fusion.

Authors:  Jae Yoon Chung; Jong-Beom Park; Hyoung-Yeon Seo; Sung Kyu Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.