Literature DB >> 18646075

Recordings or summaries of consultations for people with cancer.

Marie Pitkethly1, Stephen Macgillivray, Rebecca Ryan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many people find it difficult to remember information provided during medical consultations. One way of improving this may be to provide a record of the conversation.
OBJECTIVES: This review examined the effects of providing recordings or summaries of their consultations to people with cancer and their families. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the following sources: The Cochrane Library (issue 2 2007); MEDLINE (1966 to 29 May 2007); CINAHL (1982 to 29 May 2007); Dissertation Abstracts (1861 to 29 May 2007; Index to Theses 29 May 2007; EMBASE (1985 to 29 May 2007); PsycINFO (1967 to 29 May 2007); AMED (1985 to 29 May 2007); British Nursing Index (1985 to May 2007); SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI (1986 to 3 June 2007); and Sociological Abstracts (1998 to 29 May 2007). For the initial (1999) publication of this review we also searched the following databases: Sociofile; Cancerlit; IAC Health & Wellness; JICST; Pascal; ERIC; ASSIA; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts; Mental Health Abstracts; CAB Health; DHSS-Data; MANTIS. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that evaluate the effects of providing recordings (for example, audiotapes) or summaries (for example, a letter with reminders of key points) of consultations to people with cancer or their families. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors assessed studies for inclusion. Data were extracted by one author and checked by another author. We assessed study quality on seven criteria. We used a systematic approach to data extraction to produce a descriptive summary of studies, and present a narrative synthesis of the results. MAIN
RESULTS: We included sixteen controlled trials involving 2318 adult participants. The studies measured diverse outcomes. Many of the participants found recordings or summaries of their consultations valuable, with between 60% and 100% of participants (across twelve studies) reading the summary or listening to the recording at least once. The recordings were used to help inform family and friends (range 41.5% to 94.4% of participants in nine studies). Five out of nine studies reported better recall of information for those receiving recordings or summaries. Three out of ten studies found that participants provided with a recording or summary were more satisfied. No studies (out of ten) found any statistically significant difference between groups in terms of anxiety or depression. Three studies evaluated the effects on quality of life, but found no main effects. No study evaluated the intervention's effects on survival. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: The provision of recordings or summaries of key consultations may benefit most adults with cancer. Although more research is needed to improve our understanding of these interventions, most patients find them very useful. Practitioners should consider offering people recordings or written summaries of their consultations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18646075     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001539.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  20 in total

1.  Decision making about surgery for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Clara N Lee; Yuchiao Chang; Nesochi Adimorah; Jeff K Belkora; Beverly Moy; Ann H Partridge; David W Ollila; Karen R Sepucha
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Utility of a Referral Letter to Improve Comprehensibility of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care: a Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Eva-Marie Kloeppel; Hani Hanaya; Eckart Seilacher; Sarah Schroth; Patrick Liebl; Christian Keinki; Marie Jolin Koester; Jutta Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Coaching Older Adults and Carers to have their preferences Heard (COACH): A randomised controlled trial in an intermediate care setting (study protocol).

Authors:  Stacey Masters; Jason Gordon; Craig Whitehead; Owen Davies; Lynne C Giles; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2012-09-09

4.  Do patients use decision and communication aids as prompted when meeting with breast cancer specialists?

Authors:  Shelley Volz; Dan H Moore; Jeffrey K Belkora
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Patient, companion, and oncologist agreement regarding information discussed during triadic oncology clinical interactions.

Authors:  Susan Eggly; Louis A Penner; Nao Hagiwara; Richard Gonzalez; Felicity W K Harper; Elisabeth I Heath; Terrance L Albrecht
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Study protocol: addressing evidence and context to facilitate transfer and uptake of consultation recording use in oncology: a knowledge translation implementation study.

Authors:  Thomas F Hack; J Dean Ruether; Lorna M Weir; Debjani Grenier; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Smartphone standoff: a qualitative study exploring clinician responses when a patient uses a smartphone to record a hospital clinical encounter.

Authors:  Laura Ryan; Kelly Weir; Jessica Maskell; Robyne Le Brocque
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Physician behaviors surrounding the implementation of decision and communication AIDS in a breast cancer clinic: a qualitative analysis of staff intern perceptions.

Authors:  M Pass; S Volz; A Teng; L Esserman; J Belkora
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Response to a treatment summary and care plan among adult survivors of pediatric and young adult cancer.

Authors:  Peter D Spain; Kevin C Oeffinger; Joanne Candela; Mary McCabe; Xiaomei Ma; Emily S Tonorezos
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Improving health outcomes with better patient understanding and education.

Authors:  Robert John Adams
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.