BACKGROUND: Plasma exchange (PLEX) is a beneficial rescue therapy for acute, steroid-refractory central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease (CNS-IDD). Despite the approximately 45% PLEX response rate reported among patients with CNS-IDD, determinants of interindividual differences in PLEX response are not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: To perform an exploratory analysis of clinical, radiographic, and serological features associated with beneficial PLEX response. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Neurology practice, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Patients All Mayo Clinic patients treated with PLEX between January 5, 1999, and November 12, 2007, for a steroid-refractory CNS-IDD attack. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The PLEX response in attack-related, targeted neurological deficit(s) assessed within the 6-month period following PLEX. RESULTS: We identified 153 patients treated with PLEX for a steroid-refractory CNS-IDD, of whom 90 (59%) exhibited moderate to marked functional neurological improvement within 6 months following treatment. Pre-PLEX clinical features associated with a beneficial PLEX response were shorter disease duration (P = .02) and preserved deep tendon reflexes (P = .001); post-PLEX variables included a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (P = .008) and a lower Expanded Disability Status Scale score (P < .001) at last follow-up. Plasma exchange was less effective for patients with multiple sclerosis who subsequently developed a progressive disease course (P = .046). Radiographic features associated with a beneficial PLEX response were presence of ring-enhancing lesions (odds ratio = 4.00; P = .03) and/or mass effect (odds ratio = 3.00; P = .02). No association was found between neuromyelitis optica-IgG serostatus and PLEX response. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified clinical and radiographic features that may aid in identifying patients with fulminant, steroid-refractory CNS-IDD attacks who are more likely to respond to PLEX.
BACKGROUND: Plasma exchange (PLEX) is a beneficial rescue therapy for acute, steroid-refractory central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease (CNS-IDD). Despite the approximately 45% PLEX response rate reported among patients with CNS-IDD, determinants of interindividual differences in PLEX response are not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: To perform an exploratory analysis of clinical, radiographic, and serological features associated with beneficial PLEX response. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Neurology practice, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Patients All Mayo Clinic patients treated with PLEX between January 5, 1999, and November 12, 2007, for a steroid-refractory CNS-IDD attack. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The PLEX response in attack-related, targeted neurological deficit(s) assessed within the 6-month period following PLEX. RESULTS: We identified 153 patients treated with PLEX for a steroid-refractory CNS-IDD, of whom 90 (59%) exhibited moderate to marked functional neurological improvement within 6 months following treatment. Pre-PLEX clinical features associated with a beneficial PLEX response were shorter disease duration (P = .02) and preserved deep tendon reflexes (P = .001); post-PLEX variables included a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (P = .008) and a lower Expanded Disability Status Scale score (P < .001) at last follow-up. Plasma exchange was less effective for patients with multiple sclerosis who subsequently developed a progressive disease course (P = .046). Radiographic features associated with a beneficial PLEX response were presence of ring-enhancing lesions (odds ratio = 4.00; P = .03) and/or mass effect (odds ratio = 3.00; P = .02). No association was found between neuromyelitis optica-IgG serostatus and PLEX response. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified clinical and radiographic features that may aid in identifying patients with fulminant, steroid-refractory CNS-IDD attacks who are more likely to respond to PLEX.
Authors: M Tintoré; A Rovira; M J Martínez; J Rio; P Díaz-Villoslada; L Brieva; C Borrás; E Grivé; J Capellades; X Montalban Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: B G Weinshenker; P C O'Brien; T M Petterson; J H Noseworthy; C F Lucchinetti; D W Dodick; A A Pineda; L N Stevens; M Rodriguez Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: S Llufriu; J Castillo; Y Blanco; L Ramió-Torrentà; J Río; M Vallès; M Lozano; M D Castellà; J Calabia; A Horga; F Graus; X Montalban; Albert Saiz Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Dean M Wingerchuk; Vanda A Lennon; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Sean J Pittock; Brian G Weinshenker Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Lidia Stork; David Ellenberger; Tim Beißbarth; Tim Friede; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Wolfgang Brück; Imke Metz Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 18.302