James T Eckner1, Jeffrey S Kutcher, James K Richardson. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, 325 E. Eisenhower Pkwy, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA. jeckner@med.umich.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of concussion on clinically measured reaction time (RT(clin)) and in comparison to a computerized reaction time measure (RT(comp)). DESIGN: Prospective, repeated measures observational study. SETTING: Athletic training clinic at a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I university. PARTICIPANTS: Data are reported for 9 collegiate athletes with acute concussion who were part of a larger cohort of 209 athletes recruited from the university's football, women's soccer, and wrestling teams before the start of their respective athletic seasons. METHODS: Baseline RT(clin) and RT(comp) were measured during preparticipation physical examinations. RT(clin) measured the time required to catch a suspended vertical shaft by hand closure after its release by the examiner. RT(comp) was derived from the simple RT component of the CogState-Sport computerized neurocognitive test battery. Athletes who subsequently sustained a physician-diagnosed concussion underwent repeated RT(clin) and RT(comp) testing within 72 hours of injury. A Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare baseline and after-injury RTs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: After-injury changes in RT(clin) and RT(comp) were calculated with respect to each athlete's own preseason baseline value. RESULTS: After-injury RT(clin) was prolonged in 8 of the 9 athletes with concussions, whereas RT(comp) was prolonged in 5 of the 9 athletes with concussions. The mean (standard deviation) RT(clin) increased from 193 ± 21 ms to 219 ± 31 ms (P = .050), and mean RT(comp) increased from 247 ± 75 to 462 ± 120 ms (P = .214). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that RT(clin) appears to be sensitive to the known prolongation of RT after concussion and compares favorably with an accepted computerized RT measure. This study supports the potential utility of RT(clin) as part of a multifaceted concussion assessment battery.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of concussion on clinically measured reaction time (RT(clin)) and in comparison to a computerized reaction time measure (RT(comp)). DESIGN: Prospective, repeated measures observational study. SETTING: Athletic training clinic at a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I university. PARTICIPANTS: Data are reported for 9 collegiate athletes with acute concussion who were part of a larger cohort of 209 athletes recruited from the university's football, women's soccer, and wrestling teams before the start of their respective athletic seasons. METHODS: Baseline RT(clin) and RT(comp) were measured during preparticipation physical examinations. RT(clin) measured the time required to catch a suspended vertical shaft by hand closure after its release by the examiner. RT(comp) was derived from the simple RT component of the CogState-Sport computerized neurocognitive test battery. Athletes who subsequently sustained a physician-diagnosed concussion underwent repeated RT(clin) and RT(comp) testing within 72 hours of injury. A Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare baseline and after-injury RTs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: After-injury changes in RT(clin) and RT(comp) were calculated with respect to each athlete's own preseason baseline value. RESULTS: After-injury RT(clin) was prolonged in 8 of the 9 athletes with concussions, whereas RT(comp) was prolonged in 5 of the 9 athletes with concussions. The mean (standard deviation) RT(clin) increased from 193 ± 21 ms to 219 ± 31 ms (P = .050), and mean RT(comp) increased from 247 ± 75 to 462 ± 120 ms (P = .214). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that RT(clin) appears to be sensitive to the known prolongation of RT after concussion and compares favorably with an accepted computerized RT measure. This study supports the potential utility of RT(clin) as part of a multifaceted concussion assessment battery.
Authors: Michael McCrea; Leslie Prichep; Matthew R Powell; Robert Chabot; William B Barr Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Jaclyn B Caccese; James T Eckner; Lea Franco-MacKendrick; Joseph B Hazzard; Meng Ni; Steven P Broglio; Thomas W McAllister; Michael McCrea; Thomas A Buckley Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 2.860