Literature DB >> 10782781

Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

M Tintoré1, A Rovira, M J Martínez, J Rio, P Díaz-Villoslada, L Brieva, C Borrás, E Grivé, J Capellades, X Montalban.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Various authors have developed criteria to classify MR imaging findings that suggest the possibility of multiple sclerosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the capacity of three sets of MR imaging criteria for predicting the conversion of isolated demyelinating syndromes to clinically definite multiple sclerosis.
METHODS: Seventy patients with clinically isolated neurologic symptoms suggestive of multiple sclerosis were prospectively studied with MR imaging. The MR imaging findings were evaluated by two independent neuroradiologists who were blinded to clinical follow-up data. Based on the clinical outcome at follow-up (presence of a second attack that established clinically definite multiple sclerosis), the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the criteria proposed by Paty et al, Fazekas et al, and Barkhof et al were calculated.
RESULTS: Clinically definite multiple sclerosis developed in 22 (31%) patients after a mean follow-up time of 28.3 months. The criteria proposed by Paty et al and those proposed by Fazekas et al showed identical results: sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 54%; accuracy, 64%; positive predictive value, 46%; and negative predictive value, 89%. The criteria proposed by Barkhof et al showed the following: sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 73%; accuracy, 73%; positive predictive value, 55%; and negative predictive value, 85%.
CONCLUSION: The four dichotomized MR imaging parameters proposed by Barkhof et al are more specific and accurate than the criteria proposed by Paty et al or Fazekas et al for predicting conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10782781      PMCID: PMC7976636     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  26 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of acute partial transverse myelopathy.

Authors:  B Ford; D Tampieri; G Francis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  MR brain scanning in patients with vasculitis: differentiation from multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D H Miller; I E Ormerod; A Gibson; E P du Boulay; P Rudge; W I McDonald
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  The early risk of multiple sclerosis following isolated acute syndromes of the brainstem and spinal cord.

Authors:  D H Miller; I E Ormerod; P Rudge; B E Kendall; I F Moseley; W I McDonald
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Guidelines for the use of magnetic resonance techniques in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis. US National MS Society Task Force.

Authors:  D H Miller; P S Albert; F Barkhof; G Francis; J A Frank; S Hodgkinson; F D Lublin; D W Paty; S C Reingold; J Simon
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Assessment of MRI criteria for a diagnosis of MS.

Authors:  H Offenbacher; F Fazekas; R Schmidt; W Freidl; E Flooh; F Payer; H Lechner
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols.

Authors:  C M Poser; D W Paty; L Scheinberg; W I McDonald; F A Davis; G C Ebers; K P Johnson; W A Sibley; D H Silberberg; W W Tourtellotte
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  Comparison of MR pulse sequences in the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions.

Authors:  T A Yousry; M Filippi; C Becker; M A Horsfield; R Voltz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the head in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a prospective 2-year follow-up with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT.

Authors:  K H Lee; S A Hashimoto; J P Hooge; L F Kastrukoff; J J Oger; D K Li; D W Paty
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  The effect of section thickness on MR lesion detection and quantification in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P D Molyneux; N Tubridy; G J Parker; G J Barker; D G MacManus; P S Tofts; I F Moseley; D H Miller
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  The effect of gadolinium on the sensitivity and specificity of MR in the initial diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M W Tas; F Barkhol; M A van Walderveen; C H Polman; O R Hommes; J Valk
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  75 in total

Review 1.  The radiologically isolated syndrome: take action when the unexpected is uncovered?

Authors:  Johann Sellner; Lucas Schirmer; Bernhard Hemmer; Mark Mühlau
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Does high-field MR imaging have an influence on the classification of patients with clinically isolated syndromes according to current diagnostic mr imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis?

Authors:  M P Wattjes; M Harzheim; C K Kuhl; J Gieseke; S Schmidt; L Klotz; T Klockgether; H H Schild; G G Lutterbey
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Higher sensitivity in the detection of inflammatory brain lesions in patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis using high field MRI: an intraindividual comparison of 1.5 T with 3.0 T.

Authors:  Mike P Wattjes; Götz G Lutterbey; Michael Harzheim; Jürgen Gieseke; Frank Träber; Luisa Klotz; Thomas Klockgether; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Multiple sclerosis: new insights and trends.

Authors:  M Inglese
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Interobserver agreement on the radiological criteria of the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Tijmen Korteweg; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Dirk L Knol; Robin H M Smithuis; Paul R Algra; Cees de Vries; Peter A Poppe; Jan-Hein T M van Waesberghe; Elisabeth Bergers; Geert J Lycklama à Nijeholt; Chris H Polman; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  [Revision of McDonald's new diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  H Wiendl; B C Kieseier; R Gold; R Hohlfeld; M Bendszus; H-P Hartung
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.214

7.  AQP4 antibody-positive Thai cases: clinical features and diagnostic problems.

Authors:  S Siritho; I Nakashima; T Takahashi; K Fujihara; N Prayoonwiwat
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  A cytoskeleton motor protein genetic variant may exert a protective effect on the occurrence of multiple sclerosis: the janus face of the kinesin light-chain 1 56836CC genetic variant.

Authors:  Zoltan Szolnoki; Andras Kondacs; Yvette Mandi; Ferenc Somogyvari
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Optimizing 3D FLAIR to detect MS lesions: pushing past factory settings for precise results.

Authors:  Augustin Lecler; C Bouzad; R Deschamps; F Maizeroi; J C Sadik; A Gueguen; O Gout; H Picard; J Savatovsky
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Prognostic value of high-field proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Mike P Wattjes; Michael Harzheim; Götz G Lutterbey; Manuela Bogdanow; Stephan Schmidt; Hans H Schild; Frank Träber
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-11-03       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.