Literature DB >> 21402204

Developing and testing the health literacy universal precautions toolkit.

Darren A DeWalt1, Kimberly A Broucksou, Victoria Hawk, Cindy Brach, Ashley Hink, Rima Rudd, Leigh Callahan.   

Abstract

The health literacy demands of the healthcare system often exceed the health literacy skills of Americans. This article reviews the development of the Health Literacy Universal Precautions (HLUP) Toolkit, commissioned by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and designed to help primary care practices structure the delivery of care as if every patient may have limited health literacy. The development of the toolkit spanned 2 years and consisted of 3 major tasks: (1) developing individual tools (modules explaining how to use or implement a strategy to minimize the effects of low health literacy), using existing health literacy resources when possible, (2) testing individual tools in clinical practice and assembling them into a prototype toolkit, and (3) testing the prototype toolkit in clinical practice. Testing revealed that practices will use tools that are concise and actionable and are not perceived as being resource intensive. Conducting practice self-assessments and generating enthusiasm among staff were key elements for successful implementation. Implementing practice changes required more time than anticipated and some knowledge of quality improvement techniques. In sum, the HLUP Toolkit holds promise as a means of improving primary care for people with limited health literacy, but further testing is needed.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21402204      PMCID: PMC5091930          DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Outlook        ISSN: 0029-6554            Impact factor:   3.250


  9 in total

1.  Information systems can prevent errors and improve quality.

Authors:  E A Balas
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  The gap between patient reading comprehension and the readability of patient education materials.

Authors:  T C Davis; M A Crouch; G Wills; S Miller; D M Abdehou
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Darren A Dewalt; Nancy D Berkman; Stacey Sheridan; Kathleen N Lohr; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Evidence does not support clinical screening of literacy.

Authors:  Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Developing and testing changes in delivery of care.

Authors:  D M Berwick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Limited literacy and mortality in the elderly: the health, aging, and body composition study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Sudore; Kristine Yaffe; Suzanne Satterfield; Tamara B Harris; Kala M Mehta; Eleanor M Simonsick; Anne B Newman; Caterina Rosano; Ronica Rooks; Susan M Rubin; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Residents' ability to identify patients with poor literacy skills.

Authors:  Pat F Bass; John F Wilson; Charles H Griffith; Don R Barnett
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Health literacy and mortality among elderly persons.

Authors:  David W Baker; Michael S Wolf; Joseph Feinglass; Jason A Thompson; Julie A Gazmararian; Jenny Huang
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-23
  9 in total
  68 in total

1.  Health Literacy Among Parents of Newborn Infants.

Authors:  Amy Mackley; Michael Winter; Ursula Guillen; David A Paul; Robert Locke
Journal:  Adv Neonatal Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.968

2.  How the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Promotes Health Literate Health Care.

Authors:  Cindy Brach; Amanda Borsky
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2020-06-25

3.  Good intentions are not enough: how informatics interventions can worsen inequality.

Authors:  Tiffany C Veinot; Hannah Mitchell; Jessica S Ancker
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of brief health literacy and numeracy screening instruments in an urban emergency department.

Authors:  Christopher R Carpenter; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Melody S Goodman; Margaret J Lin; Andrew T Melson; Richard T Griffey
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Development and validation of the numeracy understanding in Medicine Instrument short form.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Cindy M Walker; Tamara Miller; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Pamela S Ganschow; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Diana Imbert; Maria O'Connell; Joan M Neuner
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014

6.  Health Literacy and Informed Consent Materials: Designed for Documentation, Not Comprehension of Health Research.

Authors:  Vanessa Watts Simonds; Eva Marie Garroutte; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2017-07-31

7.  Communication and Shared Understanding Between Parents and Resident-Physicians at Night.

Authors:  Alisa Khan; Jayne E Rogers; Catherine S Forster; Stephannie L Furtak; Mark A Schuster; Christopher P Landrigan
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2016-06

8.  Perceptions of Provider Communication Among Vulnerable Patients With Diabetes: Influences of Medical Mistrust and Health Literacy.

Authors:  Richard O White; Rosette J Chakkalakal; Caroline A Presley; Aihua Bian; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Kenneth A Wallston; Shari Barto; Sunil Kripalani; Russell Rothman
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-09-23

9.  The impact of teach-back on comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among emergency patients with limited health literacy: A randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Nicole Shin; Solita Jones; Nnenna Aginam; Maureen Gross; Yonitte Kinsella; Jennifer A Williams; Christopher R Carpenter; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Commun Healthc       Date:  2015-03

Review 10.  Effects of the teach-back method among cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Seonhwa Choi; Jahyun Choi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.