Literature DB >> 21397453

Long-term comparison of mobile-bearing vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Steven T Woolson1, Noah J Epstein, James I Huddleston.   

Abstract

Few published reports have been published regarding a comparison of the long-term outcomes between mobile- (MB) and fixed-bearing component designs for knee arthroplasty. The minimum 10-year clinical and radiologic follow-up of an unselected consecutive series of 89 patients (107 knees) who were randomized to have one of these different designs for primary arthroplasty was done. Twenty-six patients (30 knees) who had a fixed-bearing design and 24 patients (33 knees) who had an MB prosthesis were available for follow-up. Two MB knees were revised for aseptic loosening of a tibial component in one and femoral component fracture in the other. In patients who did not have revision surgery, there were no differences between the groups with respect to mean Knee Society scores, knee flexion, or pain scores. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21397453     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

Review 1.  No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B L Fransen; D C van Duijvenbode; M J M Hoozemans; B J Burger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  An Analysis of Risk Factors for Short-Term Complication Rates and Increased Length of Stay Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bryan D Haughom; William W Schairer; Michael D Hellman; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Brett R Levine
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-01-27

3.  Preoperative flexion does not influence postoperative flexion after rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert D Russell; Michael H Huo; Leslie de Jong; Richard E Jones
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  No difference in clinical outcome between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKA: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Lin Li; Qiang Wu; Guang-Zhi Ning; Shi-Qing Feng; Qiu-Li Wu; Yan Li; Yan Hao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Cuozzo; Marco Pilone; Karen Elsner; Jörg Eschweiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.114

6.  Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing designs in high flexion total knee arthroplasty: using a navigation system.

Authors:  Tae Wan Kim; Shi Hwan Park; Jeung Tak Suh
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2012-02-28

7.  Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ashraf T Hantouly; Abdulaziz F Ahmed; Osama Alzobi; Ammar Toubasi; Motasem Salameh; Aissam Elmhiregh; Shamsi Hameed; Ghalib O Ahmed; Abtin Alvand; Mohammed Al Ateeq Al Dosari
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-05-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.