Literature DB >> 21392753

Risk factors for ERCP-related complications in patients with pancreas divisum: a retrospective study.

Dana C Moffatt1, Gregory A Coté, Haritha Avula, James L Watkins, Lee McHenry, Stuart Sherman, Glen A Lehman, Evan L Fogel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on complication rates of ERCP in patients with pancreas divisum (PD), and it is unclear whether traditional risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) apply.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the rates of ERCP complications in patients with PD and assess patient and procedure-related risk factors for PEP.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 2753 ERCPs performed in 1476 patients with PD from 1997 to 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of PEP, hemorrhage, perforation, cholecystitis, and hospitalization directly attributable to ERCP.
RESULTS: Early complications occurred after 7.8% of procedures, with PEP, hemorrhage, perforation, cholecystitis, and cardiorespiratory complications in 6.8%, 0.7%, 0.2%, 0.1%, and 0.1% of procedures, respectively. PEP was uncommon in patients who did not undergo attempted dorsal duct cannulation, occurring in 1.2% of procedures. With dorsal duct cannulation and cannulation with minor papilla sphincterotomy (MiS), the rates of PEP increased significantly to 8.2% and 10.6%, respectively (P<.01 for each comparison). Significant predictors of PEP after multivariate logistic regression included age younger than 40 (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% CI, 1.27-2.59), female sex (OR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.25-3.01), previous PEP (OR 2.02; 95% CI, 1.32-3.1), attempted dorsal duct cannulation (OR 7.45; 95% CI, 3.25-17.07), and MiS (OR 1.62; 95% CI, 1.05-2.48). Presence of severe chronic pancreatitis was a protective factor (OR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.98). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with PD, the rate of PEP is low (1.2%) if dorsal duct cannulation is not attempted. However, patients with PD undergoing dorsal duct cannulation with or without MiS are at high risk of PEP (8.2% without and 10.6% with). Traditional PEP risk factors apply to patients with PD.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21392753     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  12 in total

Review 1.  Identification and management of pancreas divisum.

Authors:  Aditya Gutta; Evan Fogel; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.869

2.  SpyCatcher: Use of a Novel Cholangioscopic Snare for Capture and Retrieval of a Proximally Migrated Biliary Stent.

Authors:  Monique T Barakat; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound, multidetector computed tomography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreas divisum: a tertiary center experience.

Authors:  Vladimir M Kushnir; Sachin B Wani; Kathryn Fowler; Christine Menias; Rakesh Varma; Vamsi Narra; Christine Hovis; Faris M Murad; Daniel K Mullady; Sreenivasa S Jonnalagadda; Dayna S Early; Steven A Edmundowicz; Riad R Azar
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 4.  Placement of prophylactic pancreatic stents to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qing-Qing Shi; Xiao-Yi Ning; Ling-Ling Zhan; Guo-Du Tang; Xiao-Ping Lv
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Endoscopic approach through the minor papilla for the management of pancreatic diseases.

Authors:  Nao Fujimori; Hisato Igarashi; Akira Asou; Ken Kawabe; Lingaku Lee; Takamasa Oono; Taichi Nakamura; Yusuke Niina; Masayuki Hijioka; Masahiko Uchida; Kazuhiro Kotoh; Kazuhiko Nakamura; Tetsuhide Ito; Ryoichi Takayanagi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-03-16

6.  Pancreatic pseudocyst, pancreatitis, and incomplete pancreas divisum in a child treated with endotherapy: a case report.

Authors:  Jingxin Yan; Zheheng Zhang; Zhixin Wang; Wenhao Yu; Xiaolei Xu; Yaxuan Wang; Haining Fan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 7.  The Accuracies of Diagnosing Pancreas Divisum by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Endoscopic Ultrasound: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhe Shen; Stefan Munker; Boyan Zhou; Lin Li; Chaohui Yu; Youming Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Practice Patterns and Use of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Management of Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Jonathan B Reichstein; Vaishali Patel; Parit Mekaroonkamol; Sunil Dacha; Steven A Keilin; Qiang Cai; Field F Willingham
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2019-07-05

9.  Clinical trial design for testing the stem cell model for the prevention and treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Rishindra M Reddy; Madhuri Kakarala; Max S Wicha
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Pancreatic Duct Variations and the Risk of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Ademola S Ojo
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.