Literature DB >> 21400220

Detection of selection utilizing molecular phylogenetics: a possible approach.

Ming Yang1, Gerald J Wyckoff.   

Abstract

The neutral theory of molecular evolution (Kimura 1985) is the basis for most current statistical tests for detecting selection, mainly using polymorphism data within species, divergence data between species, and/or genomic structures like linkage disequilibrium (Wang et al. 2006). In most cases informative tests can only be constructed with ample variations within these parameters and many common tests are difficult to formulate when identity-by-descent is not clear, for example in gene families or repetitive elements. With the current progress being made toward whole-genome sequencing and re-sequencing efforts, as well as protein sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry where genomic sequencing is lacking, we felt it was necessary to re-visit possible methods for rapid screening and detection of evolutionary outliers. These outliers might be of interest for other research, such as candidate gene association studies or genome annotations, drug- and disease-target searches, and functional studies. We focused on methods that would work on both protein and nucleotide data, could be used on large gene or protein domain families, and could be generated quickly in order for "first pass" annotation of large scale data. For these reasons, we chose properties of trees generated routinely in molecular phylogenetic studies; genetic distance, tree shape and balance, and internal node statistics (Heard 1992). Our current research looking at protein domain family data and phylogenetic trees from PFAM (Finn et al. 2008) suggests this approach towards detecting evolutionary outliers is feasible, but additional work will be necessary to determine the parameters that suggest either positive or negative selection is occurring in specific gene families. This is particularly true when other factors such as rapid duplication and deletion of genes containing these domains is taking place, and we suggest phylogenetic statistics may be useful in combination with existing methodologies for detailed studies of gene family data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21400220      PMCID: PMC3980844          DOI: 10.1007/s10709-011-9560-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  32 in total

Review 1.  Zinc finger domains: hypotheses and current knowledge.

Authors:  J M Berg
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem       Date:  1990

2.  SYMMETREE: whole-tree analysis of differential diversification rates.

Authors:  Kai M A Chan; Brian R Moore
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  On statistical tests of phylogenetic tree imbalance: the Sackin and other indices revisited.

Authors:  Michael G B Blum; Olivier François
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.144

4.  Gene duplication and the origin of novel proteins.

Authors:  Austin L Hughes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Comparative genomics and structural biology of the molecular innovations of eukaryotes.

Authors:  L Aravind; Lakshminarayan M Iyer; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Which random processes describe the tree of life? A large-scale study of phylogenetic tree imbalance.

Authors:  Michael G B Blum; Olivier François
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Global landscape of recent inferred Darwinian selection for Homo sapiens.

Authors:  Eric T Wang; Greg Kodama; Pierre Baldi; Robert K Moyzis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The neutral theory is dead. Long live the neutral theory.

Authors:  M Kreitman
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  Evolutionary conservation and diversification of Rh family genes and proteins.

Authors:  Cheng-Han Huang; Jianbin Peng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The molecular clock revisited: the rate of synonymous vs. replacement change in Drosophila.

Authors:  L W Zeng; J M Comeron; B Chen; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.