Literature DB >> 21398199

Guideline for minimizing radiation exposure during acquisition of coronary artery calcium scans with the use of multidetector computed tomography: a report by the Society for Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention Tomographic Imaging and Prevention Councils in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Szilard Voros1, Juan J Rivera, Daniel S Berman, Ron Blankstein, Matthew J Budoff, Ricardo C Cury, Milind Y Desai, Damini Dey, Sandra S Halliburton, Harvey S Hecht, Khurram Nasir, Raul D Santos, Michael D Shapiro, Allen J Taylor, Uma S Valeti, Phillip M Young, Gaby Weissman.   

Abstract

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning is an important tool for risk stratification in intermediate-risk, asymptomatic subjects without previous coronary disease. However, the clinical benefit of improved risk prediction needs to be balanced against the risk of the use of ionizing radiation. Although there is increasing emphasis on the need to obtain CAC scans at low-radiation exposure to the patient, very few practical documents exist to aid laboratories and health care professionals on how to obtain such low-radiation scans. The Tomographic Imaging Council of the Society for Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, in collaboration with the Prevention Council and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, created a task force and writing group to generate a practical document to address parameters that can be influenced by careful attention to image acquisition. Patient selection for CAC scanning should be based on national guidelines. It is recommended that laboratories performing CAC examinations monitor radiation exposure (dose-length-product [DLP]) and effective radiation dose (E) in all patients. DLP should be <200 mGy × cm; E should average 1.0-1.5 mSv and should be <3.0 mSv. On most scanner platforms, CAC imaging should be performed in an axial mode with prospective electrocardiographic triggering, using tube voltage of 120 kVp. Tube current should be carefully selected on the basis of patient size, potentially using chest lateral width measured on the topogram. Scan length should be limited for the coverage of the heart only. When patients and imaging parameters are selected appropriately, CAC scanning can be performed with low levels of radiation exposure.
Copyright © 2011 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21398199     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  28 in total

Review 1.  The incremental value of coronary artery calcium scores to myocardial single photon emission computer tomography in risk assessment.

Authors:  Marcus Hacker; Christoph Becker
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The associated factors for radiation dose variation in cardiac CT angiography.

Authors:  Ali B Alhailiy; Ernest U Ekpo; Peter L Kench; Elaine A Ryan; Patrick C Brennan; Mark McEntee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT.

Authors:  Sandra S Halliburton; Suhny Abbara; Marcus Y Chen; Ralph Gentry; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Gilbert L Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

Review 4.  CVD screening in low-risk, asymptomatic adults: clinical trials needed.

Authors:  Tamar S Polonsky; Philip Greenland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Coronary calcium scans and radiation exposure in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Bradley Messenger; Dong Li; Khurram Nasir; J Jeffrey Carr; Ron Blankstein; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT.

Authors:  Andrew D Choi; Eric S Leifer; Jeannie Yu; Sujata M Shanbhag; Kathie Bronson; Andrew E Arai; Marcus Y Chen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2016-07-27

Review 7.  Use of cardiac CT and calcium scoring for detecting coronary plaque: implications on prognosis and patient management.

Authors:  S Divakaran; M K Cheezum; E A Hulten; M S Bittencourt; M G Silverman; K Nasir; R Blankstein
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Computed tomography-derived cardiovascular risk markers, incident cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality in nondiabetics: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Joseph Yeboah; J Jeffery Carr; James G Terry; Jingzhong Ding; Irfan Zeb; Songtao Liu; Khurram Nasir; Wendy Post; Roger S Blumenthal; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 7.804

9.  Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals.

Authors:  Joseph Yeboah; Robyn L McClelland; Tamar S Polonsky; Gregory L Burke; Christopher T Sibley; Daniel O'Leary; Jeffery J Carr; David C Goff; Philip Greenland; David M Herrington
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Risk stratification of non-contrast CT beyond the coronary calcium scan.

Authors:  Paul Madaj; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2012-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.