Literature DB >> 21399472

Femoral malrotation after unreamed intramedullary nailing: an evaluation of influencing operative factors.

Tobias Hüfner1, Mustafa Citak, Eduardo M Suero, Brian Miller, Daniel Kendoff, Christian Krettek, Musa Citak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine which clinical factors influence the presence and extent of femoral malrotation during unreamed nail insertion performed without a fracture table.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Academic trauma center. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated statically locked femoral nails inserted without reaming in either a retrograde or antegrade manner without the use of a fracture table between April 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005. All patients received postoperative computed tomography scans. Institutional radiographic threshold for revision surgery was 15° of either internal or external rotation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Postoperative computed tomography measurements of rotation were compared with the opposite side. Patients were grouped by 1) Orthopaedic Trauma Association fracture classification; 2) closed versus mini open reduction; 3) surgeon experience; 4) antegrade versus retrograde femoral nail; and 5) time of day surgery performed (day shift versus night shift). The following parameters were measured from the chart and x-ray: rotational malalignment, x-ray time, and duration of surgery.
RESULTS: There were 82 femurs in 82 patients, 59 men and 23 women, with a mean age of 32 years (range, 17-83 years). Eighteen femurs (22%) showed a malrotation of greater than 15°. Seven were internally malrotated (mean, 23°; range 16°-32°), whereas 11 were externally malrotated (mean, 24.2°; range, 16°-39.7°). After clinical examination, only 11 of the 18 patients (61%) underwent revision surgery, six patients for external malrotation (mean, 27.47°; range, 21.9°-39.7°) and five for internal malrotation (mean, 23.6°; range, 16°-32°). Malrotation varied significantly with fracture severity with Type C averaging 19.4° (24 patients), Type B 9° (26 patients), and Type A 6.6° (32 patients). No difference was found between an open and closed technique nor the experience of surgeon or the type of implant. There was a significant difference depending on the time of surgery in which an average malrotation of 15.2° (14 patients) was found on the night shift and an average malrotation of 10.3° (68 patients) was found during the day.
CONCLUSION: Rotational malalignment greater than 15° was found in 22% of femurs treated in this study. Fracture comminution and time of day the surgery was performed had the greatest effect on the severity of malrotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21399472     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e47e3b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  7 in total

Review 1.  [The relevant axial deviation: Diagnostics and therapy for correction osteotomies of the femur].

Authors:  F Baumann; K Angerpointner; M Nerlich; C Neumann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Accuracy of Low Dose Computed Tomography Scanogram for Measurement of Femoral Version after Locked Intramedullary Nailing.

Authors:  Kristi Lynn Hultman; Rahul Vaidya; Ibraheem Malkawi; Jon Brandon Carlson; Jason Benjamin Wynberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Is the Lesser Trochanter Profile a Reliable Means of Restoring Anatomic Rotation After Femur Fracture Fixation?

Authors:  Lucas S Marchand; Dane C Todd; Patrick Kellam; Temitope F Adeyemi; David L Rothberg; Travis G Maak
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The rotational fixator: A new device.

Authors:  T Omar Pacha; A Khalifa; T Graulich; H Alaidarous; M Omar; C Krettek; T Stubig
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-12-04

5.  CT analysis of femoral malrotation after intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Jakub Maléř; Valér Džupa; Michal Buk; Martin Michna; Jiří Marvan; Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  Distal femoral complications following antegrade intramedullary nail placement.

Authors:  Amanda J Fantry; Gregory Elia; Bryan G Vopat; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2015-03-24

7.  Impact of specialty and level of training on CT measurement of femoral version: an interobserver agreement analysis.

Authors:  Richard S Yoon; John D Koerner; Neeraj M Patel; Michael S Sirkin; Mark C Reilly; Frank A Liporace
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-08-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.