MOTIVATION: The concept of pleiotropy was proposed a century ago, though up to now there have been insufficient efforts to design robust statistics and software aimed at visualizing and evaluating pleiotropy at a regional level. The Pleiotropic Region Identification Method (PRIMe) was developed to evaluate potentially pleiotropic loci based upon data from multiple genome-wide association studies (GWAS). METHODS: We first provide a software tool to systematically identify and characterize genomic regions where low association P-values are observed with multiple traits. We use the term Pleiotropy Index to denote the number of traits with low association P-values at a particular genomic region. For GWAS assumed to be uncorrelated, we adopted the binomial distribution to approximate the statistical significance of the Pleiotropy Index. For GWAS conducted on traits with known correlation coefficients, simulations are performed to derive the statistical distribution of the Pleiotropy Index under the null hypothesis of no genotype-phenotype association. For six hematologic and three blood pressure traits where full GWAS results were available from the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium, we estimated the trait correlations and applied the simulation approach to examine genomic regions with statistical evidence of pleiotropy. We then applied the approximation approach to explore GWAS summarized in the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) GWAS Catalog. RESULTS: By simulation, we identified pleiotropic regions including SH2B3 and BRAP (12q24.12) for hematologic and blood pressure traits. By approximation, we confirmed the genome-wide significant pleiotropy of these two regions based on the GWAS Catalog data, together with an exploration on other regions which highlights the FTO, GCKR and ABO regions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The Perl and R scripts are available at http://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/research/gwas_pleiotropictool.html.
MOTIVATION: The concept of pleiotropy was proposed a century ago, though up to now there have been insufficient efforts to design robust statistics and software aimed at visualizing and evaluating pleiotropy at a regional level. The Pleiotropic Region Identification Method (PRIMe) was developed to evaluate potentially pleiotropic loci based upon data from multiple genome-wide association studies (GWAS). METHODS: We first provide a software tool to systematically identify and characterize genomic regions where low association P-values are observed with multiple traits. We use the term Pleiotropy Index to denote the number of traits with low association P-values at a particular genomic region. For GWAS assumed to be uncorrelated, we adopted the binomial distribution to approximate the statistical significance of the Pleiotropy Index. For GWAS conducted on traits with known correlation coefficients, simulations are performed to derive the statistical distribution of the Pleiotropy Index under the null hypothesis of no genotype-phenotype association. For six hematologic and three blood pressure traits where full GWAS results were available from the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium, we estimated the trait correlations and applied the simulation approach to examine genomic regions with statistical evidence of pleiotropy. We then applied the approximation approach to explore GWAS summarized in the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) GWAS Catalog. RESULTS: By simulation, we identified pleiotropic regions including SH2B3 and BRAP (12q24.12) for hematologic and blood pressure traits. By approximation, we confirmed the genome-wide significant pleiotropy of these two regions based on the GWAS Catalog data, together with an exploration on other regions which highlights the FTO, GCKR and ABO regions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The Perl and R scripts are available at http://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/research/gwas_pleiotropictool.html.
Authors: Paul I W de Bakker; Roman Yelensky; Itsik Pe'er; Stacey B Gabriel; Mark J Daly; David Altshuler Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2005-10-23 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2007-07-25 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Chris Church; Lee Moir; Fiona McMurray; Christophe Girard; Gareth T Banks; Lydia Teboul; Sara Wells; Jens C Brüning; Patrick M Nolan; Frances M Ashcroft; Roger D Cox Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-11-14 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Samsiddhi Bhattacharjee; Preetha Rajaraman; Kevin B Jacobs; William A Wheeler; Beatrice S Melin; Patricia Hartge; Meredith Yeager; Charles C Chung; Stephen J Chanock; Nilanjan Chatterjee Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Xiaoling Zhang; Andrew D Johnson; Audrey E Hendricks; Shih-Jen Hwang; Kahraman Tanriverdi; Santhi K Ganesh; Nicholas L Smith; Patricia A Peyser; Jane E Freedman; Christopher J O'Donnell Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Xiaofeng Zhu; Tao Feng; Bamidele O Tayo; Jingjing Liang; J Hunter Young; Nora Franceschini; Jennifer A Smith; Lisa R Yanek; Yan V Sun; Todd L Edwards; Wei Chen; Mike Nalls; Ervin Fox; Michele Sale; Erwin Bottinger; Charles Rotimi; Yongmei Liu; Barbara McKnight; Kiang Liu; Donna K Arnett; Aravinda Chakravati; Richard S Cooper; Susan Redline Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2014-12-11 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Mark W Logue; Matthew Schu; Badri N Vardarajan; John Farrell; Kathryn L Lunetta; Gyungah Jun; Clinton T Baldwin; Margaret M Deangelis; Lindsay A Farrer Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 4.673