OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, acceptability, and feasibility of positron emission tomography (PET) using carbon 11-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B ([(11)C]PiB) to measure cerebral β-amyloid in adults with Down syndrome (DS) and to explore if the technique differentiates between participants with and without Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN: Proof-of-principle case-controlled study of a nonrandomly selected cohort of participants with DS (with or without AD) compared within group and with healthy controls without DS. All had dynamic [(11)C]PiB PET and magnetic resonance imaging. Carbon 11-labeled PiB binding in the regions of interest associated with AD was quantitatively analyzed. SETTING: Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Cambridge, England. PARTICIPANTS: Nine with DS (aged 25-64 years), of whom 5 had a diagnosis of AD, and 14 healthy controls without DS (aged 33-69 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Positive [(11)C]PiB binding in regions of interest. RESULTS: The scanning process was feasible and acceptable with no adverse events or safety concerns. Maps and regional values of nondisplaceable binding potential were produced using the reference tissue-input Logan plot, with the cerebellum used as the reference tissue. When compared with the healthy control group without DS, only participants with DS older than 45 years had significant [(11)C]PiB binding in regions of interest usually associated with AD, whether or not they had clinical evidence of dementia. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic [(11)C]PiB PET can be used successfully to measure cerebral β-amyloid deposition in DS. A clinical diagnosis of AD and age appear to be predictors of [(11)C]PiB binding in regions of interest, but given the small numbers, we cannot generalize the results.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, acceptability, and feasibility of positron emission tomography (PET) using carbon 11-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B ([(11)C]PiB) to measure cerebral β-amyloid in adults with Down syndrome (DS) and to explore if the technique differentiates between participants with and without Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN: Proof-of-principle case-controlled study of a nonrandomly selected cohort of participants with DS (with or without AD) compared within group and with healthy controls without DS. All had dynamic [(11)C]PiB PET and magnetic resonance imaging. Carbon 11-labeled PiB binding in the regions of interest associated with AD was quantitatively analyzed. SETTING: Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Cambridge, England. PARTICIPANTS: Nine with DS (aged 25-64 years), of whom 5 had a diagnosis of AD, and 14 healthy controls without DS (aged 33-69 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Positive [(11)C]PiB binding in regions of interest. RESULTS: The scanning process was feasible and acceptable with no adverse events or safety concerns. Maps and regional values of nondisplaceable binding potential were produced using the reference tissue-input Logan plot, with the cerebellum used as the reference tissue. When compared with the healthy control group without DS, only participants with DS older than 45 years had significant [(11)C]PiB binding in regions of interest usually associated with AD, whether or not they had clinical evidence of dementia. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic [(11)C]PiB PET can be used successfully to measure cerebral β-amyloid deposition in DS. A clinical diagnosis of AD and age appear to be predictors of [(11)C]PiB binding in regions of interest, but given the small numbers, we cannot generalize the results.
Authors: Marwan N Sabbagh; Kewei Chen; Joseph Rogers; Adam S Fleisher; Carolyn Liebsack; Dan Bandy; Christine Belden; Hillary Protas; Pradeep Thiyyagura; Xiaofen Liu; Auttawut Roontiva; Ji Luo; Sandra Jacobson; Michael Malek-Ahmadi; Jessica Powell; Eric M Reiman Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-04-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Eric E Abrahamson; Elizabeth Head; Ira T Lott; Benjamin L Handen; Elliott J Mufson; Bradley T Christian; William E Klunk; Milos D Ikonomovic Journal: Dev Neurobiol Date: 2019-08-17 Impact factor: 3.964
Authors: Sylvia E Perez; Jennifer C Miguel; Bin He; Michael Malek-Ahmadi; Eric E Abrahamson; Milos D Ikonomovic; Ira Lott; Eric Doran; Melissa J Alldred; Stephen D Ginsberg; Elliott J Mufson Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Eric Doran; David Keator; Elizabeth Head; Michael J Phelan; Ron Kim; Minodora Totoiu; Jorge R Barrio; Gary W Small; Steven G Potkin; Ira T Lott Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: David Powell; Allison Caban-Holt; Gregory Jicha; William Robertson; Roberta Davis; Brian T Gold; Frederick A Schmitt; Elizabeth Head Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Sergey V Matveev; Hans Peter Spielmann; Brittney M Metts; Jing Chen; Fredrick Onono; Haining Zhu; Stephen W Scheff; Lary C Walker; Harry LeVine Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2014-07-28 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: Benjamin L Handen; Ann D Cohen; Umapathy Channamalappa; Peter Bulova; Sheila A Cannon; William I Cohen; Chester A Mathis; Julie C Price; William E Klunk Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 21.566