Qing-Qing Shi1, Xiao-Yi Ning1, Ling-Ling Zhan1, Guo-Du Tang1, Xiao-Ping Lv1. 1. Qing-Qing Shi, Guo-Du Tang, Xiao-Ping Lv, Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Abstract
AIM: To assess the effectiveness of pancreatic stents for preventing pancreatitis in high-risk patients after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Science Citation Index, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched to identify relevant trials published in English. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to screen for suitable studies. Two reviewers independently judged the study eligibility while screening the citations. The methodological quality of the included trials was assessed using the Jadad scoring system. All results were expressed as OR and 95%CI. Data were analyzed using Stata12.0 software. RESULTS: Ten eligible randomized controlled trials were selected, including 1176 patients. A fixed-effects model in meta-analysis supported that pancreatic duct stents significantly decreased the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in high-risk patients (OR = 0.25; 95%CI: 0.17-0.38; P < 0.001). Pancreatic stents also alleviated the severity of PEP (mild pancreatitis after ERCP: OR = 0.33; 95%CI: 0.21-0.54; P < 0.001; moderate pancreatitis after ERCP: OR = 0.30; 95%CI: 0.13-0.67; P = 0.004). The result of severe pancreatitis after ERCP was handled more rigorously (OR = 0.24; 95%CI: 0.05-1.16; P = 0.077). Serum amylase levels were not different between patients with pancreatic stents and control patients (OR = 1.08; 95%CI: 0.82-1.41; P = 0.586). CONCLUSION: Placement of prophylactic pancreatic stents may lower the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients and alleviate the severity of this condition.
AIM: To assess the effectiveness of pancreatic stents for preventing pancreatitis in high-risk patients after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Science Citation Index, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched to identify relevant trials published in English. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to screen for suitable studies. Two reviewers independently judged the study eligibility while screening the citations. The methodological quality of the included trials was assessed using the Jadad scoring system. All results were expressed as OR and 95%CI. Data were analyzed using Stata12.0 software. RESULTS: Ten eligible randomized controlled trials were selected, including 1176 patients. A fixed-effects model in meta-analysis supported that pancreatic duct stents significantly decreased the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in high-risk patients (OR = 0.25; 95%CI: 0.17-0.38; P < 0.001). Pancreatic stents also alleviated the severity of PEP (mild pancreatitis after ERCP: OR = 0.33; 95%CI: 0.21-0.54; P < 0.001; moderate pancreatitis after ERCP: OR = 0.30; 95%CI: 0.13-0.67; P = 0.004). The result of severe pancreatitis after ERCP was handled more rigorously (OR = 0.24; 95%CI: 0.05-1.16; P = 0.077). Serum amylase levels were not different between patients with pancreatic stents and control patients (OR = 1.08; 95%CI: 0.82-1.41; P = 0.586). CONCLUSION: Placement of prophylactic pancreatic stents may lower the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients and alleviate the severity of this condition.
Authors: P B Cotton; G Lehman; J Vennes; J E Geenen; R C Russell; W C Meyers; C Liguory; N Nickl Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 1991 May-Jun Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: M L Freeman; D B Nelson; S Sherman; G B Haber; M E Herman; P J Dorsher; J P Moore; M B Fennerty; M E Ryan; M J Shaw; J D Lande; A M Pheley Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-09-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M L Freeman; J A DiSario; D B Nelson; M B Fennerty; J G Lee; D J Bjorkman; C S Overby; J Aas; M E Ryan; G S Bochna; M J Shaw; H W Snady; R V Erickson; J P Moore; J P Roel Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Abdullah Rashdan; Evan L Fogel; Lee McHenry; Stuart Sherman; M'Hamed Temkit; Glen A Lehman Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Greger Olsson; Jeanne Lübbe; Urban Arnelo; Eduard Jonas; Björn Törnqvist; Lars Lundell; Lars Enochsson Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Hwa Seong Nam; Myung Hwan Noh; Ji Eun Han; Jae Hoon Kim; Ki Jong Oh; Hyuk Lee; Jeong Hyun Jo Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 1.927
Authors: Florian Alexander Michael; Ludmilla Gerber; Nina Weiler; Peter Marton Hunyady; Nada Abedin; Anna-Lena Laguna de la Vera; Philipp Stoffers; Natalie Filmann; Stefan Zeuzem; Jörg Bojunga; Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Georg Dultz Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 4.623