Literature DB >> 21398694

Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence and early outcome. Results from the German transcatheter aortic valve interventions registry.

Mohamed Abdel-Wahab1, Ralf Zahn, Martin Horack, Ulrich Gerckens, Gerhard Schuler, Horst Sievert, Holger Eggebrecht, Jochen Senges, Gert Richardt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Significant aortic regurgitation (AR) is rare following surgical aortic valve replacement and has been associated with worse outcome. Following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), AR is common, but little is known about its determinants and its effect on clinical outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate early outcome and risk factors possibly associated with AR after TAVI.
METHODS: Data were analysed from 690 patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with TAVI enrolled in the prospective multicentre German transcatheter aortic valve interventions registry. The occurrence of AR was evaluated angiographically after device deployment and removal of the catheter and guidewire. Significant AR was defined as AR≥2/4.
RESULTS: The study population's mean age was 81.4±6.3 years and men represented 44%. The mean logistic Euroscore was 20.4±13.1%. Overall, 84% of patients received the Medtronic CoreValve system and 16% received the Edwards Sapien valve. Significant AR occurred in 119 patients (17.2%). Factors independently associated with significant AR were aortic valve area (adjusted OR=0.10), annulus measurement by transoesophageal echocardiography (adjusted OR=1.94), male gender (adjusted OR=1.80), cardiogenic shock (adjusted OR=1.94) and renal failure (adjusted OR=0.53). In-hospital death rates were significantly higher in patients with significant AR than in those with no/mild AR (15.1% vs 6.7%, OR=2.50, 95% CI 1.37 to 4.55), as were rates of low cardiac output (20% vs 4.4%) and respiratory failure (16.5% vs 7.1%). Using multivariate analysis, the presence of post-procedural AR≥2/4 remained a strong independent predictor of in-hospital death (adjusted OR=2.43, 95% CI 1.22 to 4.85).
CONCLUSION: Significant AR after TAVI is common and is associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Long-term follow-up is critical to further define the impact of residual AR on clinical outcome. Until these data become available, every effort should be made to prevent and treat this complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21398694     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2010.217158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  74 in total

Review 1.  Valvular disease in 2011: Breakthrough for intervention?

Authors:  Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Interventional cardiology: Delayed stroke after TAVI--the role of new-onset AF.

Authors:  Jörg Kempfert; Thomas Walther
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Interventional options for severe aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: balloons, snares, valve-in-valve.

Authors:  Holger Eggebrecht; Mirko Doss; Axel Schmermund; Bernd Nowak; Josef Krissel; Thomas Voigtländer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Pre-implantation balloon-aortic valvuloplasty before transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is this still needed?

Authors:  Rafail A Kotronias; Michael Teitelbaum; Rodrigo Bagur
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Almanac 2013: novel non-coronary cardiac interventions.

Authors:  Pascal Meier; Olaf Franzen; Alexandra J Lansky
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 6.  Pathophysiology of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Is It Both Fibrocalcific and Sex Specific?

Authors:  Yoginee Sritharen; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Hartzell V Schaff; Grace Casaclang-Verzosa; Jordan D Miller
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-05

7.  Transapical vs. transfemoral aortic valve implantation: Which approach for which patient, from a surgeon's standpoint.

Authors:  Thomas Walther; Jörg Kempfert
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

8.  Transapical aortic valve implantation with anatomically oriented prostheses.

Authors:  Simon Sündermann; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

9.  Aortic valve calcium scoring is a predictor of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Andrea Colli; Michele Gallo; Eduardo Bernabeu; Augusto D'Onofrio; Vincenzo Tarzia; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

Review 10.  Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Barbara E Stähli; Willibald Maier; Roberto Corti; Thomas F Lüscher; Rolf Jenni; Felix C Tanner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.