Literature DB >> 21401958

Study protocol: addressing evidence and context to facilitate transfer and uptake of consultation recording use in oncology: a knowledge translation implementation study.

Thomas F Hack1, J Dean Ruether, Lorna M Weir, Debjani Grenier, Lesley F Degner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The time period from diagnosis to the end of treatment is challenging for newly diagnosed cancer patients. Patients have a substantial need for information, decision aids, and psychosocial support. Recordings of initial oncology consultations improve information recall, reduce anxiety, enhance patient satisfaction with communication, and increase patients' perceptions that the essential aspects of their disease and treatment have been addressed during the consultation. Despite the research evidence supporting the provision of consultation recordings, uptake of this intervention into oncology practice has been slow. The primary aim of this project is to conduct an implementation study to explicate the contextual factors, including use of evidence, that facilitate and impede the transfer and uptake of consultation-recording use in a sample of patients newly diagnosed with breast or prostate cancer.
METHODS: Sixteen oncologists from cancer centres in three Canadian cities will participate in this three-phase study. The preimplementation phase will be used to identify and address those factors that are fundamental to facilitating the smooth adoption and delivery of the intervention during the implementation phase. During the implementation phase, breast and prostate cancer patients will receive a recording of their initial oncology consultation to take home. Patient interviews will be conducted in the days following the consultation to gather feedback on the benefits of the intervention. Patients will complete the Digital Recording Use Semi-Structured Interview (DRUSSI) and be invited to participate in focus groups in which their experiences with the consultation recording will be explored. Oncologists will receive a summary letter detailing the benefits voiced by their patients. The postimplementation phase includes a conceptual framework development meeting and a seven-point dissemination strategy. DISCUSSION: Consultation recording has been used in oncology, family medicine, and other medicine specialties, and despite affirming evidence and probable applications to a large number of diseases and a variety of clinical contexts, clinical adoption of this intervention has been slow. The proposed study findings will advance our conceptual knowledge of the ways to enhance uptake of consultation recordings in oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21401958      PMCID: PMC3068117          DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implement Sci        ISSN: 1748-5908            Impact factor:   7.327


  32 in total

Review 1.  Getting evidence into practice: the role and function of facilitation.

Authors:  Gill Harvey; Alison Loftus-Hills; Jo Rycroft-Malone; Angie Titchen; Alison Kitson; Brendan McCormack; Kate Seers
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 2.  The PARIHS framework--a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Jo Rycroft-Malone
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.597

Review 3.  Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice.

Authors:  B Haynes; A Haines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-25

4.  Getting it taped: the 'bad news' consultation with cancer patients.

Authors:  B Hogbin; L Fallowfield
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1989-04

5.  Cancer and communication: information-giving in an oncology clinic.

Authors:  P M Reynolds; R W Sanson-Fisher; A D Poole; J Harker; M J Byrne
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-05-02

6.  Standardized audiotape versus recorded consultation to enhance informed consent to a clinical trial in breast oncology.

Authors:  Thomas F Hack; Tim Whelan; Ivo A Olivotto; Lorna Weir; Barry D Bultz; Bryan Magwood; Fred Ashbury; Jane Brady
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Effect of providing cancer patients with the audiotaped initial consultation on satisfaction, recall, and quality of life: a randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  L M Ong; M R Visser; F B Lammes; J van Der Velden; B C Kuenen; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework.

Authors:  Christian D Helfrich; Laura J Damschroder; Hildi J Hagedorn; Ginger S Daggett; Anju Sahay; Mona Ritchie; Teresa Damush; Marylou Guihan; Philip M Ullrich; Cheryl B Stetler
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  General information tapes inhibit recall of the cancer consultation.

Authors:  S M Dunn; P N Butow; M H Tattersall; Q J Jones; J S Sheldon; J J Taylor; M D Sumich
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Recordings or summaries of consultations for people with cancer.

Authors:  Marie Pitkethly; Stephen Macgillivray; Rebecca Ryan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16
View more
  3 in total

1.  Balancing exploration and exploitation in transferring research into practice: a comparison of five knowledge translation entity archetypes.

Authors:  Eivor Oborn; Michael Barrett; Karl Prince; Girts Racko
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  Advancing complexity science in healthcare research: the logic of logic models.

Authors:  Thomas Mills; Rebecca Lawton; Laura Sheard
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Information Access and Use by Patients With Cancer and Their Friends and Family: Development of a Grounded Theory.

Authors:  Maclean Thiessen; Shane Sinclair; Patricia A Tang; Shelley Raffin Bouchal
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.